{"title":"银行流动性的决定因素:市场与监管要求相互作用的法国视角","authors":"O. de Bandt, celine lecarpentier, C. Pouvelle","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3707993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper investigates the impact of solvency and liquidity regulation as well as market shocks on banks’ balance sheet structure It contributes in particular to the debate on the use of liquidity buffers by banks, as initiated by Goodhart (2008)s “last taxiǥ argument The volatility of long-term markets observed during the Covid-19 pandemic shows that periods of sharp increase in risk aversion still result in liquidity strains for banks The latter react differently depending on the diversity of their funding sources and their risk profile Indeed, during a crisis, due to interactions between funding and market liquidity, as well as regulatory constraints, one may wonder whether banks may increase or decrease liquidity According to a simple portfolio allocation model banks'liquidity increases when the regulatory constraint is binding, as banks hoard extra liquidity, while they do not if the regulatory constraint is not binding We show that in times of crisis, measured by large deviations of a financial variable capturing international markets’ risk aversion, French banks actually decreased the liquidity coefficient, with our results mostly driven by less liquid banks However, while we do find that the solvency ratio has a weakly significant effect on the liquidity coefficient, we were not able to establish a firm causal relationship between the two variables on the basis of Granger causality tests © 2020 Elsevier B V","PeriodicalId":101534,"journal":{"name":"Banque de France Research Paper Series","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determinants of Banks’ Liquidity: A French Perspective on Interactions between Market and Regulatory Requirements\",\"authors\":\"O. de Bandt, celine lecarpentier, C. Pouvelle\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3707993\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper investigates the impact of solvency and liquidity regulation as well as market shocks on banks’ balance sheet structure It contributes in particular to the debate on the use of liquidity buffers by banks, as initiated by Goodhart (2008)s “last taxiǥ argument The volatility of long-term markets observed during the Covid-19 pandemic shows that periods of sharp increase in risk aversion still result in liquidity strains for banks The latter react differently depending on the diversity of their funding sources and their risk profile Indeed, during a crisis, due to interactions between funding and market liquidity, as well as regulatory constraints, one may wonder whether banks may increase or decrease liquidity According to a simple portfolio allocation model banks'liquidity increases when the regulatory constraint is binding, as banks hoard extra liquidity, while they do not if the regulatory constraint is not binding We show that in times of crisis, measured by large deviations of a financial variable capturing international markets’ risk aversion, French banks actually decreased the liquidity coefficient, with our results mostly driven by less liquid banks However, while we do find that the solvency ratio has a weakly significant effect on the liquidity coefficient, we were not able to establish a firm causal relationship between the two variables on the basis of Granger causality tests © 2020 Elsevier B V\",\"PeriodicalId\":101534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Banque de France Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Banque de France Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3707993\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Banque de France Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3707993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
Determinants of Banks’ Liquidity: A French Perspective on Interactions between Market and Regulatory Requirements
The paper investigates the impact of solvency and liquidity regulation as well as market shocks on banks’ balance sheet structure It contributes in particular to the debate on the use of liquidity buffers by banks, as initiated by Goodhart (2008)s “last taxiǥ argument The volatility of long-term markets observed during the Covid-19 pandemic shows that periods of sharp increase in risk aversion still result in liquidity strains for banks The latter react differently depending on the diversity of their funding sources and their risk profile Indeed, during a crisis, due to interactions between funding and market liquidity, as well as regulatory constraints, one may wonder whether banks may increase or decrease liquidity According to a simple portfolio allocation model banks'liquidity increases when the regulatory constraint is binding, as banks hoard extra liquidity, while they do not if the regulatory constraint is not binding We show that in times of crisis, measured by large deviations of a financial variable capturing international markets’ risk aversion, French banks actually decreased the liquidity coefficient, with our results mostly driven by less liquid banks However, while we do find that the solvency ratio has a weakly significant effect on the liquidity coefficient, we were not able to establish a firm causal relationship between the two variables on the basis of Granger causality tests © 2020 Elsevier B V