自然理论社会理论大理论持有批判性的自然理论

Oliver Schlaudt
{"title":"自然理论社会理论大理论持有批判性的自然理论","authors":"Oliver Schlaudt","doi":"10.1515/zksp-2014-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Comment on the essay by F. Engster and A. Schröder on the naturalization of nature and society with a view to a critical theory of nature. As a clarification, I suggest the following classification of possible meanings of the term “critical theory of nature”: (1a) historical-materialist historiography of science in a descriptive sense; (1b) historical-materialist philosophy of science as a normative approach in epistemology; (2) a normative theory of human interventions in nature. Identifying the approach of Engster and Schröder with program (1b), I express two objections: The first one concerns the explanatory value of the thesis that modern society, the modern idea of nature and the neat separation of pure nature and pure society all originate (in a logical sense) in quantification. Secondly, I dispute the thesis that there is a real parallel between the construction DOI 10.1515/zksp-2014-0006 ZKSP 2014; 1(1): 148–161","PeriodicalId":250691,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie","volume":"170 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Naturtheorie, Gesellschaftstheorie, Messtheorie? Überlegungen zu einer kritischen Naturtheorie\",\"authors\":\"Oliver Schlaudt\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/zksp-2014-0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Comment on the essay by F. Engster and A. Schröder on the naturalization of nature and society with a view to a critical theory of nature. As a clarification, I suggest the following classification of possible meanings of the term “critical theory of nature”: (1a) historical-materialist historiography of science in a descriptive sense; (1b) historical-materialist philosophy of science as a normative approach in epistemology; (2) a normative theory of human interventions in nature. Identifying the approach of Engster and Schröder with program (1b), I express two objections: The first one concerns the explanatory value of the thesis that modern society, the modern idea of nature and the neat separation of pure nature and pure society all originate (in a logical sense) in quantification. Secondly, I dispute the thesis that there is a real parallel between the construction DOI 10.1515/zksp-2014-0006 ZKSP 2014; 1(1): 148–161\",\"PeriodicalId\":250691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie\",\"volume\":\"170 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/zksp-2014-0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zksp-2014-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从自然批判理论的角度对F.恩斯特和a . Schröder关于自然和社会的自然化的文章进行评论。作为澄清,我建议对“自然批判理论”一词的可能含义进行以下分类:(1a)描述意义上的历史唯物主义科学史学;(1b)作为认识论规范方法的历史唯物主义科学哲学;(2)人类干预自然的规范理论。通过程序(1b)识别恩斯特和Schröder的方法,我表达了两个反对意见:第一个反对意见涉及现代社会,现代自然观念以及纯粹自然和纯粹社会的整洁分离都起源于量化(在逻辑意义上)这一论点的解释价值。其次,我对DOI 10.1515/ ZKSP -2014-0006 ZKSP 2014之间存在真正平行的论点提出异议;1 (1): 148 - 161
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Naturtheorie, Gesellschaftstheorie, Messtheorie? Überlegungen zu einer kritischen Naturtheorie
Comment on the essay by F. Engster and A. Schröder on the naturalization of nature and society with a view to a critical theory of nature. As a clarification, I suggest the following classification of possible meanings of the term “critical theory of nature”: (1a) historical-materialist historiography of science in a descriptive sense; (1b) historical-materialist philosophy of science as a normative approach in epistemology; (2) a normative theory of human interventions in nature. Identifying the approach of Engster and Schröder with program (1b), I express two objections: The first one concerns the explanatory value of the thesis that modern society, the modern idea of nature and the neat separation of pure nature and pure society all originate (in a logical sense) in quantification. Secondly, I dispute the thesis that there is a real parallel between the construction DOI 10.1515/zksp-2014-0006 ZKSP 2014; 1(1): 148–161
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Die Destruktion der Gesellschaftstheorie: Ernesto Laclaus und Chantal Mouffes Versuch einer nicht-essentialistischen Politischen Philosophie Ohne Form kein Inhalt Politics contra the functionalisation of man – Hannah Arendt’s problematic investigation of ideology and labour Between conflict and consensus: Why democracy needs conflicts and why communities should delimit their intensity Die „letzte Sinnlosigkeit“
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1