Guillermo Barahona-Fuentes, Á. H. Ojeda, D. Jérez-Mayorga
{"title":"不同的力量训练方法对力量训练期间和之后肌肉疲劳指标的影响:一个系统的回顾","authors":"Guillermo Barahona-Fuentes, Á. H. Ojeda, D. Jérez-Mayorga","doi":"10.1590/s1980-6574202000030063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The development of strength has shown to be beneficial to sports performance and health. However, during strength training, they also produce alterations in muscle fatigue indicators, leading to a decrease in the ability to generate strength. Despite this, there is still not enough knowledge about the levels of muscle fatigue generated by different methods of strength training and how this information can be integrated into sports planning. Review and analyze the studies existing between January 2009 and January 2019 that have used indicators of muscle fatigue established in the search terms during and after strength training as measurement variables. Evidence acquisition: The study corresponds to a systematic review of previously published studies, following the PRISMA model. Articles published between 2009 and 2019 that measured muscle fatigue indicators during and after strength training were evaluated. The electronic search was conducted through Web of Science, Scopus, Sport Discus, PubMed, and Medline. We included all articles that used a strength protocol and also measured indicators of muscle fatigue and its possible effect on physical performance. Evidence synthesis: A total of 39 articles were found, which were stratified according to the protocol used: (i) plyometric training, (ii) Bodypump® training, (iii) occlusion training, (iv) variable resistance training, (v) conventional strength training, (vi) eccentric strength training, (vii) rest times in strength training and (viii) concurrent training. Conclusion: At the end of the systematic review, it was shown that the different training methodologies for strength development generate increases in muscle fatigue indicators, and the increase generated in the different muscle fatigue indicators depends both on the methodology used and on the type of population, sex, level of training and type of sport. The most-reported indicators are [La], HR and RPE, DOM, MR variation, and ammonium.","PeriodicalId":153884,"journal":{"name":"Motriz: Revista de Educação Física","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of different methods of strength training on indicators of muscle fatigue during and after strength training: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Guillermo Barahona-Fuentes, Á. H. Ojeda, D. Jérez-Mayorga\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/s1980-6574202000030063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The development of strength has shown to be beneficial to sports performance and health. However, during strength training, they also produce alterations in muscle fatigue indicators, leading to a decrease in the ability to generate strength. Despite this, there is still not enough knowledge about the levels of muscle fatigue generated by different methods of strength training and how this information can be integrated into sports planning. Review and analyze the studies existing between January 2009 and January 2019 that have used indicators of muscle fatigue established in the search terms during and after strength training as measurement variables. Evidence acquisition: The study corresponds to a systematic review of previously published studies, following the PRISMA model. Articles published between 2009 and 2019 that measured muscle fatigue indicators during and after strength training were evaluated. The electronic search was conducted through Web of Science, Scopus, Sport Discus, PubMed, and Medline. We included all articles that used a strength protocol and also measured indicators of muscle fatigue and its possible effect on physical performance. Evidence synthesis: A total of 39 articles were found, which were stratified according to the protocol used: (i) plyometric training, (ii) Bodypump® training, (iii) occlusion training, (iv) variable resistance training, (v) conventional strength training, (vi) eccentric strength training, (vii) rest times in strength training and (viii) concurrent training. Conclusion: At the end of the systematic review, it was shown that the different training methodologies for strength development generate increases in muscle fatigue indicators, and the increase generated in the different muscle fatigue indicators depends both on the methodology used and on the type of population, sex, level of training and type of sport. The most-reported indicators are [La], HR and RPE, DOM, MR variation, and ammonium.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Motriz: Revista de Educação Física\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Motriz: Revista de Educação Física\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/s1980-6574202000030063\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Motriz: Revista de Educação Física","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s1980-6574202000030063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
力量的发展已被证明对运动表现和健康有益。然而,在力量训练过程中,它们也会产生肌肉疲劳指标的改变,导致产生力量的能力下降。尽管如此,关于不同的力量训练方法所产生的肌肉疲劳程度,以及如何将这些信息整合到运动计划中,仍然没有足够的知识。回顾和分析2009年1月至2019年1月之间的现有研究,这些研究使用在力量训练期间和之后的搜索词中建立的肌肉疲劳指标作为测量变量。证据获取:该研究符合先前发表的研究的系统综述,遵循PRISMA模型。2009年至2019年间发表的文章对力量训练期间和之后的肌肉疲劳指标进行了评估。电子检索通过Web of Science、Scopus、Sport Discus、PubMed和Medline进行。我们纳入了所有使用力量方案的文章,并测量了肌肉疲劳指标及其对身体表现的可能影响。证据综合:共发现39篇文章,根据使用的方案进行分层:(i)增强训练,(ii) Bodypump®训练,(iii)闭塞训练,(iv)可变阻力训练,(v)常规力量训练,(vi)偏心力量训练,(vii)力量训练中的休息时间和(viii)并行训练。结论:在系统综述的最后,我们发现不同的力量发展训练方法会导致肌肉疲劳指标的增加,而不同肌肉疲劳指标的增加既取决于所使用的方法,也取决于人口类型、性别、训练水平和运动类型。报道最多的指标是[La]、HR和RPE、DOM、MR变化和铵。
Effects of different methods of strength training on indicators of muscle fatigue during and after strength training: a systematic review
Introduction: The development of strength has shown to be beneficial to sports performance and health. However, during strength training, they also produce alterations in muscle fatigue indicators, leading to a decrease in the ability to generate strength. Despite this, there is still not enough knowledge about the levels of muscle fatigue generated by different methods of strength training and how this information can be integrated into sports planning. Review and analyze the studies existing between January 2009 and January 2019 that have used indicators of muscle fatigue established in the search terms during and after strength training as measurement variables. Evidence acquisition: The study corresponds to a systematic review of previously published studies, following the PRISMA model. Articles published between 2009 and 2019 that measured muscle fatigue indicators during and after strength training were evaluated. The electronic search was conducted through Web of Science, Scopus, Sport Discus, PubMed, and Medline. We included all articles that used a strength protocol and also measured indicators of muscle fatigue and its possible effect on physical performance. Evidence synthesis: A total of 39 articles were found, which were stratified according to the protocol used: (i) plyometric training, (ii) Bodypump® training, (iii) occlusion training, (iv) variable resistance training, (v) conventional strength training, (vi) eccentric strength training, (vii) rest times in strength training and (viii) concurrent training. Conclusion: At the end of the systematic review, it was shown that the different training methodologies for strength development generate increases in muscle fatigue indicators, and the increase generated in the different muscle fatigue indicators depends both on the methodology used and on the type of population, sex, level of training and type of sport. The most-reported indicators are [La], HR and RPE, DOM, MR variation, and ammonium.