低频无人机探地雷达在土壤电导率测绘中的应用分析

Kaijun Wu, Elodie Jacquemin, Loïc Ory, T. Parizel, S. Lambot
{"title":"低频无人机探地雷达在土壤电导率测绘中的应用分析","authors":"Kaijun Wu, Elodie Jacquemin, Loïc Ory, T. Parizel, S. Lambot","doi":"10.1109/iwagpr50767.2021.9843145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we analysed the low-frequency drone-borne ground-penetrating radar (GPR) and full-wave inversion method for soil electrical conductivity characterization. The sensitivity of parameters (the relative dielectric permittivity εr and electrical conductivity σ) is investigated based on the full-wave inversion method. For the full-wave inversion analysis, numerical experiments were conducted within the frequency range of 15–45 MHz. The results show that the soil surface reflexion is more sensitive to the soil electrical conductivity than the soil permittivity to be retrieved using full-wave inversion within this frequency range, with a sensitivity depth of around 0.5 m. Yet, the permittivity also affects the results. For the field experiment, a 5-meter long dipole was mounted on a drone to provide the low frequency range of 15–45 MHz. The measurements were conducted during two different days. The conductivity maps obtained by the drone-borne GPR and by electromagnetic induction (EMI) are presented for comparison. The agreement between the two drone-GPR experiments demonstrated the feasibility of soil conductivity mapping using drone-borne GPR and full-wave inversion. Nevertheless, the conductivity maps were opposite in terms of spatial distributions compared to EMI. This was attributed to the different depth sensitivities of the two methods in relation to the local soil pedology.","PeriodicalId":170169,"journal":{"name":"2021 11th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar (IWAGPR)","volume":"453 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Low-frequency Drone-Borne GPR for Soil Electrical Conductivity Mapping\",\"authors\":\"Kaijun Wu, Elodie Jacquemin, Loïc Ory, T. Parizel, S. Lambot\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/iwagpr50767.2021.9843145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, we analysed the low-frequency drone-borne ground-penetrating radar (GPR) and full-wave inversion method for soil electrical conductivity characterization. The sensitivity of parameters (the relative dielectric permittivity εr and electrical conductivity σ) is investigated based on the full-wave inversion method. For the full-wave inversion analysis, numerical experiments were conducted within the frequency range of 15–45 MHz. The results show that the soil surface reflexion is more sensitive to the soil electrical conductivity than the soil permittivity to be retrieved using full-wave inversion within this frequency range, with a sensitivity depth of around 0.5 m. Yet, the permittivity also affects the results. For the field experiment, a 5-meter long dipole was mounted on a drone to provide the low frequency range of 15–45 MHz. The measurements were conducted during two different days. The conductivity maps obtained by the drone-borne GPR and by electromagnetic induction (EMI) are presented for comparison. The agreement between the two drone-GPR experiments demonstrated the feasibility of soil conductivity mapping using drone-borne GPR and full-wave inversion. Nevertheless, the conductivity maps were opposite in terms of spatial distributions compared to EMI. This was attributed to the different depth sensitivities of the two methods in relation to the local soil pedology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 11th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar (IWAGPR)\",\"volume\":\"453 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 11th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar (IWAGPR)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/iwagpr50767.2021.9843145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 11th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar (IWAGPR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/iwagpr50767.2021.9843145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究分析了低频无人机探地雷达(GPR)和全波反演方法在土壤电导率表征中的应用。利用全波反演方法研究了相对介电常数εr和电导率σ的灵敏度。对于全波反演分析,在15-45 MHz的频率范围内进行了数值实验。结果表明,在该频率范围内,土壤表面反射对土壤电导率比全波反演反演的土壤介电常数更敏感,敏感性深度约为0.5 m。然而,介电常数也会影响结果。在现场实验中,在无人机上安装了一个5米长的偶极子,提供15-45 MHz的低频范围。测量是在两天内进行的。给出了无人机探地雷达和电磁感应(EMI)获得的电导率图进行比较。两次无人机探地雷达实验结果一致,证明了利用无人机探地雷达与全波反演进行土壤电导率制图的可行性。然而,电导率图在空间分布方面与EMI相反。这是由于两种方法对当地土壤的深度敏感性不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of Low-frequency Drone-Borne GPR for Soil Electrical Conductivity Mapping
In this study, we analysed the low-frequency drone-borne ground-penetrating radar (GPR) and full-wave inversion method for soil electrical conductivity characterization. The sensitivity of parameters (the relative dielectric permittivity εr and electrical conductivity σ) is investigated based on the full-wave inversion method. For the full-wave inversion analysis, numerical experiments were conducted within the frequency range of 15–45 MHz. The results show that the soil surface reflexion is more sensitive to the soil electrical conductivity than the soil permittivity to be retrieved using full-wave inversion within this frequency range, with a sensitivity depth of around 0.5 m. Yet, the permittivity also affects the results. For the field experiment, a 5-meter long dipole was mounted on a drone to provide the low frequency range of 15–45 MHz. The measurements were conducted during two different days. The conductivity maps obtained by the drone-borne GPR and by electromagnetic induction (EMI) are presented for comparison. The agreement between the two drone-GPR experiments demonstrated the feasibility of soil conductivity mapping using drone-borne GPR and full-wave inversion. Nevertheless, the conductivity maps were opposite in terms of spatial distributions compared to EMI. This was attributed to the different depth sensitivities of the two methods in relation to the local soil pedology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparing Adam and SGD optimizers to train AlexNet for classifying GPR C-scans featuring ancient structures Polarimetric Alpha Angle versus Relative Permittivity with Dual-Polarimetric GPR Experiments GPR Monitoring at the Crypt of Sant’Agnese in Agone Church, Rome, Italy Evaluation of the possibility of using the radio frequency range for the survey of the Great Pyramid Full Waveform Inversion of common offset GPR data using a fast deep learning based forward solver
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1