Priyanka Wadhawan, M. Kumar, A. Mayya, P. P. Marathe
{"title":"当前基于签名的中继健康监测方案的比较与失效模式分析","authors":"Priyanka Wadhawan, M. Kumar, A. Mayya, P. P. Marathe","doi":"10.1109/ICRITO.2017.8342417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electromagnetic relays are widely used to communicate safety signals in critical applications, where the failure of the relay leads to risk. Traditionally, there are various techniques for relay health monitoring, that is, finite impulse test (FIT), read back and spare contact reading. These techniques are either intrusive (e.g. FIT and spare contact reading) or does not test the relay completely (e.g. read back). Recently it has been shown that current signature of energizing/de-energizing relay can be used to estimate health of relay contacts. The relays used in safety applications are normally kept energized to ensure fail-safeness. So, of all prominent failure modes of electromagnetic relay, welded contact (i.e. no changeover on relay de-energization) is the most critical one. The current signature of de-energizing relay is employed to detect welded contacts. The paper compares three diverse relay health monitoring schemes and one scheme is analysed for effect of component failure using FMEA (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis).","PeriodicalId":357118,"journal":{"name":"2017 6th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison and failure mode analysis of current signature based relay health monitoring schemes\",\"authors\":\"Priyanka Wadhawan, M. Kumar, A. Mayya, P. P. Marathe\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICRITO.2017.8342417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Electromagnetic relays are widely used to communicate safety signals in critical applications, where the failure of the relay leads to risk. Traditionally, there are various techniques for relay health monitoring, that is, finite impulse test (FIT), read back and spare contact reading. These techniques are either intrusive (e.g. FIT and spare contact reading) or does not test the relay completely (e.g. read back). Recently it has been shown that current signature of energizing/de-energizing relay can be used to estimate health of relay contacts. The relays used in safety applications are normally kept energized to ensure fail-safeness. So, of all prominent failure modes of electromagnetic relay, welded contact (i.e. no changeover on relay de-energization) is the most critical one. The current signature of de-energizing relay is employed to detect welded contacts. The paper compares three diverse relay health monitoring schemes and one scheme is analysed for effect of component failure using FMEA (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis).\",\"PeriodicalId\":357118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 6th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO)\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 6th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRITO.2017.8342417\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 6th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRITO.2017.8342417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
电磁继电器在关键应用中广泛用于传递安全信号,在这些应用中,继电器的故障会导致危险。传统的继电器健康监测技术有有限脉冲测试(FIT)、回读和备用触点读取。这些技术要么是侵入式的(例如FIT和备用触点读取),要么不完全测试继电器(例如回读)。近年来已有研究表明,可以利用励磁/励磁继电器的电流特征来估计继电器触点的健康状况。安全应用中使用的继电器通常保持通电,以确保故障安全。因此,在电磁继电器所有突出的失效模式中,焊接触点(即继电器断电时不换电)是最关键的失效模式。利用断电继电器的电流特征对焊接触点进行检测。本文对三种不同的继电器健康监测方案进行了比较,并利用失效模式与影响分析(failure Mode and Effects Analysis, FMEA)分析了其中一种方案对元件故障的影响。
Comparison and failure mode analysis of current signature based relay health monitoring schemes
Electromagnetic relays are widely used to communicate safety signals in critical applications, where the failure of the relay leads to risk. Traditionally, there are various techniques for relay health monitoring, that is, finite impulse test (FIT), read back and spare contact reading. These techniques are either intrusive (e.g. FIT and spare contact reading) or does not test the relay completely (e.g. read back). Recently it has been shown that current signature of energizing/de-energizing relay can be used to estimate health of relay contacts. The relays used in safety applications are normally kept energized to ensure fail-safeness. So, of all prominent failure modes of electromagnetic relay, welded contact (i.e. no changeover on relay de-energization) is the most critical one. The current signature of de-energizing relay is employed to detect welded contacts. The paper compares three diverse relay health monitoring schemes and one scheme is analysed for effect of component failure using FMEA (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis).