{"title":"论电子邮件的步骤:从正常系统到对应决策问题","authors":"Vesa Halava, T. Harju","doi":"10.14232/actacyb.284625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1946, Emil Leon Post (Bulletin of Amer. Math. Soc. 52 (1946), 264-268) introduced his famouscorrespondence decision problem, nowadays known as the Post Correspondence Problem (PCP).Post proved the undecidability of the PCP by areduction from his normal systems. In the presentarticle we follow the steps of Post, and give another, somewhat simpler and more straightforwardproof of the undecidability of the problem by using the same source of reductions as Post did.We investigate these, very different, techniques, and point out out some peculiarities in theapproach used by Post.","PeriodicalId":187125,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cybern.","volume":"207 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Steps of Emil Post: from Normal Systems to the Correspondence Decision Problem\",\"authors\":\"Vesa Halava, T. Harju\",\"doi\":\"10.14232/actacyb.284625\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1946, Emil Leon Post (Bulletin of Amer. Math. Soc. 52 (1946), 264-268) introduced his famouscorrespondence decision problem, nowadays known as the Post Correspondence Problem (PCP).Post proved the undecidability of the PCP by areduction from his normal systems. In the presentarticle we follow the steps of Post, and give another, somewhat simpler and more straightforwardproof of the undecidability of the problem by using the same source of reductions as Post did.We investigate these, very different, techniques, and point out out some peculiarities in theapproach used by Post.\",\"PeriodicalId\":187125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Cybern.\",\"volume\":\"207 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Cybern.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14232/actacyb.284625\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Cybern.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14232/actacyb.284625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
On the Steps of Emil Post: from Normal Systems to the Correspondence Decision Problem
In 1946, Emil Leon Post (Bulletin of Amer. Math. Soc. 52 (1946), 264-268) introduced his famouscorrespondence decision problem, nowadays known as the Post Correspondence Problem (PCP).Post proved the undecidability of the PCP by areduction from his normal systems. In the presentarticle we follow the steps of Post, and give another, somewhat simpler and more straightforwardproof of the undecidability of the problem by using the same source of reductions as Post did.We investigate these, very different, techniques, and point out out some peculiarities in theapproach used by Post.