Dominik Marciniak
{"title":"Dwie koncepcje badań metafizycznych rozwijane w XX wieku w filozofii polskiej","authors":"Dominik Marciniak","doi":"10.14746/cis.2022.53.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents two different conceptions of metaphysics – scientistic and neoscholastic – developed in the 20th century by, among others, Polish philosophers: Stanisław Kamiński, Mieczysław Gogacz, Tadeusz Czeżowski and Zygmunt Zawirski. These authors refer to the problem of the possibility of conducting metaphysical research in contemporary philosophy. In this context, they examine issues such as the method, subject, and specificity of research carried out within metaphysics. In the summary, the discussed conceptions are compared with each other. The basic issues determining the similarities and differences between respective positions are the problem of the autonomy of metaphysics in relation to other sciences and the issue of the starting point (source of preliminary data) of metaphysical research. Findings regarding the latter issue turn out to be crucial for resolving the question of the appropriate model for research in metaphysics.","PeriodicalId":444061,"journal":{"name":"Człowiek i Społeczeństwo","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Człowiek i Społeczeństwo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/cis.2022.53.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了20世纪波兰哲学家Stanisław Kamiński、Mieczysław戈加兹、塔德乌什Czeżowski和扎维尔斯基提出的两种不同的形而上学概念——科学主义和新经院主义。这些作者提到了在当代哲学中进行形而上学研究的可能性问题。在这种情况下,他们检查的问题,如方法,主题,并在形而上学进行研究的特殊性。在总结部分,对讨论的概念进行了比较。决定各自立场相同点和不同点的基本问题是形而上学相对于其他科学的自主性问题和形而上学研究的起点(初步资料的来源)问题。关于后一个问题的发现对于解决形而上学研究的适当模式问题至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dwie koncepcje badań metafizycznych rozwijane w XX wieku w filozofii polskiej
The paper presents two different conceptions of metaphysics – scientistic and neoscholastic – developed in the 20th century by, among others, Polish philosophers: Stanisław Kamiński, Mieczysław Gogacz, Tadeusz Czeżowski and Zygmunt Zawirski. These authors refer to the problem of the possibility of conducting metaphysical research in contemporary philosophy. In this context, they examine issues such as the method, subject, and specificity of research carried out within metaphysics. In the summary, the discussed conceptions are compared with each other. The basic issues determining the similarities and differences between respective positions are the problem of the autonomy of metaphysics in relation to other sciences and the issue of the starting point (source of preliminary data) of metaphysical research. Findings regarding the latter issue turn out to be crucial for resolving the question of the appropriate model for research in metaphysics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Wprowadzenie redaktorów tomu. Inspiracja i zaproszenie do dyskusji o socjologii miasta Tożsamość społeczno-przestrzenna miasta satelitarnego. Przykład Lubonia koło Poznania Psychologiczne uwarunkowania przywiązania do miejsca: zaufanie społeczne, styl przywiązania i lęk. Badanie longitudinalne w okresie pandemii COVID-19 Uważność a radzenie sobie ze stresem u kobiet i mężczyzn Kapitał społeczny miasta globalizującego się. Studium przypadku Krakowa i Poznania
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1