{"title":"收益不确定和损失规避下的三供应商库存管理","authors":"Lijun Ma, Qinghua Zeng, Yangliang Ge","doi":"10.1109/ICSSSM.2013.6602641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we consider a single-product, single-period inventory model where the retailer can order from three different suppliers. Supplier 1 is the cheapest but the most unreliable as the retailer may not get as many as he ordered. Supplier 2 is more expensive than supplier 1 by offering a supply option. supplier 3 is the most expensive but most reliable and will serve as an emergency supplier. Employing a loss-aversion utility function, we study the procurement problem for the retailer. In this model, the loss-averse retailer has to decide the order quantity from supplier 1 and reserve the order quantity from the supplier 2. We find that there exists an optimal solution no matter whether the retailer is loss-averse or not. We show by numerical experiments how the optimal decisions are affected by cost parameters, and find that the optimal order quantity from supplier 1 increases by the degree of loss-aversion while the reserve quantity from supplier 2 changes in a reverse way. Furthermore, the expected utility of the retailer decreases by the degree of loss-aversion.","PeriodicalId":354195,"journal":{"name":"2013 10th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inventory management with three suppliers under yield uncertainty and loss-aversion\",\"authors\":\"Lijun Ma, Qinghua Zeng, Yangliang Ge\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSSSM.2013.6602641\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we consider a single-product, single-period inventory model where the retailer can order from three different suppliers. Supplier 1 is the cheapest but the most unreliable as the retailer may not get as many as he ordered. Supplier 2 is more expensive than supplier 1 by offering a supply option. supplier 3 is the most expensive but most reliable and will serve as an emergency supplier. Employing a loss-aversion utility function, we study the procurement problem for the retailer. In this model, the loss-averse retailer has to decide the order quantity from supplier 1 and reserve the order quantity from the supplier 2. We find that there exists an optimal solution no matter whether the retailer is loss-averse or not. We show by numerical experiments how the optimal decisions are affected by cost parameters, and find that the optimal order quantity from supplier 1 increases by the degree of loss-aversion while the reserve quantity from supplier 2 changes in a reverse way. Furthermore, the expected utility of the retailer decreases by the degree of loss-aversion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":354195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 10th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 10th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSSM.2013.6602641\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 10th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSSM.2013.6602641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Inventory management with three suppliers under yield uncertainty and loss-aversion
In this paper, we consider a single-product, single-period inventory model where the retailer can order from three different suppliers. Supplier 1 is the cheapest but the most unreliable as the retailer may not get as many as he ordered. Supplier 2 is more expensive than supplier 1 by offering a supply option. supplier 3 is the most expensive but most reliable and will serve as an emergency supplier. Employing a loss-aversion utility function, we study the procurement problem for the retailer. In this model, the loss-averse retailer has to decide the order quantity from supplier 1 and reserve the order quantity from the supplier 2. We find that there exists an optimal solution no matter whether the retailer is loss-averse or not. We show by numerical experiments how the optimal decisions are affected by cost parameters, and find that the optimal order quantity from supplier 1 increases by the degree of loss-aversion while the reserve quantity from supplier 2 changes in a reverse way. Furthermore, the expected utility of the retailer decreases by the degree of loss-aversion.