V. Volokh, E. Kazban, N. Omelchenko, V. Suvorova, O. Yakhshiyan
{"title":"欧洲联盟和俄罗斯联邦在保护被迫移徙者权利方面的立法比较分析","authors":"V. Volokh, E. Kazban, N. Omelchenko, V. Suvorova, O. Yakhshiyan","doi":"10.2991/mplg-ia-19.2019.76","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study is to comprehensively comparatively analyze the laws of the European Union and the legislation of the Russian Federation in the context of forced migration and to identify the existing ones in it gaps. The work used scientific methods of analysis and synthesis, analogies, systemic, formal-logical and dialectical. As a method of knowledge, the formal legal and comparative-legal method of cognition was used as a private-scientific method. European Union law has shown that the EU is on the lookout for more effective legal tools to deal with the reception of third-country nationals and state asylum sequesters seeking asylum on their territory. The study of the situation in Russia shows that Russian Federation a holistic system of asylum for foreign nationals and stateless persons based on universally accepted norms of international law and, above all, the provisions of the 1951 Convention on the Status of Refugees has been established and the Protocol to it in 1967includingsystem for granting the status of internally displaced persons. The analysis suggests that The European asylum system has faced both technical difficulties in identifying asylum seekers anticonceptual this regard, the reform of the Dublin system to create a fair and sustainable distribution among EU member states of asylum seekers, perhaps will be an effective mechanism to reduce the pressure on countries who have received the most .At the same time, the legislation Russian Federation Also badly needed to systematize and modernize, taking into account the priority areas of development of favorable conditions for economic, social and legal guarantees to protect the rights and legitimate interests of foreign nationals and stateless asylum seekers or asylum seekers in the Russian Federation. Keywords–forced migration, asylum seekers, refugees, internally displaced persons, EU forced migration legislation, Russian migration legislation, forced migration","PeriodicalId":129193,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Man-Power-Law-Governance: Interdisciplinary Approaches (MPLG-IA 2019)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of the legislation of the European Union and the Russian federation in the field of protection of the rights of forced migrants\",\"authors\":\"V. Volokh, E. Kazban, N. Omelchenko, V. Suvorova, O. Yakhshiyan\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/mplg-ia-19.2019.76\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of the study is to comprehensively comparatively analyze the laws of the European Union and the legislation of the Russian Federation in the context of forced migration and to identify the existing ones in it gaps. The work used scientific methods of analysis and synthesis, analogies, systemic, formal-logical and dialectical. As a method of knowledge, the formal legal and comparative-legal method of cognition was used as a private-scientific method. European Union law has shown that the EU is on the lookout for more effective legal tools to deal with the reception of third-country nationals and state asylum sequesters seeking asylum on their territory. The study of the situation in Russia shows that Russian Federation a holistic system of asylum for foreign nationals and stateless persons based on universally accepted norms of international law and, above all, the provisions of the 1951 Convention on the Status of Refugees has been established and the Protocol to it in 1967includingsystem for granting the status of internally displaced persons. The analysis suggests that The European asylum system has faced both technical difficulties in identifying asylum seekers anticonceptual this regard, the reform of the Dublin system to create a fair and sustainable distribution among EU member states of asylum seekers, perhaps will be an effective mechanism to reduce the pressure on countries who have received the most .At the same time, the legislation Russian Federation Also badly needed to systematize and modernize, taking into account the priority areas of development of favorable conditions for economic, social and legal guarantees to protect the rights and legitimate interests of foreign nationals and stateless asylum seekers or asylum seekers in the Russian Federation. Keywords–forced migration, asylum seekers, refugees, internally displaced persons, EU forced migration legislation, Russian migration legislation, forced migration\",\"PeriodicalId\":129193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Man-Power-Law-Governance: Interdisciplinary Approaches (MPLG-IA 2019)\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Man-Power-Law-Governance: Interdisciplinary Approaches (MPLG-IA 2019)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/mplg-ia-19.2019.76\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Man-Power-Law-Governance: Interdisciplinary Approaches (MPLG-IA 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/mplg-ia-19.2019.76","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative analysis of the legislation of the European Union and the Russian federation in the field of protection of the rights of forced migrants
The aim of the study is to comprehensively comparatively analyze the laws of the European Union and the legislation of the Russian Federation in the context of forced migration and to identify the existing ones in it gaps. The work used scientific methods of analysis and synthesis, analogies, systemic, formal-logical and dialectical. As a method of knowledge, the formal legal and comparative-legal method of cognition was used as a private-scientific method. European Union law has shown that the EU is on the lookout for more effective legal tools to deal with the reception of third-country nationals and state asylum sequesters seeking asylum on their territory. The study of the situation in Russia shows that Russian Federation a holistic system of asylum for foreign nationals and stateless persons based on universally accepted norms of international law and, above all, the provisions of the 1951 Convention on the Status of Refugees has been established and the Protocol to it in 1967includingsystem for granting the status of internally displaced persons. The analysis suggests that The European asylum system has faced both technical difficulties in identifying asylum seekers anticonceptual this regard, the reform of the Dublin system to create a fair and sustainable distribution among EU member states of asylum seekers, perhaps will be an effective mechanism to reduce the pressure on countries who have received the most .At the same time, the legislation Russian Federation Also badly needed to systematize and modernize, taking into account the priority areas of development of favorable conditions for economic, social and legal guarantees to protect the rights and legitimate interests of foreign nationals and stateless asylum seekers or asylum seekers in the Russian Federation. Keywords–forced migration, asylum seekers, refugees, internally displaced persons, EU forced migration legislation, Russian migration legislation, forced migration