关系自我调节、伴侣调节与关系结果之间的关联:一项元分析

IF 3.2 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Journal of Family Theory & Review Pub Date : 2023-05-10 DOI:10.1111/jftr.12508
Elizabeth K. Ferguson, Gery C. Karantzas, Emma M. Marshall, Laura Knox
{"title":"关系自我调节、伴侣调节与关系结果之间的关联:一项元分析","authors":"Elizabeth K. Ferguson,&nbsp;Gery C. Karantzas,&nbsp;Emma M. Marshall,&nbsp;Laura Knox","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine whether relationship self-regulation (changing aspects of the self for the sake of the relationship) or partner regulation (changing the partner for the sake of the self/relationship) was more strongly associated with romantic relationship quality. Twenty studies (5 on relationship self-regulation, 15 on partner regulation; <i>N</i> = 15,563) were included. A moderate positive association was found between relationship self-regulation and relationship quality (<i>r</i> = .42). A weak positive association was found between positive partner regulation and relationship quality (<i>r</i> = .14). A negative association was found between negative partner regulation strategies and relationship quality (<i>r</i> = −.22). Partner regulation strategies were unlikely to be successful in prompting change in targeted partners. A weak positive association was found between positive strategies and regulation success (<i>r</i> = .10), and a weak negative association was found between negative strategies and regulation success (<i>r</i> = −.09). Thus, relationship self-regulation is more strongly associated with relationship quality than partner regulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"15 4","pages":"764-792"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The associations between relationship self-regulation, partner regulation, and relationship outcomes: A meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth K. Ferguson,&nbsp;Gery C. Karantzas,&nbsp;Emma M. Marshall,&nbsp;Laura Knox\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jftr.12508\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine whether relationship self-regulation (changing aspects of the self for the sake of the relationship) or partner regulation (changing the partner for the sake of the self/relationship) was more strongly associated with romantic relationship quality. Twenty studies (5 on relationship self-regulation, 15 on partner regulation; <i>N</i> = 15,563) were included. A moderate positive association was found between relationship self-regulation and relationship quality (<i>r</i> = .42). A weak positive association was found between positive partner regulation and relationship quality (<i>r</i> = .14). A negative association was found between negative partner regulation strategies and relationship quality (<i>r</i> = −.22). Partner regulation strategies were unlikely to be successful in prompting change in targeted partners. A weak positive association was found between positive strategies and regulation success (<i>r</i> = .10), and a weak negative association was found between negative strategies and regulation success (<i>r</i> = −.09). Thus, relationship self-regulation is more strongly associated with relationship quality than partner regulation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Family Theory & Review\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"764-792\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Family Theory & Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jftr.12508\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jftr.12508","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项荟萃分析的目的是确定关系自我调节(为了关系而改变自我的某些方面)还是伴侣调节(为了自我/关系而改变伴侣)与浪漫关系质量的关系更强。20项研究(关系自我调节5项,伴侣调节15项;N = 15,563)。关系自我调节与关系质量呈中等正相关(r = 0.42)。积极的伴侣调节与关系质量之间存在弱正相关(r = .14)。负性伴侣调节策略与关系质量呈负相关(r = - 0.22)。合作伙伴监管战略不太可能成功地促使目标合作伙伴发生变化。积极策略与监管成功之间存在弱正相关(r = 0.10),而消极策略与监管成功之间存在弱负相关(r = - 0.09)。因此,关系自我调节比伴侣调节对关系质量的影响更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The associations between relationship self-regulation, partner regulation, and relationship outcomes: A meta-analysis

The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine whether relationship self-regulation (changing aspects of the self for the sake of the relationship) or partner regulation (changing the partner for the sake of the self/relationship) was more strongly associated with romantic relationship quality. Twenty studies (5 on relationship self-regulation, 15 on partner regulation; N = 15,563) were included. A moderate positive association was found between relationship self-regulation and relationship quality (r = .42). A weak positive association was found between positive partner regulation and relationship quality (r = .14). A negative association was found between negative partner regulation strategies and relationship quality (r = −.22). Partner regulation strategies were unlikely to be successful in prompting change in targeted partners. A weak positive association was found between positive strategies and regulation success (r = .10), and a weak negative association was found between negative strategies and regulation success (r = −.09). Thus, relationship self-regulation is more strongly associated with relationship quality than partner regulation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
Addressing campus–community relationships using the three corners marriage model Türkiye's responses to the 2023 earthquakes: An application of family adjustment and adaptation response model Family science, land‐grant universities, and the daunting legacy of the land‐grab institution JFTR wants you! The power of humility in theory development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1