Özge ŞEHİRLİ KINCI, Mehmet Ferdi Kıncı, Leyla Taştan, Ercan Saruhan, A. A. Sivaslıoğlu
{"title":"Son Dört Yılda Üçüncü Basamak Hastanemizde Doğumu Gerçekleşen Çoğul Gebelik Sonuçlarının Değerlendirilmesi","authors":"Özge ŞEHİRLİ KINCI, Mehmet Ferdi Kıncı, Leyla Taştan, Ercan Saruhan, A. A. Sivaslıoğlu","doi":"10.38136/jgon.1094804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of multiple pregnancies between January 2016 and December 2020 in our hospital, which is a tertiary center. \nMaterials and Methods: 107 multiple pregnancies were included in the study among 6567 pregnant women who were delivered between January 2016 and December 2020 in Muğla University Training and Research Hospital Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic. Of these retrospectively evaluated pregnant women, 106 were twins and 1 was triplet. \nResults: It was determined that 87 (80.18%) twin pregnancies were diamniotic-dichorionic, 11 (10.37%) were dichorionic-monoamniotic, and 8 (7.54%) were monochorionic-monoamniotic, respectively. 76 (71.69%) of the deliveries were with preterm delivery and 30 (28.3%) of the pregnant women were delivered at term. Twelve (11.1%) twin pregnancies were delivered by vaginal delivery, and 96 (88.9%) by cesarean section (C/S). No statistical difference was observed in terms of blood loss when the C/S and vaginal delivery groups were compared. When compared in terms of hospitalization time, it was found that the hospitalization period was shorter in the vaginal delivery group. \nConclusion: The clinical results of our study are similar to the current literature. In our study, what we evaluated differently from the literature is blood loss and hospitalization time between C/S and vaginal delivery. There was no difference between C/S and vaginal delivery in terms of blood loss, and it was observed that the hospitalization period of patients who had vaginal delivery was shorter.","PeriodicalId":119624,"journal":{"name":"Jinekoloji-Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tıp Dergisi","volume":"121 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jinekoloji-Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tıp Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38136/jgon.1094804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估我院2016年1月至2020年12月期间多胎妊娠的结局。材料与方法:选取2016年1月至2020年12月在Muğla大学培训与研究医院妇产科门诊分娩的6567名孕妇,共纳入107例多胎妊娠。在这些回顾性评估的孕妇中,106名是双胞胎,1名是三胞胎。结果:双绒毛膜双胎共87例(80.18%),双绒毛膜-单羊膜双胎共11例(10.37%),单绒毛膜-单羊膜双胎共8例(7.54%)。早产76例(71.69%),足月分娩30例(28.3%)。双胎妊娠经阴道分娩12例(11.1%),剖宫产96例(88.9%)。当C/S组和阴道分娩组比较时,出血量没有统计学差异。对比住院时间,发现阴道分娩组住院时间更短。结论:本研究的临床结果与现有文献相似。在我们的研究中,我们与文献评估不同的是C/S和阴道分娩之间的出血量和住院时间。C/S与阴道分娩在出血量方面没有差异,并且观察到阴道分娩患者住院时间更短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Son Dört Yılda Üçüncü Basamak Hastanemizde Doğumu Gerçekleşen Çoğul Gebelik Sonuçlarının Değerlendirilmesi
Aim: We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of multiple pregnancies between January 2016 and December 2020 in our hospital, which is a tertiary center. Materials and Methods: 107 multiple pregnancies were included in the study among 6567 pregnant women who were delivered between January 2016 and December 2020 in Muğla University Training and Research Hospital Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic. Of these retrospectively evaluated pregnant women, 106 were twins and 1 was triplet. Results: It was determined that 87 (80.18%) twin pregnancies were diamniotic-dichorionic, 11 (10.37%) were dichorionic-monoamniotic, and 8 (7.54%) were monochorionic-monoamniotic, respectively. 76 (71.69%) of the deliveries were with preterm delivery and 30 (28.3%) of the pregnant women were delivered at term. Twelve (11.1%) twin pregnancies were delivered by vaginal delivery, and 96 (88.9%) by cesarean section (C/S). No statistical difference was observed in terms of blood loss when the C/S and vaginal delivery groups were compared. When compared in terms of hospitalization time, it was found that the hospitalization period was shorter in the vaginal delivery group. Conclusion: The clinical results of our study are similar to the current literature. In our study, what we evaluated differently from the literature is blood loss and hospitalization time between C/S and vaginal delivery. There was no difference between C/S and vaginal delivery in terms of blood loss, and it was observed that the hospitalization period of patients who had vaginal delivery was shorter.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fetal Abdomen Çapı Ölçümü ile Omuz Distosisi Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi-Retrospektif Vaka Kontrol Çalışması TÜRKİYE SEZARYEN ORANI DURUM ANALİZİ VE POLİTİKA ÖNERİLERİ Assessment of the Fibrinogen-to-Albumin Ratio in Predicting the Severity of Hyperemesis Gravidarum Huge Adnexal Masses Managed by Single Port Laparoscopy: A case series Evaluation of Inflammation Markers and Pregnancy Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Intrauterin Insemination (IUI) for Unexplained Infertility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1