从学习风格看,数字头像和思维对共享模型的数学学习实验

Lukman Hakim Muhaimin, Ahmad Mukhibin, M. Mitrayana, D. Dasari
{"title":"从学习风格看,数字头像和思维对共享模型的数学学习实验","authors":"Lukman Hakim Muhaimin, Ahmad Mukhibin, M. Mitrayana, D. Dasari","doi":"10.20961/jmme.v12i2.67990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the effect of the NHT and TPS learning models on mathematics learning outcomes, the impact of student learning styles on mathematics learning outcomes, and the result of the interaction of learning models and student learning styles on mathematics learning outcomes. This type of quantitative research with a quasi-experimental design. The research sample consisted of two classes (experimental and control) which were taken using Cluster Random Sampling from the population of all course VIII students of SMP 4 Muhammadiyah Surakarta in the academic year 2021/2022. Data collection techniques with questionnaires and tests. Before the research, a balance test was conducted to determine whether the two samples had the same initial abilities. The normality test and homogeneity test are prerequisite analysis tests in this study. The data analysis technique using two-way cell analysis of variance is different, with a significance level of 5%. The results showed that the NHT and TPS learning models affected mathematics learning outcomes. The mathematics learning outcomes of students who were given the NHT learning model tended to be better than those who were given the TPS learning model. Learning styles affect the results of learning mathematics. Students with an auditory learning style get better learning results than visual and kinesthetic learning styles. The interaction between the NHT and TPS learning models on mathematics learning outcomes in terms of student learning styles","PeriodicalId":178617,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mathematical Learning Experiment Using Numbered Heads Together And Think Pair Share Models, Examined From The Learning Style\",\"authors\":\"Lukman Hakim Muhaimin, Ahmad Mukhibin, M. Mitrayana, D. Dasari\",\"doi\":\"10.20961/jmme.v12i2.67990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to determine the effect of the NHT and TPS learning models on mathematics learning outcomes, the impact of student learning styles on mathematics learning outcomes, and the result of the interaction of learning models and student learning styles on mathematics learning outcomes. This type of quantitative research with a quasi-experimental design. The research sample consisted of two classes (experimental and control) which were taken using Cluster Random Sampling from the population of all course VIII students of SMP 4 Muhammadiyah Surakarta in the academic year 2021/2022. Data collection techniques with questionnaires and tests. Before the research, a balance test was conducted to determine whether the two samples had the same initial abilities. The normality test and homogeneity test are prerequisite analysis tests in this study. The data analysis technique using two-way cell analysis of variance is different, with a significance level of 5%. The results showed that the NHT and TPS learning models affected mathematics learning outcomes. The mathematics learning outcomes of students who were given the NHT learning model tended to be better than those who were given the TPS learning model. Learning styles affect the results of learning mathematics. Students with an auditory learning style get better learning results than visual and kinesthetic learning styles. The interaction between the NHT and TPS learning models on mathematics learning outcomes in terms of student learning styles\",\"PeriodicalId\":178617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20961/jmme.v12i2.67990\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20961/jmme.v12i2.67990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨NHT和TPS学习模式对数学学习成果的影响,学生学习风格对数学学习成果的影响,以及学习模式和学生学习风格的交互作用对数学学习成果的影响。这种类型的定量研究具有准实验设计。研究样本包括两个班级(实验组和对照组),采用整群随机抽样方法从2021/2022学年穆罕默迪亚苏拉塔中学4年级所有八课程学生中抽取。采用问卷调查和测试的数据收集技术。在研究之前,我们进行了一个平衡测试,以确定两个样本是否具有相同的初始能力。正态性检验和齐性检验是本研究的前提分析检验。数据分析技术采用双向细胞方差分析不同,显著性水平为5%。结果表明,NHT和TPS学习模式对数学学习结果有影响。采用NHT学习模式的学生数学学习成绩优于采用TPS学习模式的学生。学习风格影响数学学习的结果。听觉学习风格的学生比视觉和动觉学习风格的学生获得更好的学习效果。NHT和TPS学习模式在学生学习风格方面对数学学习成果的交互作用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mathematical Learning Experiment Using Numbered Heads Together And Think Pair Share Models, Examined From The Learning Style
This study aims to determine the effect of the NHT and TPS learning models on mathematics learning outcomes, the impact of student learning styles on mathematics learning outcomes, and the result of the interaction of learning models and student learning styles on mathematics learning outcomes. This type of quantitative research with a quasi-experimental design. The research sample consisted of two classes (experimental and control) which were taken using Cluster Random Sampling from the population of all course VIII students of SMP 4 Muhammadiyah Surakarta in the academic year 2021/2022. Data collection techniques with questionnaires and tests. Before the research, a balance test was conducted to determine whether the two samples had the same initial abilities. The normality test and homogeneity test are prerequisite analysis tests in this study. The data analysis technique using two-way cell analysis of variance is different, with a significance level of 5%. The results showed that the NHT and TPS learning models affected mathematics learning outcomes. The mathematics learning outcomes of students who were given the NHT learning model tended to be better than those who were given the TPS learning model. Learning styles affect the results of learning mathematics. Students with an auditory learning style get better learning results than visual and kinesthetic learning styles. The interaction between the NHT and TPS learning models on mathematics learning outcomes in terms of student learning styles
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the students’ engagement in the process of learning Mathematics using a Flipped-classroom approach to Trigonometry Mathematics Achievement - Intelligence Quotient (IQ): A Study of Simple Relations in Class 10 High School Students The Analysis Of Parental Participation In Improving Children's Learning Motivation During The Covid-19 Pandemic Analysis of Metacognitive Ability in Mathematics Problem Solving of SMA Students at Ngemplak Boyolali A Systematic Literature Review on Mathematics Mobile Applications in Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1