Kevin Arifianto, Ali Imron
{"title":"Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Probing-Promting Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Peserta Didik Pada Mata Pelajaran Fiqih Kelas XI di MAN 1 Wonosobo","authors":"Kevin Arifianto, Ali Imron","doi":"10.34001/jasna.v2i1.3242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to 1) find out the application of the probing-promting learning model in fiqh subjects in class XI at MAN 1 Wonosobo; 2) Knowing the increase in student achievement after using the probing-promting learning model in fiqh subjects for class XI at MAN 1 Wonosobo; 3) Knowing the difference in learning achievement using the probing-promting learning model with those using the conventional learning model.The approach uses a quasi-experimental method, using a nonequivalent control class pretest posttest design. The subjects in this study were taken into two classes, namely the experimental class and the control class. Before the second lesson, the class was given a pretest question. Experimental class students were given learning using the example of probing-promting learning, while the control class used conventional learning models. The experimental class and the control class were subjected to a final test in the form of a written test. then the results are processed, analyzed, and distributed using the t-test and gain test to find out the difference between the two classes studied and the increase in learning achievement.The impact of the research conveys that in PAI learning, students who use the example of probing-promting learning in this study have increased. This is shown using the gain test for the experimental class, which will be 0.618. and there are differences in the fiqh learning of students who are taught to use the probing-promting learning model using students who are not taught to use the probing-promting learning model. This is evidenced by using the t-test tcount > ttable both at the 1% significance level, which is 3.21 > 2.676. Meanwhile, at the 5% significance level, the t table is 2,008.","PeriodicalId":415821,"journal":{"name":"JASNA : Journal For Aswaja Studies","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JASNA : Journal For Aswaja Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34001/jasna.v2i1.3242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

3)了解探究促进学习模式与传统学习模式在学习成绩上的差异。该方法采用准实验方法,采用非等效控制类前测后测设计。本研究的受试者被分为两个班,即实验班和对照组。在第二节课前,全班同学被布置了一道预考题。实验班学生采用探究促进式学习模式进行学习,对照组学生采用传统学习模式进行学习。实验班和对照组以笔试的形式进行期末考试。然后使用t检验和增益检验对结果进行处理、分析和分布,以找出所研究的两个班级之间的差异和学习成绩的增加。本研究的影响表明,在PAI学习中,使用本研究探究促进学习范例的学生有所增加。这是用实验类的增益测试显示的,它将是0.618。被教导使用探究促进学习模式的学生和未被教导使用探究促进学习模式的学生在fiqh学习上存在差异。在1%显著性水平下使用t检验tcount >表可以证明这一点,即3.21 > 2.676。同时,在5%显著性水平下,t表为2008。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Probing-Promting Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Peserta Didik Pada Mata Pelajaran Fiqih Kelas XI di MAN 1 Wonosobo
This study aims to 1) find out the application of the probing-promting learning model in fiqh subjects in class XI at MAN 1 Wonosobo; 2) Knowing the increase in student achievement after using the probing-promting learning model in fiqh subjects for class XI at MAN 1 Wonosobo; 3) Knowing the difference in learning achievement using the probing-promting learning model with those using the conventional learning model.The approach uses a quasi-experimental method, using a nonequivalent control class pretest posttest design. The subjects in this study were taken into two classes, namely the experimental class and the control class. Before the second lesson, the class was given a pretest question. Experimental class students were given learning using the example of probing-promting learning, while the control class used conventional learning models. The experimental class and the control class were subjected to a final test in the form of a written test. then the results are processed, analyzed, and distributed using the t-test and gain test to find out the difference between the two classes studied and the increase in learning achievement.The impact of the research conveys that in PAI learning, students who use the example of probing-promting learning in this study have increased. This is shown using the gain test for the experimental class, which will be 0.618. and there are differences in the fiqh learning of students who are taught to use the probing-promting learning model using students who are not taught to use the probing-promting learning model. This is evidenced by using the t-test tcount > ttable both at the 1% significance level, which is 3.21 > 2.676. Meanwhile, at the 5% significance level, the t table is 2,008.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Urgence Of Islamic Philosophy For Education In Elementary School Tradisi Teng-Tengan, Ketuwinan dan Weh-Wehan di Kaliwungu Kendal Jawa Tengah (Kajian Living Hadis Pendekatan Antropologi Interpretatif Simbolik) Jalan Menjadi Waliyullah dalam Kitab Hadis Arbain Nawawi Hadis Ke-38 Pemikiran Teologi Maturidiyyah (Pendekatan Sejarah) Etika Bermedia Sosial Dalam Perseperktif NU
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1