W. Hanna, Bander Marta, Bander Dorota, Biront Aleksandra, Zeair Samir, Wawrzynowicz-Syczewska Marta
{"title":"肝移植前后维生素D水平","authors":"W. Hanna, Bander Marta, Bander Dorota, Biront Aleksandra, Zeair Samir, Wawrzynowicz-Syczewska Marta","doi":"10.23937/2572-4045.1510040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Vitamin D deficiency can cause many health problems and higher mortality. Chronic liver disease impairs vitamin D status by various mechanisms. The aim of our study was to estimate and directly compare vitamin D status in liver recipients before and within six months after LT to see whether there is an impact of restoration of proper liver function on 25(OH)D concentration. Patients and methods: Serum 25(OH)D concentration was determined and compared in the group of 110 adult patients before and within six months after LT. Measures performed right before transplantation were related to the etiology of liver disease, stage of cirrhosis and a season when the examination was done. 25(OH)D in the study group was also compared to the vitamin D concentration in the control group of 110 healthy persons matching the patients with respect to the age (p = 0.16), sex (p = 0.18) and body weight (p = 0.12). 25(OH)D concentration below 20 ng/mL was considered deficient, between 20 and 30 ng/ mL insufficient and > 30 ng/mL sufficient. Frequencies of some clinical episodes like fractures, infections, deaths and diabetes mellitus were compared between groups. Results: 25(OH)D concentration was significantly higher in the study group compared to the control group (20.83 + 13.48 vs. 14.8 + 8.39, p = 0.0001). There was a significant impact of summer-autumn season on better 25(OH)D concentration both in the study group and in the controls. The lowest concentration of vitamin D in the study group before LT was noted in alcoholic liver disease compared to the other etiologies (15.56 + 10.42 vs. 23.61 + 14.13, p = 0.002). The mean 25(OH)D concentration in the study group significantly improved after LT (27.37 + 12.5 vs. 20.83 + 13.48, p = 0.00001), but still more than 50% of recipients were significantly deficient. Conclusions: Vitamin D deficiency is ubiquitous. Liver insufficiency does not have much impact on vitamin D status. Patients with chronic liver disease as well as healthy subjects require regular vitamin D monitoring and supplementation when appropriate. Patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis and the end-stage disease are in a special need. After LT concentration of vitamin D improves, but more than 50% of the recipients require either proper prophylaxis or treatment.","PeriodicalId":120880,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Transplantation Research and Medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vitamin D Status before and after Liver Transplantation\",\"authors\":\"W. Hanna, Bander Marta, Bander Dorota, Biront Aleksandra, Zeair Samir, Wawrzynowicz-Syczewska Marta\",\"doi\":\"10.23937/2572-4045.1510040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Vitamin D deficiency can cause many health problems and higher mortality. Chronic liver disease impairs vitamin D status by various mechanisms. The aim of our study was to estimate and directly compare vitamin D status in liver recipients before and within six months after LT to see whether there is an impact of restoration of proper liver function on 25(OH)D concentration. Patients and methods: Serum 25(OH)D concentration was determined and compared in the group of 110 adult patients before and within six months after LT. Measures performed right before transplantation were related to the etiology of liver disease, stage of cirrhosis and a season when the examination was done. 25(OH)D in the study group was also compared to the vitamin D concentration in the control group of 110 healthy persons matching the patients with respect to the age (p = 0.16), sex (p = 0.18) and body weight (p = 0.12). 25(OH)D concentration below 20 ng/mL was considered deficient, between 20 and 30 ng/ mL insufficient and > 30 ng/mL sufficient. Frequencies of some clinical episodes like fractures, infections, deaths and diabetes mellitus were compared between groups. Results: 25(OH)D concentration was significantly higher in the study group compared to the control group (20.83 + 13.48 vs. 14.8 + 8.39, p = 0.0001). There was a significant impact of summer-autumn season on better 25(OH)D concentration both in the study group and in the controls. The lowest concentration of vitamin D in the study group before LT was noted in alcoholic liver disease compared to the other etiologies (15.56 + 10.42 vs. 23.61 + 14.13, p = 0.002). The mean 25(OH)D concentration in the study group significantly improved after LT (27.37 + 12.5 vs. 20.83 + 13.48, p = 0.00001), but still more than 50% of recipients were significantly deficient. Conclusions: Vitamin D deficiency is ubiquitous. Liver insufficiency does not have much impact on vitamin D status. Patients with chronic liver disease as well as healthy subjects require regular vitamin D monitoring and supplementation when appropriate. Patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis and the end-stage disease are in a special need. After LT concentration of vitamin D improves, but more than 50% of the recipients require either proper prophylaxis or treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":120880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Transplantation Research and Medicine\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Transplantation Research and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23937/2572-4045.1510040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Transplantation Research and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2572-4045.1510040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
背景:维生素D缺乏会导致许多健康问题和更高的死亡率。慢性肝病通过多种机制损害维生素D的状态。我们研究的目的是估计和直接比较肝移植前和术后6个月内肝脏受体的维生素D状态,以了解肝功能恢复是否对25(OH)D浓度有影响。患者和方法:对110例成年患者在肝移植前和移植后6个月内的血清25(OH)D浓度进行测定和比较。移植前进行的测量与肝病的病因、肝硬化分期和检查时的季节有关。并将研究组的25(OH)D与对照组110名与患者年龄(p = 0.16)、性别(p = 0.18)、体重(p = 0.12)相匹配的健康人的维生素D浓度进行比较。25(OH)D浓度低于20 ng/mL为不足,20 ~ 30 ng/mL为不足,> 30 ng/mL为充足。比较两组间骨折、感染、死亡、糖尿病等临床事件的发生频率。结果:研究组25(OH)D浓度显著高于对照组(20.83 + 13.48 vs. 14.8 + 8.39, p = 0.0001)。在研究组和对照组中,夏秋季节对更好的25(OH)D浓度有显著影响。与其他病因相比,LT前研究组中酒精性肝病患者维生素D浓度最低(15.56 + 10.42 vs. 23.61 + 14.13, p = 0.002)。研究组25(OH)D的平均浓度在LT后明显改善(27.37 + 12.5 vs. 20.83 + 13.48, p = 0.00001),但仍有超过50%的受体明显缺乏。结论:维生素D缺乏症普遍存在。肝功能不全对维生素D水平没有太大影响。慢性肝病患者和健康受试者需要定期监测维生素D,并在适当时补充维生素D。酒精性肝硬化和终末期肝病患者有特殊需要。肝移植后,维生素D浓度有所改善,但超过50%的接受者需要适当的预防或治疗。
Vitamin D Status before and after Liver Transplantation
Background: Vitamin D deficiency can cause many health problems and higher mortality. Chronic liver disease impairs vitamin D status by various mechanisms. The aim of our study was to estimate and directly compare vitamin D status in liver recipients before and within six months after LT to see whether there is an impact of restoration of proper liver function on 25(OH)D concentration. Patients and methods: Serum 25(OH)D concentration was determined and compared in the group of 110 adult patients before and within six months after LT. Measures performed right before transplantation were related to the etiology of liver disease, stage of cirrhosis and a season when the examination was done. 25(OH)D in the study group was also compared to the vitamin D concentration in the control group of 110 healthy persons matching the patients with respect to the age (p = 0.16), sex (p = 0.18) and body weight (p = 0.12). 25(OH)D concentration below 20 ng/mL was considered deficient, between 20 and 30 ng/ mL insufficient and > 30 ng/mL sufficient. Frequencies of some clinical episodes like fractures, infections, deaths and diabetes mellitus were compared between groups. Results: 25(OH)D concentration was significantly higher in the study group compared to the control group (20.83 + 13.48 vs. 14.8 + 8.39, p = 0.0001). There was a significant impact of summer-autumn season on better 25(OH)D concentration both in the study group and in the controls. The lowest concentration of vitamin D in the study group before LT was noted in alcoholic liver disease compared to the other etiologies (15.56 + 10.42 vs. 23.61 + 14.13, p = 0.002). The mean 25(OH)D concentration in the study group significantly improved after LT (27.37 + 12.5 vs. 20.83 + 13.48, p = 0.00001), but still more than 50% of recipients were significantly deficient. Conclusions: Vitamin D deficiency is ubiquitous. Liver insufficiency does not have much impact on vitamin D status. Patients with chronic liver disease as well as healthy subjects require regular vitamin D monitoring and supplementation when appropriate. Patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis and the end-stage disease are in a special need. After LT concentration of vitamin D improves, but more than 50% of the recipients require either proper prophylaxis or treatment.