使用顺序等价检查的重定时验证

B. Kahne, M. Abadir
{"title":"使用顺序等价检查的重定时验证","authors":"B. Kahne, M. Abadir","doi":"10.1109/MTV.2005.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"High performance designs must conform to stringent timing requirements. Designers frequently utilize low-level optimization techniques and develop many iterations of the same block in order to close a timing gap. Simulation with random stimulus is the traditional method for verifying that these changes do not introduce a change in the functional behavior of the block. For the development of a new high-performance core at Freescale Semiconductor the authors decided to instead research the possibility of using formal techniques, in the form of sequential equivalence checking, for this form of verification. Various equivalence checking tools were evaluated for this task. Initial results looked promising and the authors decided to integrate this capability into our design flow. This paper describes the experience and also addresses some of the problems that were exposed and how we plan to deal with them","PeriodicalId":179953,"journal":{"name":"2005 Sixth International Workshop on Microprocessor Test and Verification","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retiming Verification Using Sequential Equivalence Checking\",\"authors\":\"B. Kahne, M. Abadir\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MTV.2005.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"High performance designs must conform to stringent timing requirements. Designers frequently utilize low-level optimization techniques and develop many iterations of the same block in order to close a timing gap. Simulation with random stimulus is the traditional method for verifying that these changes do not introduce a change in the functional behavior of the block. For the development of a new high-performance core at Freescale Semiconductor the authors decided to instead research the possibility of using formal techniques, in the form of sequential equivalence checking, for this form of verification. Various equivalence checking tools were evaluated for this task. Initial results looked promising and the authors decided to integrate this capability into our design flow. This paper describes the experience and also addresses some of the problems that were exposed and how we plan to deal with them\",\"PeriodicalId\":179953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2005 Sixth International Workshop on Microprocessor Test and Verification\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2005 Sixth International Workshop on Microprocessor Test and Verification\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MTV.2005.22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2005 Sixth International Workshop on Microprocessor Test and Verification","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MTV.2005.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

高性能设计必须符合严格的时序要求。设计人员经常使用低级优化技术,并对同一块进行多次迭代,以缩小时间差距。模拟随机刺激是验证这些变化不会引起块的功能行为变化的传统方法。为了在飞思卡尔半导体开发一种新的高性能核心,作者决定转而研究使用正式技术的可能性,以顺序等效检查的形式,进行这种形式的验证。为此任务评估了各种等效性检查工具。最初的结果看起来很有希望,作者决定将此功能集成到我们的设计流程中。本文描述了这些经验,并提出了一些暴露的问题以及我们如何处理这些问题的计划
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Retiming Verification Using Sequential Equivalence Checking
High performance designs must conform to stringent timing requirements. Designers frequently utilize low-level optimization techniques and develop many iterations of the same block in order to close a timing gap. Simulation with random stimulus is the traditional method for verifying that these changes do not introduce a change in the functional behavior of the block. For the development of a new high-performance core at Freescale Semiconductor the authors decided to instead research the possibility of using formal techniques, in the form of sequential equivalence checking, for this form of verification. Various equivalence checking tools were evaluated for this task. Initial results looked promising and the authors decided to integrate this capability into our design flow. This paper describes the experience and also addresses some of the problems that were exposed and how we plan to deal with them
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is IDDQ Test of Microprocessors Feasible? HW/SW Co-Verification of a RISC CPU using Bounded Model Checking Language-driven Validation of Pipelined Processors using Satisfiability Solvers Automatic Generation of High Performance Embedded Memory Models for PowerPC Microprocessors Retiming Verification Using Sequential Equivalence Checking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1