包容性市场体系发展在促进韧性方面的作用:来自世界宣明会项目的证据

E. Tumusiime, Martha Cruz Zuniga, C. Bass
{"title":"包容性市场体系发展在促进韧性方面的作用:来自世界宣明会项目的证据","authors":"E. Tumusiime, Martha Cruz Zuniga, C. Bass","doi":"10.3362/1755-1986.21-00037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evidence on whether market systems development (MSD) programmes for extremely poor smallholder farmers in low-income countries are associated with resilient outcomes when shocks/stressors appear is limited. We discuss the role of the inclusive MSD (iMSD) approach to generate resilience among vulnerable populations and report empirical evidence from World Vision's project areas (with iMSD activities) and comparison communities in Tanzania and Rwanda. The panel data collected between 2017 and 2021 provide evidence on differences in household-level resilience in the face of COVID-19 shock. Descriptive estimates from the 2021 survey show project households had statistically greater food security, market participation, and perception of being fully/partially recovered than comparison households in both Tanzania and Rwanda. Integration in market systems helped buffer participants. Though food insecurity declined between survey rounds in Tanzania, it worsened in Rwanda, but more so among comparison households. Respondents in Rwanda experienced stricter COVID-19 'lockdowns' and more limited iMSD activities than Tanzanians. © 2022 Practical Action Publishing. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":308609,"journal":{"name":"Enterprise Development & Microfinance","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of inclusive market systems development in promoting resilience: evidence from World Vision projects\",\"authors\":\"E. Tumusiime, Martha Cruz Zuniga, C. Bass\",\"doi\":\"10.3362/1755-1986.21-00037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Evidence on whether market systems development (MSD) programmes for extremely poor smallholder farmers in low-income countries are associated with resilient outcomes when shocks/stressors appear is limited. We discuss the role of the inclusive MSD (iMSD) approach to generate resilience among vulnerable populations and report empirical evidence from World Vision's project areas (with iMSD activities) and comparison communities in Tanzania and Rwanda. The panel data collected between 2017 and 2021 provide evidence on differences in household-level resilience in the face of COVID-19 shock. Descriptive estimates from the 2021 survey show project households had statistically greater food security, market participation, and perception of being fully/partially recovered than comparison households in both Tanzania and Rwanda. Integration in market systems helped buffer participants. Though food insecurity declined between survey rounds in Tanzania, it worsened in Rwanda, but more so among comparison households. Respondents in Rwanda experienced stricter COVID-19 'lockdowns' and more limited iMSD activities than Tanzanians. © 2022 Practical Action Publishing. All rights reserved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":308609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Enterprise Development & Microfinance\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Enterprise Development & Microfinance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3362/1755-1986.21-00037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enterprise Development & Microfinance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3362/1755-1986.21-00037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

关于针对低收入国家极端贫困小农的市场体系发展(MSD)计划是否与冲击/压力因素出现时的弹性结果相关的证据有限。我们讨论了包容性MSD (iMSD)方法在弱势群体中产生复原力的作用,并报告了世界宣明会项目地区(与iMSD活动)的经验证据,并比较了坦桑尼亚和卢旺达的社区。2017年至2021年期间收集的小组数据提供了面对COVID-19冲击时家庭抵御能力差异的证据。2021年调查的描述性估计显示,在统计上,与坦桑尼亚和卢旺达的比较家庭相比,项目家庭的粮食安全、市场参与度和完全/部分恢复的感觉都更高。市场体系的一体化有助于缓冲参与者。虽然坦桑尼亚的粮食不安全状况在两次调查之间有所下降,但卢旺达的情况却恶化了,但在比较家庭中情况更为严重。与坦桑尼亚人相比,卢旺达的受访者经历了更严格的COVID-19“封锁”和更有限的iMSD活动。©2022实践行动出版社。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Role of inclusive market systems development in promoting resilience: evidence from World Vision projects
Evidence on whether market systems development (MSD) programmes for extremely poor smallholder farmers in low-income countries are associated with resilient outcomes when shocks/stressors appear is limited. We discuss the role of the inclusive MSD (iMSD) approach to generate resilience among vulnerable populations and report empirical evidence from World Vision's project areas (with iMSD activities) and comparison communities in Tanzania and Rwanda. The panel data collected between 2017 and 2021 provide evidence on differences in household-level resilience in the face of COVID-19 shock. Descriptive estimates from the 2021 survey show project households had statistically greater food security, market participation, and perception of being fully/partially recovered than comparison households in both Tanzania and Rwanda. Integration in market systems helped buffer participants. Though food insecurity declined between survey rounds in Tanzania, it worsened in Rwanda, but more so among comparison households. Respondents in Rwanda experienced stricter COVID-19 'lockdowns' and more limited iMSD activities than Tanzanians. © 2022 Practical Action Publishing. All rights reserved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring the economic and environmental effects of food waste in Uruguayan households Preserving food without creating plastic pollution: A primer on progress in developed and low- to middle-income countries Assessing the measurement methods of post-harvest food loss and waste: opportunities and challenges Exploring the complex relationships between food loss and waste, climate change, and the environment to support informed sustainable food system transformation decisions with a focus on sub-Saharan Africa Formal microsaving: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review of its exogenous determinants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1