银行流动性的决定因素:市场与监管要求相互作用的法国视角

O. de Bandt, celine lecarpentier, C. Pouvelle
{"title":"银行流动性的决定因素:市场与监管要求相互作用的法国视角","authors":"O. de Bandt, celine lecarpentier, C. Pouvelle","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3707993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper investigates the impact of solvency and liquidity regulation as well as market shocks on banks’ balance sheet structure It contributes in particular to the debate on the use of liquidity buffers by banks, as initiated by Goodhart (2008)s “last taxiǥ argument The volatility of long-term markets observed during the Covid-19 pandemic shows that periods of sharp increase in risk aversion still result in liquidity strains for banks The latter react differently depending on the diversity of their funding sources and their risk profile Indeed, during a crisis, due to interactions between funding and market liquidity, as well as regulatory constraints, one may wonder whether banks may increase or decrease liquidity According to a simple portfolio allocation model banks'liquidity increases when the regulatory constraint is binding, as banks hoard extra liquidity, while they do not if the regulatory constraint is not binding We show that in times of crisis, measured by large deviations of a financial variable capturing international markets’ risk aversion, French banks actually decreased the liquidity coefficient, with our results mostly driven by less liquid banks However, while we do find that the solvency ratio has a weakly significant effect on the liquidity coefficient, we were not able to establish a firm causal relationship between the two variables on the basis of Granger causality tests © 2020 Elsevier B V","PeriodicalId":101534,"journal":{"name":"Banque de France Research Paper Series","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determinants of Banks’ Liquidity: A French Perspective on Interactions between Market and Regulatory Requirements\",\"authors\":\"O. de Bandt, celine lecarpentier, C. Pouvelle\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3707993\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper investigates the impact of solvency and liquidity regulation as well as market shocks on banks’ balance sheet structure It contributes in particular to the debate on the use of liquidity buffers by banks, as initiated by Goodhart (2008)s “last taxiǥ argument The volatility of long-term markets observed during the Covid-19 pandemic shows that periods of sharp increase in risk aversion still result in liquidity strains for banks The latter react differently depending on the diversity of their funding sources and their risk profile Indeed, during a crisis, due to interactions between funding and market liquidity, as well as regulatory constraints, one may wonder whether banks may increase or decrease liquidity According to a simple portfolio allocation model banks'liquidity increases when the regulatory constraint is binding, as banks hoard extra liquidity, while they do not if the regulatory constraint is not binding We show that in times of crisis, measured by large deviations of a financial variable capturing international markets’ risk aversion, French banks actually decreased the liquidity coefficient, with our results mostly driven by less liquid banks However, while we do find that the solvency ratio has a weakly significant effect on the liquidity coefficient, we were not able to establish a firm causal relationship between the two variables on the basis of Granger causality tests © 2020 Elsevier B V\",\"PeriodicalId\":101534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Banque de France Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Banque de France Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3707993\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Banque de France Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3707993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

本文调查了偿付能力和流动性监管以及市场冲击对银行资产负债表结构的影响,它特别有助于对银行使用流动性缓冲的辩论。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间观察到的长期市场波动表明,风险厌恶情绪急剧上升的时期仍会导致银行的流动性紧张,后者的反应因其资金来源和风险状况的多样性而异。事实上,在危机期间,由于资金和市场流动性之间的相互作用,以及监管约束,有人可能想知道银行是否会增加或减少流动性根据一个简单的投资组合配置模型,当监管约束具有约束力时,银行的流动性会增加,因为银行会囤积额外的流动性,而如果监管约束不具有约束力,它们就不会增加流动性。我们表明,在危机时期,通过捕捉国际市场风险厌恶的金融变量的大偏差来衡量,法国银行实际上降低了流动性系数。然而,虽然我们确实发现偿付能力比率对流动性系数有微弱的显著影响,但我们无法在格兰杰因果检验的基础上建立两个变量之间的牢固因果关系©2020 Elsevier B V
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Determinants of Banks’ Liquidity: A French Perspective on Interactions between Market and Regulatory Requirements
The paper investigates the impact of solvency and liquidity regulation as well as market shocks on banks’ balance sheet structure It contributes in particular to the debate on the use of liquidity buffers by banks, as initiated by Goodhart (2008)s “last taxiǥ argument The volatility of long-term markets observed during the Covid-19 pandemic shows that periods of sharp increase in risk aversion still result in liquidity strains for banks The latter react differently depending on the diversity of their funding sources and their risk profile Indeed, during a crisis, due to interactions between funding and market liquidity, as well as regulatory constraints, one may wonder whether banks may increase or decrease liquidity According to a simple portfolio allocation model banks'liquidity increases when the regulatory constraint is binding, as banks hoard extra liquidity, while they do not if the regulatory constraint is not binding We show that in times of crisis, measured by large deviations of a financial variable capturing international markets’ risk aversion, French banks actually decreased the liquidity coefficient, with our results mostly driven by less liquid banks However, while we do find that the solvency ratio has a weakly significant effect on the liquidity coefficient, we were not able to establish a firm causal relationship between the two variables on the basis of Granger causality tests © 2020 Elsevier B V
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Web Scraping Housing Prices in Real-time: the Covid-19 Crisis in the UK Firms’ Inflation Expectations: New Evidence from France Does one (Unconventional) Size Fit All? Effects of the ECB's Unconventional Monetary Policies on the Euro Area Economies Downward Interest Rate Rigidity Inflation tolerance ranges in the New Keynesian model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1