X. Min, P. Demers, D. Muller, J. Snell, P. Levine, E. Ostrow
{"title":"与双极和单极心房心内电图评估的P波持续时间的比较:适用于QuickOpt™","authors":"X. Min, P. Demers, D. Muller, J. Snell, P. Levine, E. Ostrow","doi":"10.1109/CIC.2007.4745600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies have shown that inter-atrial conduction time (IACT) can be used to estimate optimal PV delays. QuickOpt utilizes the atrial EGM (AEGM) and measures P-wave duration (PW) to estimate the IACT. This study compares PW between bipolar (Bi) and unipolar (Uni) AEGMs in patients with either a pacemaker (PP) or a CRT-D pulse generator. Bipolar (Bi) and Unipolar (Uni) AEGMs were obtained from 42 PP and 18 CRT-D pts. In the PP, PWs associated with Bi and Uni AEGMs were close (114plusmn19 ms vs. 110plusmn20 ms). Intra-patient difference was 3.9plusmn8.7 ms, and the 95% confidence interval for the difference was (1.2, 6.6). With CRT-D, PWs were 79plusmn18.4 ms and 81plusmn14 ms for Bi and Uni sensing and the intra-patient difference was -1.2plusmn14.9 ms. In 18 PP, the difference between ECG and either bipolar or unipolar PW was 4.8plusmn17.8 ms and 0.9 ms plusmn 15.5 ms respectively. PWs were similar between unipolar AEGMs, bipolar AEGMs, and surface ECG.","PeriodicalId":406683,"journal":{"name":"2007 Computers in Cardiology","volume":"275 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of P wave durations as assessed with the bipolar and unipolar atrial intracardiac electrograms: Applicability to QuickOpt™\",\"authors\":\"X. Min, P. Demers, D. Muller, J. Snell, P. Levine, E. Ostrow\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CIC.2007.4745600\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Studies have shown that inter-atrial conduction time (IACT) can be used to estimate optimal PV delays. QuickOpt utilizes the atrial EGM (AEGM) and measures P-wave duration (PW) to estimate the IACT. This study compares PW between bipolar (Bi) and unipolar (Uni) AEGMs in patients with either a pacemaker (PP) or a CRT-D pulse generator. Bipolar (Bi) and Unipolar (Uni) AEGMs were obtained from 42 PP and 18 CRT-D pts. In the PP, PWs associated with Bi and Uni AEGMs were close (114plusmn19 ms vs. 110plusmn20 ms). Intra-patient difference was 3.9plusmn8.7 ms, and the 95% confidence interval for the difference was (1.2, 6.6). With CRT-D, PWs were 79plusmn18.4 ms and 81plusmn14 ms for Bi and Uni sensing and the intra-patient difference was -1.2plusmn14.9 ms. In 18 PP, the difference between ECG and either bipolar or unipolar PW was 4.8plusmn17.8 ms and 0.9 ms plusmn 15.5 ms respectively. PWs were similar between unipolar AEGMs, bipolar AEGMs, and surface ECG.\",\"PeriodicalId\":406683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2007 Computers in Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"275 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2007 Computers in Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIC.2007.4745600\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 Computers in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIC.2007.4745600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究表明,房间传导时间(IACT)可用于估计最佳PV延迟。QuickOpt利用心房EGM (AEGM)和测量p波持续时间(PW)来估计IACT。本研究比较了使用起搏器(PP)或CRT-D脉冲发生器的患者双极(Bi)和单极(Uni) egms的PW。从42名PP和18名CRT-D患者中获得双极(Bi)和单极(Uni) egms。在PP中,与Bi和Uni AEGMs相关的PWs接近(114plusmn19 ms vs. 110plusmn20 ms)。患者内差异为3.9±8.7 ms,差异的95%置信区间为(1.2,6.6)。ct - d检测Bi和Uni的PWs分别为79plusmn18.4 ms和81plusmn14 ms,患者内差异为-1.2plusmn14.9 ms。在18pp时,心电图与双极或单极PW的差异分别为4.8 ms + 17.8 ms和0.9 ms + 15.5 ms。单极心电图、双极心电图和体表心电图的PWs相似。
Comparison of P wave durations as assessed with the bipolar and unipolar atrial intracardiac electrograms: Applicability to QuickOpt™
Studies have shown that inter-atrial conduction time (IACT) can be used to estimate optimal PV delays. QuickOpt utilizes the atrial EGM (AEGM) and measures P-wave duration (PW) to estimate the IACT. This study compares PW between bipolar (Bi) and unipolar (Uni) AEGMs in patients with either a pacemaker (PP) or a CRT-D pulse generator. Bipolar (Bi) and Unipolar (Uni) AEGMs were obtained from 42 PP and 18 CRT-D pts. In the PP, PWs associated with Bi and Uni AEGMs were close (114plusmn19 ms vs. 110plusmn20 ms). Intra-patient difference was 3.9plusmn8.7 ms, and the 95% confidence interval for the difference was (1.2, 6.6). With CRT-D, PWs were 79plusmn18.4 ms and 81plusmn14 ms for Bi and Uni sensing and the intra-patient difference was -1.2plusmn14.9 ms. In 18 PP, the difference between ECG and either bipolar or unipolar PW was 4.8plusmn17.8 ms and 0.9 ms plusmn 15.5 ms respectively. PWs were similar between unipolar AEGMs, bipolar AEGMs, and surface ECG.