欧洲联盟和俄罗斯联邦在保护被迫移徙者权利方面的立法比较分析

V. Volokh, E. Kazban, N. Omelchenko, V. Suvorova, O. Yakhshiyan
{"title":"欧洲联盟和俄罗斯联邦在保护被迫移徙者权利方面的立法比较分析","authors":"V. Volokh, E. Kazban, N. Omelchenko, V. Suvorova, O. Yakhshiyan","doi":"10.2991/mplg-ia-19.2019.76","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study is to comprehensively comparatively analyze the laws of the European Union and the legislation of the Russian Federation in the context of forced migration and to identify the existing ones in it gaps. The work used scientific methods of analysis and synthesis, analogies, systemic, formal-logical and dialectical. As a method of knowledge, the formal legal and comparative-legal method of cognition was used as a private-scientific method. European Union law has shown that the EU is on the lookout for more effective legal tools to deal with the reception of third-country nationals and state asylum sequesters seeking asylum on their territory. The study of the situation in Russia shows that Russian Federation a holistic system of asylum for foreign nationals and stateless persons based on universally accepted norms of international law and, above all, the provisions of the 1951 Convention on the Status of Refugees has been established and the Protocol to it in 1967includingsystem for granting the status of internally displaced persons. The analysis suggests that The European asylum system has faced both technical difficulties in identifying asylum seekers anticonceptual this regard, the reform of the Dublin system to create a fair and sustainable distribution among EU member states of asylum seekers, perhaps will be an effective mechanism to reduce the pressure on countries who have received the most .At the same time, the legislation Russian Federation Also badly needed to systematize and modernize, taking into account the priority areas of development of favorable conditions for economic, social and legal guarantees to protect the rights and legitimate interests of foreign nationals and stateless asylum seekers or asylum seekers in the Russian Federation. Keywords–forced migration, asylum seekers, refugees, internally displaced persons, EU forced migration legislation, Russian migration legislation, forced migration","PeriodicalId":129193,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Man-Power-Law-Governance: Interdisciplinary Approaches (MPLG-IA 2019)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of the legislation of the European Union and the Russian federation in the field of protection of the rights of forced migrants\",\"authors\":\"V. Volokh, E. Kazban, N. Omelchenko, V. Suvorova, O. Yakhshiyan\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/mplg-ia-19.2019.76\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of the study is to comprehensively comparatively analyze the laws of the European Union and the legislation of the Russian Federation in the context of forced migration and to identify the existing ones in it gaps. The work used scientific methods of analysis and synthesis, analogies, systemic, formal-logical and dialectical. As a method of knowledge, the formal legal and comparative-legal method of cognition was used as a private-scientific method. European Union law has shown that the EU is on the lookout for more effective legal tools to deal with the reception of third-country nationals and state asylum sequesters seeking asylum on their territory. The study of the situation in Russia shows that Russian Federation a holistic system of asylum for foreign nationals and stateless persons based on universally accepted norms of international law and, above all, the provisions of the 1951 Convention on the Status of Refugees has been established and the Protocol to it in 1967includingsystem for granting the status of internally displaced persons. The analysis suggests that The European asylum system has faced both technical difficulties in identifying asylum seekers anticonceptual this regard, the reform of the Dublin system to create a fair and sustainable distribution among EU member states of asylum seekers, perhaps will be an effective mechanism to reduce the pressure on countries who have received the most .At the same time, the legislation Russian Federation Also badly needed to systematize and modernize, taking into account the priority areas of development of favorable conditions for economic, social and legal guarantees to protect the rights and legitimate interests of foreign nationals and stateless asylum seekers or asylum seekers in the Russian Federation. Keywords–forced migration, asylum seekers, refugees, internally displaced persons, EU forced migration legislation, Russian migration legislation, forced migration\",\"PeriodicalId\":129193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Man-Power-Law-Governance: Interdisciplinary Approaches (MPLG-IA 2019)\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Man-Power-Law-Governance: Interdisciplinary Approaches (MPLG-IA 2019)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/mplg-ia-19.2019.76\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Man-Power-Law-Governance: Interdisciplinary Approaches (MPLG-IA 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/mplg-ia-19.2019.76","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是全面比较分析欧盟法律和俄罗斯联邦立法在强迫移民方面的情况,并找出现有法律在其中的差距。作品运用了分析综合、类比、系统、形式逻辑和辩证的科学方法。作为一种认识方法,形式法学和比较法学的认识方法被用作一种私人科学方法。欧盟法律表明,欧盟正在寻找更有效的法律工具来处理接收第三国国民和在其领土上寻求庇护的国家庇护隔离者的问题。对俄罗斯局势的研究表明,俄罗斯联邦在普遍接受的国际法准则的基础上,首先是1951年《难民地位公约》及其1967年《议定书》的规定,建立了对外国国民和无国籍人的整体庇护制度,其中包括给予国内流离失所者地位的制度。分析认为,欧洲庇护制度在识别寻求庇护者方面既面临着技术上的困难,也面临着概念性的这一方面,改革都柏林制度,在欧盟成员国之间创造一个公平和可持续的分配寻求庇护者的机制,或许将是减轻接收最多国家压力的有效机制。同时,俄罗斯联邦的立法也急需系统化和现代化。考虑到为经济、社会和法律保障创造有利条件的优先领域,以保护俄罗斯联邦境内的外国国民和无国籍寻求庇护者或寻求庇护者的权利和合法利益。关键词:强迫移民,寻求庇护者,难民,国内流离失所者,欧盟强迫移民立法,俄罗斯移民立法,强迫移民
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative analysis of the legislation of the European Union and the Russian federation in the field of protection of the rights of forced migrants
The aim of the study is to comprehensively comparatively analyze the laws of the European Union and the legislation of the Russian Federation in the context of forced migration and to identify the existing ones in it gaps. The work used scientific methods of analysis and synthesis, analogies, systemic, formal-logical and dialectical. As a method of knowledge, the formal legal and comparative-legal method of cognition was used as a private-scientific method. European Union law has shown that the EU is on the lookout for more effective legal tools to deal with the reception of third-country nationals and state asylum sequesters seeking asylum on their territory. The study of the situation in Russia shows that Russian Federation a holistic system of asylum for foreign nationals and stateless persons based on universally accepted norms of international law and, above all, the provisions of the 1951 Convention on the Status of Refugees has been established and the Protocol to it in 1967includingsystem for granting the status of internally displaced persons. The analysis suggests that The European asylum system has faced both technical difficulties in identifying asylum seekers anticonceptual this regard, the reform of the Dublin system to create a fair and sustainable distribution among EU member states of asylum seekers, perhaps will be an effective mechanism to reduce the pressure on countries who have received the most .At the same time, the legislation Russian Federation Also badly needed to systematize and modernize, taking into account the priority areas of development of favorable conditions for economic, social and legal guarantees to protect the rights and legitimate interests of foreign nationals and stateless asylum seekers or asylum seekers in the Russian Federation. Keywords–forced migration, asylum seekers, refugees, internally displaced persons, EU forced migration legislation, Russian migration legislation, forced migration
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ethnocultural self-determination of students in the educational environment of the University Innovations as factor of sustainable development of economic systems The role of the Moscow exchange society in the development of commercial education Private law in the Russian law system: conceptual understanding and development prospects Use of public-private partnership tools for regional development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1