利用高斯多变量异常检测模型检测非法资金流动

Olalere Isaac Opeyemi, Dewa Mendon, Dlamini Lenhle
{"title":"利用高斯多变量异常检测模型检测非法资金流动","authors":"Olalere Isaac Opeyemi, Dewa Mendon, Dlamini Lenhle","doi":"10.35609/gcbssproceeding.2022.1(49)","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper predicts a measurement indicator for the trade mispricing channel and its\neffectiveness in identifying IFFs. A model, gaussian multivariate anomaly detection algorithm,\nfor classifying between a legal and illegal transactions that are suspicious in terms of\nmisreporting was developed. The method is a machine learning technique, and uses data from\nSouth Africa, Botswana, USA, and China over a period from 2000-2019, to learn whether there\nis any intriguing differences on the model performance based on these countries and effect of\nother factors. Imports, Exports are used as features of the model while the netflow derived from\nthese features is used as the third feature of the model. Imports and exports data are sourced from\nIMF’s Direction of Trade Statistics database. Annual tariffs’ data and corruption data comes\nfrom the WDI database and the Transparency International’s Corruption Perception index,\nrespectively. Data for ‘accounting and auditing standards’ comes from the world economic\nforum. This study contributes to the debate on trade mispricing by proving a baseline\nmeasurement to help detects and track IFFs. The result showed that while the model may be\neffective in detecting IFFs due to mispricing, other factors may however contribute to\nirregularities of trading data that is flagged as IFFs. This in addition to accounting for total\nquantum, also provide details empowering governments with the information to stimulate and\ndrive the desire to curb IFFs from its different sources and channels.\nKeywords: Gaussian Multivariate Anomaly Detection; GMAD; Illicit Financial Flow; IFF.,\nTrade Mispricing; TM.","PeriodicalId":340394,"journal":{"name":"13th GLOBAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detecting Illicit Financial Flow through Gaussian Multivariate\\nAnomaly Detection Model\",\"authors\":\"Olalere Isaac Opeyemi, Dewa Mendon, Dlamini Lenhle\",\"doi\":\"10.35609/gcbssproceeding.2022.1(49)\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper predicts a measurement indicator for the trade mispricing channel and its\\neffectiveness in identifying IFFs. A model, gaussian multivariate anomaly detection algorithm,\\nfor classifying between a legal and illegal transactions that are suspicious in terms of\\nmisreporting was developed. The method is a machine learning technique, and uses data from\\nSouth Africa, Botswana, USA, and China over a period from 2000-2019, to learn whether there\\nis any intriguing differences on the model performance based on these countries and effect of\\nother factors. Imports, Exports are used as features of the model while the netflow derived from\\nthese features is used as the third feature of the model. Imports and exports data are sourced from\\nIMF’s Direction of Trade Statistics database. Annual tariffs’ data and corruption data comes\\nfrom the WDI database and the Transparency International’s Corruption Perception index,\\nrespectively. Data for ‘accounting and auditing standards’ comes from the world economic\\nforum. This study contributes to the debate on trade mispricing by proving a baseline\\nmeasurement to help detects and track IFFs. The result showed that while the model may be\\neffective in detecting IFFs due to mispricing, other factors may however contribute to\\nirregularities of trading data that is flagged as IFFs. This in addition to accounting for total\\nquantum, also provide details empowering governments with the information to stimulate and\\ndrive the desire to curb IFFs from its different sources and channels.\\nKeywords: Gaussian Multivariate Anomaly Detection; GMAD; Illicit Financial Flow; IFF.,\\nTrade Mispricing; TM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"13th GLOBAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"13th GLOBAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35609/gcbssproceeding.2022.1(49)\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"13th GLOBAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35609/gcbssproceeding.2022.1(49)","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文预测了贸易错误定价渠道的度量指标及其识别ifs的有效性。开发了一个模型,高斯多元异常检测算法,用于在可疑的误报方面对合法和非法交易进行分类。该方法是一种机器学习技术,并使用来自南非、博茨瓦纳、美国和中国2000年至2019年期间的数据,以了解基于这些国家和其他因素的影响,模型性能是否存在有趣的差异。导入、导出用作模型的特征,而从这些特征派生的netflow用作模型的第三个特征。进出口数据来源于国际货币基金组织的贸易统计方向数据库。年度关税数据和腐败数据分别来自WDI数据库和透明国际的清廉指数。“会计和审计准则”的数据来自世界经济论坛。本研究通过证明一种基线测量方法来帮助检测和跟踪iff,为贸易错误定价的辩论做出了贡献。结果表明,虽然该模型可能有效地检测由于定价错误导致的iff,但其他因素可能导致被标记为iff的交易数据的违规行为。除了计算总量子外,这也为政府提供了信息细节,使其能够从不同的来源和渠道刺激和推动遏制iff的愿望。关键词:高斯多元异常检测;GMAD;非法资金流动;敌我识别。、贸易错误定价;TM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Detecting Illicit Financial Flow through Gaussian Multivariate Anomaly Detection Model
This paper predicts a measurement indicator for the trade mispricing channel and its effectiveness in identifying IFFs. A model, gaussian multivariate anomaly detection algorithm, for classifying between a legal and illegal transactions that are suspicious in terms of misreporting was developed. The method is a machine learning technique, and uses data from South Africa, Botswana, USA, and China over a period from 2000-2019, to learn whether there is any intriguing differences on the model performance based on these countries and effect of other factors. Imports, Exports are used as features of the model while the netflow derived from these features is used as the third feature of the model. Imports and exports data are sourced from IMF’s Direction of Trade Statistics database. Annual tariffs’ data and corruption data comes from the WDI database and the Transparency International’s Corruption Perception index, respectively. Data for ‘accounting and auditing standards’ comes from the world economic forum. This study contributes to the debate on trade mispricing by proving a baseline measurement to help detects and track IFFs. The result showed that while the model may be effective in detecting IFFs due to mispricing, other factors may however contribute to irregularities of trading data that is flagged as IFFs. This in addition to accounting for total quantum, also provide details empowering governments with the information to stimulate and drive the desire to curb IFFs from its different sources and channels. Keywords: Gaussian Multivariate Anomaly Detection; GMAD; Illicit Financial Flow; IFF., Trade Mispricing; TM.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Elements of organizational justice as determinants of job satisfaction and internship rotation in the era of Happiness Management Implementation of Integrated Reporting Within Regional Investment Information Systems and Achievement of Sustainable Development Goals (Evidence from Regional Government) The Emergency Remote Teaching during the COVID-19 Pandemic from the Perspective of Higher Education Students in Portugal The Role of Collaborative Learning on Learning Engagement: An Empirical Facts from Nigeria Methodology for Measuring the Benefits of Participation in Business Clusters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1