MAGI:使用规则和对称的基于类比的编码

R. W. Ferguson
{"title":"MAGI:使用规则和对称的基于类比的编码","authors":"R. W. Ferguson","doi":"10.4324/9781315789354-49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Analogy has always been considered a mechanism for interrelating distinct parts of the world, but it is perhaps just as important to consider how analogy might be used to break the world into comprehensible parts. The MAGI program uses the Structure-Mapping Engine (SME) to flexibly and reliably match a description against itself. The resulting mapping pulls out the two maximally consistent parts of the given description . MAGI then divides out the parts of the mapping and categorizes the mapping as symmetrical or regular . These parts may then be used as the basis for new comparisons . We theorize that MAGI models how people use symmetry and regularity to facilitate the encoding task . We demonstrate this with three sets of examples . First, we show how MAGI can augment traditional axis detection and reference frame adjustment in geometric figures . Next, we demonstrate how MAGI detects visual and functional symmetry in logic circuits, where symmetry of form aids encoding symmetry of function . Finally, to emphasize that regularity and symmetry detection is not simply visual, we show how MAGI models some aspects of expectation generation in story understanding . In general, MAGI shows symmetry and regularity to be not only pretty, but also cognitively valuable . Introduction : Why regularity and symmetry aren't (just) pretty Regularity and symmetry are phenomena strangely divided between disciplines . Researchers in computer vision (Witkin & Tenenbaum, 1983) and perceptual psychology (Palmer, 1985 ; Rock, 1983) have long recognized regularity and especially symmetry as important, but have understood it strictly as a perceptual effect . Although researchers in analogy might easily agree that symmetry and regularity must involve some form of self-similarity, this community has produced little work in the area, perhaps due to an emphasis on problem solving and learning, rather than encoding . This paper is an attempt to bridge this gap by recasting symmetry and regularity as analogical processes that operate on structured but undivided representations in the world. There are two central theoretical claims in the MAGI model . The first is that regularity and symmetry are like analogy--they work by mapping a maximal common set of structurally interconnected relations, but within a Ronald W. Ferguson Qualitative Reasoning Group Institute for the Learning Sciences Northwestern University Evanston, Illinois 60202 fergusongils .nwu .edu single description instead of between separate base and target descriptions . The second is illustrated by Figure 1 . Regularity and symmetry are not strictly perceptual, but may be found in any task involving the encoding of relational knowledge structures . For example, regularity and symmetry may be found imperfect figures (a), in diagrams (b), or in story narratives (c). To support these two claims, we have constructed MAGI, a system that uses SME to detect regularity and symmetry, and can handle all","PeriodicalId":393936,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MAGI: Analogy-based Encoding Using Regularity and Symmetry\",\"authors\":\"R. W. Ferguson\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315789354-49\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Analogy has always been considered a mechanism for interrelating distinct parts of the world, but it is perhaps just as important to consider how analogy might be used to break the world into comprehensible parts. The MAGI program uses the Structure-Mapping Engine (SME) to flexibly and reliably match a description against itself. The resulting mapping pulls out the two maximally consistent parts of the given description . MAGI then divides out the parts of the mapping and categorizes the mapping as symmetrical or regular . These parts may then be used as the basis for new comparisons . We theorize that MAGI models how people use symmetry and regularity to facilitate the encoding task . We demonstrate this with three sets of examples . First, we show how MAGI can augment traditional axis detection and reference frame adjustment in geometric figures . Next, we demonstrate how MAGI detects visual and functional symmetry in logic circuits, where symmetry of form aids encoding symmetry of function . Finally, to emphasize that regularity and symmetry detection is not simply visual, we show how MAGI models some aspects of expectation generation in story understanding . In general, MAGI shows symmetry and regularity to be not only pretty, but also cognitively valuable . Introduction : Why regularity and symmetry aren't (just) pretty Regularity and symmetry are phenomena strangely divided between disciplines . Researchers in computer vision (Witkin & Tenenbaum, 1983) and perceptual psychology (Palmer, 1985 ; Rock, 1983) have long recognized regularity and especially symmetry as important, but have understood it strictly as a perceptual effect . Although researchers in analogy might easily agree that symmetry and regularity must involve some form of self-similarity, this community has produced little work in the area, perhaps due to an emphasis on problem solving and learning, rather than encoding . This paper is an attempt to bridge this gap by recasting symmetry and regularity as analogical processes that operate on structured but undivided representations in the world. There are two central theoretical claims in the MAGI model . The first is that regularity and symmetry are like analogy--they work by mapping a maximal common set of structurally interconnected relations, but within a Ronald W. Ferguson Qualitative Reasoning Group Institute for the Learning Sciences Northwestern University Evanston, Illinois 60202 fergusongils .nwu .edu single description instead of between separate base and target descriptions . The second is illustrated by Figure 1 . Regularity and symmetry are not strictly perceptual, but may be found in any task involving the encoding of relational knowledge structures . For example, regularity and symmetry may be found imperfect figures (a), in diagrams (b), or in story narratives (c). To support these two claims, we have constructed MAGI, a system that uses SME to detect regularity and symmetry, and can handle all\",\"PeriodicalId\":393936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315789354-49\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315789354-49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

类比一直被认为是世界上不同部分相互联系的机制,但考虑如何使用类比将世界分解为可理解的部分可能同样重要。MAGI程序使用结构映射引擎(SME)灵活可靠地匹配描述与自身。生成的映射将提取给定描述的两个最一致的部分。然后,MAGI划分出映射的各个部分,并将映射分类为对称或规则。这些部分可以作为新的比较的基础。我们的理论是,MAGI模拟了人们如何使用对称性和规律性来促进编码任务。我们用三组示例来演示这一点。首先,我们展示了MAGI如何在几何图形中增强传统的轴检测和参考帧调整。接下来,我们将演示MAGI如何检测逻辑电路中的视觉和功能对称性,其中形式对称性有助于编码功能对称性。最后,为了强调规律性和对称性检测不仅仅是视觉上的,我们展示了MAGI如何对故事理解中期望生成的某些方面进行建模。总的来说,MAGI显示对称性和规律性不仅漂亮,而且在认知上也很有价值。为什么规律和对称不(只是)漂亮规律和对称是在不同学科之间奇怪地划分的现象。计算机视觉(Witkin & Tenenbaum, 1983)和感知心理学(Palmer, 1985;Rock(1983)早就认识到规律性,尤其是对称性的重要性,但严格地把它理解为一种感知效应。尽管类比领域的研究人员可能很容易同意对称性和规律性必然涉及某种形式的自相似性,但这个社区在这一领域的工作很少,可能是由于强调解决问题和学习,而不是编码。本文试图通过将对称和规则重新定义为在世界上结构化但不可分割的表示上操作的类比过程来弥合这一差距。在MAGI模型中有两个核心理论主张。第一个是,规律性和对称性就像类比一样——它们通过映射一个最大的共同的结构上相互联系的关系集来工作,但在罗纳德·w·弗格森定性推理小组研究所,西北大学学习科学,伊利诺伊州埃文斯顿,60202弗格森·弗格森·吉尔斯.nwu .edu单个描述,而不是单独的基础和目标描述。第二种方法如图1所示。规则性和对称性并不是严格意义上的感性概念,而是存在于任何涉及关系知识结构编码的任务中。例如,不完美的图形(a)、图表(b)或故事叙述(c)中可能存在规律性和对称性。为了支持这两种说法,我们构建了MAGI,一个使用SME检测规律性和对称性的系统,并且可以处理所有这些
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MAGI: Analogy-based Encoding Using Regularity and Symmetry
Analogy has always been considered a mechanism for interrelating distinct parts of the world, but it is perhaps just as important to consider how analogy might be used to break the world into comprehensible parts. The MAGI program uses the Structure-Mapping Engine (SME) to flexibly and reliably match a description against itself. The resulting mapping pulls out the two maximally consistent parts of the given description . MAGI then divides out the parts of the mapping and categorizes the mapping as symmetrical or regular . These parts may then be used as the basis for new comparisons . We theorize that MAGI models how people use symmetry and regularity to facilitate the encoding task . We demonstrate this with three sets of examples . First, we show how MAGI can augment traditional axis detection and reference frame adjustment in geometric figures . Next, we demonstrate how MAGI detects visual and functional symmetry in logic circuits, where symmetry of form aids encoding symmetry of function . Finally, to emphasize that regularity and symmetry detection is not simply visual, we show how MAGI models some aspects of expectation generation in story understanding . In general, MAGI shows symmetry and regularity to be not only pretty, but also cognitively valuable . Introduction : Why regularity and symmetry aren't (just) pretty Regularity and symmetry are phenomena strangely divided between disciplines . Researchers in computer vision (Witkin & Tenenbaum, 1983) and perceptual psychology (Palmer, 1985 ; Rock, 1983) have long recognized regularity and especially symmetry as important, but have understood it strictly as a perceptual effect . Although researchers in analogy might easily agree that symmetry and regularity must involve some form of self-similarity, this community has produced little work in the area, perhaps due to an emphasis on problem solving and learning, rather than encoding . This paper is an attempt to bridge this gap by recasting symmetry and regularity as analogical processes that operate on structured but undivided representations in the world. There are two central theoretical claims in the MAGI model . The first is that regularity and symmetry are like analogy--they work by mapping a maximal common set of structurally interconnected relations, but within a Ronald W. Ferguson Qualitative Reasoning Group Institute for the Learning Sciences Northwestern University Evanston, Illinois 60202 fergusongils .nwu .edu single description instead of between separate base and target descriptions . The second is illustrated by Figure 1 . Regularity and symmetry are not strictly perceptual, but may be found in any task involving the encoding of relational knowledge structures . For example, regularity and symmetry may be found imperfect figures (a), in diagrams (b), or in story narratives (c). To support these two claims, we have constructed MAGI, a system that uses SME to detect regularity and symmetry, and can handle all
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Power of Negative Thinking: The Central Role of Modus Tollens in Human Cognition Multiple learning mechanisms within implicit learning Artificial Evolution of Syntactic Aptitude A Study of Diagrammatic Reasoning from Verbal and Gestural Data Improving Design with Artifact History
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1