女性膝关节前侧疼痛患者对膝关节支撑的下肢协调反应

H. Wyatt, Carl Jewell, G. Weir, K. Boyer, J. Hamill
{"title":"女性膝关节前侧疼痛患者对膝关节支撑的下肢协调反应","authors":"H. Wyatt, Carl Jewell, G. Weir, K. Boyer, J. Hamill","doi":"10.29011/2576-9596.100039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Anterior Knee Pain (AKP) during running has been partially attributed to lower-limb kinematics. Mechanical deviances from asymptomatic cohorts at the hip, knee, shank and foot have been reported for joints and segments in isolation. Appraisal of lower-limb coordination and its variability may provide important insight into the role of proximal and distal lowerlimb joint and segment couplings during running with AKP. The extent to which current knee bracing strategies (standard-fit and custom-fit) for pain moderation influence lower-limb couplings may assist in the development of empirically informed recommendations for AKP management. The aim of this study was to investigate lower-extremity kinematic couplings of AKP participants during running without bracing and when wearing standardand custom-fit knee braces. Methods: Eighteen females (nine AKP, nine asymptomatic) performed ten running trials at a fixed speed (3.2 m·s-1) in a customfit knee brace, a standard-fit knee brace and no brace. Three-dimensional unilateral lower-limb kinematics data were obtained from which, joint and segment angles were calculated. Hip-knee, knee-ankle, thigh-shank and shank-foot coordination and coordination variability were determined using a modified vector coding technique. Results: AKP participants spent less time in knee internal rotation-dominant couplings (P < 0.05) and a greater proportion of stance in ankle eversion-dominant couplings (P = 0.01; ES = 0.62). Frontal plane hip-knee couplings were found to differ for AKP participants when wearing standardand custom-fit braces (P = 0.04; ES = 0.39). Overall, bracing conditions had the greatest influence on the asymptomatic cohort. No coordination variability differences were found between groups or conditions. Discussion: Participants with AKP ran with different lower-limb coordination strategies than their asymptomatic counterparts. Localized joint bracing (standardand custom-fit) did not oppose the coupling mechanics found in the AKP cohort when running in the unconstrained condition. It is therefore suggested that pain management strategies which consider the whole limb may be more effective than knee braces alone.","PeriodicalId":186403,"journal":{"name":"Sports Injuries & Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lower-Limb Coordination Responses to Knee Bracing in Females with Anterior Knee Pain\",\"authors\":\"H. Wyatt, Carl Jewell, G. Weir, K. Boyer, J. Hamill\",\"doi\":\"10.29011/2576-9596.100039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Anterior Knee Pain (AKP) during running has been partially attributed to lower-limb kinematics. Mechanical deviances from asymptomatic cohorts at the hip, knee, shank and foot have been reported for joints and segments in isolation. Appraisal of lower-limb coordination and its variability may provide important insight into the role of proximal and distal lowerlimb joint and segment couplings during running with AKP. The extent to which current knee bracing strategies (standard-fit and custom-fit) for pain moderation influence lower-limb couplings may assist in the development of empirically informed recommendations for AKP management. The aim of this study was to investigate lower-extremity kinematic couplings of AKP participants during running without bracing and when wearing standardand custom-fit knee braces. Methods: Eighteen females (nine AKP, nine asymptomatic) performed ten running trials at a fixed speed (3.2 m·s-1) in a customfit knee brace, a standard-fit knee brace and no brace. Three-dimensional unilateral lower-limb kinematics data were obtained from which, joint and segment angles were calculated. Hip-knee, knee-ankle, thigh-shank and shank-foot coordination and coordination variability were determined using a modified vector coding technique. Results: AKP participants spent less time in knee internal rotation-dominant couplings (P < 0.05) and a greater proportion of stance in ankle eversion-dominant couplings (P = 0.01; ES = 0.62). Frontal plane hip-knee couplings were found to differ for AKP participants when wearing standardand custom-fit braces (P = 0.04; ES = 0.39). Overall, bracing conditions had the greatest influence on the asymptomatic cohort. No coordination variability differences were found between groups or conditions. Discussion: Participants with AKP ran with different lower-limb coordination strategies than their asymptomatic counterparts. Localized joint bracing (standardand custom-fit) did not oppose the coupling mechanics found in the AKP cohort when running in the unconstrained condition. It is therefore suggested that pain management strategies which consider the whole limb may be more effective than knee braces alone.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Injuries & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Injuries & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29011/2576-9596.100039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Injuries & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29011/2576-9596.100039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:跑步时膝关节前侧疼痛(AKP)部分归因于下肢运动学。在髋关节、膝关节、小腿和足的无症状队列中,有孤立的关节和节段机械异常的报道。对下肢协调性及其变异性的评估可以为了解下肢近端和远端关节和节段耦合在AKP运动中的作用提供重要的见解。目前用于缓解疼痛的膝关节支撑策略(标准配合和定制配合)对下肢耦合的影响程度可能有助于制定AKP管理的经验建议。本研究的目的是调查AKP参与者在跑步时没有支架和佩戴标准和定制膝盖支架时的下肢运动耦合。方法:18名女性(9名AKP患者,9名无症状患者)分别佩戴定制护膝、标准护膝和不佩戴护膝,以3.2 m·s-1的固定速度进行10次跑步试验。获得三维单侧下肢运动学数据,计算关节角和节段角。采用改进的矢量编码技术确定髋-膝、膝-踝、大腿骨和胫-足的协调性和协调性变异性。结果:AKP参与者在膝关节内旋-显性耦合中花费的时间较少(P < 0.05),在踝关节外翻-显性耦合中站立的比例较大(P = 0.01);Es = 0.62)。当佩戴标准和定制牙套时,AKP参与者的正面髋关节-膝关节耦合存在差异(P = 0.04;Es = 0.39)。总体而言,支撑条件对无症状队列的影响最大。没有发现组间或条件间的协调变异性差异。讨论:与无症状的参与者相比,AKP参与者在跑步时采用了不同的下肢协调策略。局部关节支撑(标准和定制配合)在无约束条件下运行时不反对在AKP队列中发现的耦合机制。因此,建议考虑整个肢体的疼痛管理策略可能比单独的膝关节支架更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lower-Limb Coordination Responses to Knee Bracing in Females with Anterior Knee Pain
Background: Anterior Knee Pain (AKP) during running has been partially attributed to lower-limb kinematics. Mechanical deviances from asymptomatic cohorts at the hip, knee, shank and foot have been reported for joints and segments in isolation. Appraisal of lower-limb coordination and its variability may provide important insight into the role of proximal and distal lowerlimb joint and segment couplings during running with AKP. The extent to which current knee bracing strategies (standard-fit and custom-fit) for pain moderation influence lower-limb couplings may assist in the development of empirically informed recommendations for AKP management. The aim of this study was to investigate lower-extremity kinematic couplings of AKP participants during running without bracing and when wearing standardand custom-fit knee braces. Methods: Eighteen females (nine AKP, nine asymptomatic) performed ten running trials at a fixed speed (3.2 m·s-1) in a customfit knee brace, a standard-fit knee brace and no brace. Three-dimensional unilateral lower-limb kinematics data were obtained from which, joint and segment angles were calculated. Hip-knee, knee-ankle, thigh-shank and shank-foot coordination and coordination variability were determined using a modified vector coding technique. Results: AKP participants spent less time in knee internal rotation-dominant couplings (P < 0.05) and a greater proportion of stance in ankle eversion-dominant couplings (P = 0.01; ES = 0.62). Frontal plane hip-knee couplings were found to differ for AKP participants when wearing standardand custom-fit braces (P = 0.04; ES = 0.39). Overall, bracing conditions had the greatest influence on the asymptomatic cohort. No coordination variability differences were found between groups or conditions. Discussion: Participants with AKP ran with different lower-limb coordination strategies than their asymptomatic counterparts. Localized joint bracing (standardand custom-fit) did not oppose the coupling mechanics found in the AKP cohort when running in the unconstrained condition. It is therefore suggested that pain management strategies which consider the whole limb may be more effective than knee braces alone.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Stature and Its Estimation Utilizing Length of Hand Measurements of Both Gender Adolescents from Western region of Kosovo Cannabidiol (CBD) in the Management of Sports-Related Traumatic Brain Injury: Research and Efficacy Plication of The Medial Patellofemoral Ligament for The Treatment of Chronic Patella Dislocations and Refractory Patellofemoral Syndrome. A Retrospective Case Series and Review Injury Rate in Beach Handball – Comparison Between Two Tournaments of the European Beach Tour (EBT) Long-Term Effects of ACL Transection on the Gastrocnemius Muscle in Rats
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1