LEDBAT-MP——“低于最佳努力”在并发多路径传输中的应用

Hakim Adhari, Sebastian Werner, T. Dreibholz, E. Rathgeb
{"title":"LEDBAT-MP——“低于最佳努力”在并发多路径传输中的应用","authors":"Hakim Adhari, Sebastian Werner, T. Dreibholz, E. Rathgeb","doi":"10.1109/WAINA.2014.125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Internet is based on best effort communication, i.e. It tries to deliver packets but does not provide any guarantees. A transport protocol can make use of this best effort service to provide a suitable service to its applications. Also, its congestion control is responsible for a fair distribution of the resources within the Internet. However, background data transfer applications (like file sharing or update fetching) do not require \"best effort\", they in fact could use a \"lower-than-best-effort\" service to leave resources to more important applications if needed. For this purpose, the Low Extra Delay Background Transport (LEDBAT) algorithm has been standardized by the IETF. Nowadays, multi-homing is becoming increasingly common in modern networks and several approaches to exploit this feature (e.g. CMT-SCTP, MPTCP) have evolved that are able to combine resources of multiple paths. For background traffic oriented algorithms like LEDBAT, this feature could be of great use, too, i.e. By increasing the overall bandwidth while shifting the transmission away from paths which are used by other flows. This could be particularly useful for non-critical bulk transfers in data centres. In this paper, we introduce our approach LEDBAT for Multi-Path - denoted as LEDBAT-MP - and analyze its performance by simulations. With this paper, we want to highlight some generic design questions and start a discussion on how a solid universal background multi-path congestion control strategy should behave.","PeriodicalId":424903,"journal":{"name":"2014 28th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LEDBAT-MP -- On the Application of \\\"Lower-than-Best-Effort\\\" for Concurrent Multipath Transfer\",\"authors\":\"Hakim Adhari, Sebastian Werner, T. Dreibholz, E. Rathgeb\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WAINA.2014.125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Internet is based on best effort communication, i.e. It tries to deliver packets but does not provide any guarantees. A transport protocol can make use of this best effort service to provide a suitable service to its applications. Also, its congestion control is responsible for a fair distribution of the resources within the Internet. However, background data transfer applications (like file sharing or update fetching) do not require \\\"best effort\\\", they in fact could use a \\\"lower-than-best-effort\\\" service to leave resources to more important applications if needed. For this purpose, the Low Extra Delay Background Transport (LEDBAT) algorithm has been standardized by the IETF. Nowadays, multi-homing is becoming increasingly common in modern networks and several approaches to exploit this feature (e.g. CMT-SCTP, MPTCP) have evolved that are able to combine resources of multiple paths. For background traffic oriented algorithms like LEDBAT, this feature could be of great use, too, i.e. By increasing the overall bandwidth while shifting the transmission away from paths which are used by other flows. This could be particularly useful for non-critical bulk transfers in data centres. In this paper, we introduce our approach LEDBAT for Multi-Path - denoted as LEDBAT-MP - and analyze its performance by simulations. With this paper, we want to highlight some generic design questions and start a discussion on how a solid universal background multi-path congestion control strategy should behave.\",\"PeriodicalId\":424903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 28th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 28th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WAINA.2014.125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 28th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WAINA.2014.125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

因特网是基于尽力通信的,也就是说,它尽力传送数据包,但不提供任何保证。传输协议可以利用这种“尽力而为”服务为其应用程序提供合适的服务。此外,它的拥塞控制负责公平分配互联网内的资源。然而,后台数据传输应用程序(如文件共享或更新获取)不需要“尽最大努力”,事实上,它们可以使用“低于最大努力”的服务,在需要时将资源留给更重要的应用程序。为此,IETF对低额外延迟背景传输(LEDBAT)算法进行了标准化。如今,多归巢在现代网络中变得越来越普遍,并且已经发展了几种利用这一特性的方法(例如CMT-SCTP、MPTCP),这些方法能够组合多个路径的资源。对于像LEDBAT这样的面向后台流量的算法,这个特性也会有很大的用处,即在增加总带宽的同时,将传输从其他流使用的路径上转移开。这对于数据中心的非关键批量传输尤其有用。本文介绍了一种基于多路径的LEDBAT- mp方法,并通过仿真分析了其性能。在本文中,我们想强调一些通用的设计问题,并开始讨论一个坚实的通用背景多路径拥塞控制策略应该如何表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
LEDBAT-MP -- On the Application of "Lower-than-Best-Effort" for Concurrent Multipath Transfer
The Internet is based on best effort communication, i.e. It tries to deliver packets but does not provide any guarantees. A transport protocol can make use of this best effort service to provide a suitable service to its applications. Also, its congestion control is responsible for a fair distribution of the resources within the Internet. However, background data transfer applications (like file sharing or update fetching) do not require "best effort", they in fact could use a "lower-than-best-effort" service to leave resources to more important applications if needed. For this purpose, the Low Extra Delay Background Transport (LEDBAT) algorithm has been standardized by the IETF. Nowadays, multi-homing is becoming increasingly common in modern networks and several approaches to exploit this feature (e.g. CMT-SCTP, MPTCP) have evolved that are able to combine resources of multiple paths. For background traffic oriented algorithms like LEDBAT, this feature could be of great use, too, i.e. By increasing the overall bandwidth while shifting the transmission away from paths which are used by other flows. This could be particularly useful for non-critical bulk transfers in data centres. In this paper, we introduce our approach LEDBAT for Multi-Path - denoted as LEDBAT-MP - and analyze its performance by simulations. With this paper, we want to highlight some generic design questions and start a discussion on how a solid universal background multi-path congestion control strategy should behave.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Internet of Things-Based Model for Smart Water Management Distributed Uncertain Data Mining for Frequent Patterns Satisfying Anti-monotonic Constraints A Secure Framework for Communications in Heterogeneous Networks Dynamic Bandwidth Distribution for Entertainment Vehicular Networks Applications WWF: Web Application Workload Balancing Framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1