{"title":"悄无声息的辞职:为什么这么多女律师放弃了自己的职业?","authors":"Jane R. Bambauer, T. Rahman","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3335481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Author(s): Bambauer, Jane R; Rahman, Tauhidur | Abstract: Thirty percent of female lawyers leave their careers. The same is true for female doctors. Over time, an increasing number of married professionals have recreated traditional gender roles, and society has lost a tremendous amount of training and well-honed talent as a result. Neither workplace discrimination nor family obligations can fully and satisfactorily explain the trend. Both of those theories assume that women take a more dependent and vulnerable position in the household because of constraints, but in one important respect, men are more constrained than women, and they are better off for it: to maintain social status, men have to work. Women do not. This Article advances a theory and corroborating evidence that the cultural acceptance of female underemployment is a privilege in the abstract, but a curse in practice. Even under the best conditions, the early stages of professional careers involve mistakes, mismatches, and disappointments. An opportunity to escape the stress of the public sphere by focusing on the family may have great appeal in the short run even though the long-run consequences are severe. Asymmetric cultural acceptance creates an easy off-ramp for females, to nearly everybody’s detriment.","PeriodicalId":108281,"journal":{"name":"Women & Law eJournal","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Quiet Resignation: Why Do So Many Female Lawyers Abandon Their Careers?\",\"authors\":\"Jane R. Bambauer, T. Rahman\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3335481\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Author(s): Bambauer, Jane R; Rahman, Tauhidur | Abstract: Thirty percent of female lawyers leave their careers. The same is true for female doctors. Over time, an increasing number of married professionals have recreated traditional gender roles, and society has lost a tremendous amount of training and well-honed talent as a result. Neither workplace discrimination nor family obligations can fully and satisfactorily explain the trend. Both of those theories assume that women take a more dependent and vulnerable position in the household because of constraints, but in one important respect, men are more constrained than women, and they are better off for it: to maintain social status, men have to work. Women do not. This Article advances a theory and corroborating evidence that the cultural acceptance of female underemployment is a privilege in the abstract, but a curse in practice. Even under the best conditions, the early stages of professional careers involve mistakes, mismatches, and disappointments. An opportunity to escape the stress of the public sphere by focusing on the family may have great appeal in the short run even though the long-run consequences are severe. Asymmetric cultural acceptance creates an easy off-ramp for females, to nearly everybody’s detriment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":108281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women & Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women & Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3335481\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women & Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3335481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
作者:Bambauer, Jane R;摘要:30%的女律师离职。女医生也是如此。随着时间的推移,越来越多的已婚专业人士重新塑造了传统的性别角色,结果,社会失去了大量的培训和磨练有素的人才。无论是职场歧视还是家庭义务都不能充分和令人满意地解释这一趋势。这两种理论都假设女性在家庭中由于约束而处于更依赖和更脆弱的地位,但在一个重要的方面,男性比女性更受约束,他们也因此更富有:为了保持社会地位,男性必须工作。女性则不然。本文提出了一个理论和实证,即对女性就业不足的文化接受在抽象上是一种特权,但在实践中却是一种诅咒。即使在最好的条件下,职业生涯的早期阶段也会出现错误、不匹配和失望。通过专注于家庭来逃避公共领域压力的机会在短期内可能具有很大的吸引力,尽管长期后果是严重的。不对称的文化接受为女性创造了一个轻松的退路,这几乎损害了所有人的利益。
The Quiet Resignation: Why Do So Many Female Lawyers Abandon Their Careers?
Author(s): Bambauer, Jane R; Rahman, Tauhidur | Abstract: Thirty percent of female lawyers leave their careers. The same is true for female doctors. Over time, an increasing number of married professionals have recreated traditional gender roles, and society has lost a tremendous amount of training and well-honed talent as a result. Neither workplace discrimination nor family obligations can fully and satisfactorily explain the trend. Both of those theories assume that women take a more dependent and vulnerable position in the household because of constraints, but in one important respect, men are more constrained than women, and they are better off for it: to maintain social status, men have to work. Women do not. This Article advances a theory and corroborating evidence that the cultural acceptance of female underemployment is a privilege in the abstract, but a curse in practice. Even under the best conditions, the early stages of professional careers involve mistakes, mismatches, and disappointments. An opportunity to escape the stress of the public sphere by focusing on the family may have great appeal in the short run even though the long-run consequences are severe. Asymmetric cultural acceptance creates an easy off-ramp for females, to nearly everybody’s detriment.