尼日利亚某三级卫生机构三组卫生专业人员的精神病发病率比较。

A. D. Yussuf
{"title":"尼日利亚某三级卫生机构三组卫生专业人员的精神病发病率比较。","authors":"A. D. Yussuf","doi":"10.4314/NJPSYC.V5I1.39898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Because health professionals have different job schedules and commitments,\nthey may be differentially susceptible to developing psychological health problems under\nsimilar work environment.\nAims The present study compared the levels of morbidity in 3 groups of health\nprofessionals (Consultants, Residents, and Nurses) identified as having probable\npsychiatric morbidity (i.e., score of 4 and above on 30-item GHQ), to ascertain the most\nsusceptible to psychiatric morbidity among these 3 groups of health professionals, and the\npossible risk factors for such susceptibility.\nMethod This was a cross-sectional survey involving 563 health professionals\n(Consultants, Residents, and Nurses) in the employ of University of Ilorin Teaching\nHospital (UITH). Subjects were asked to respond to 2 questionnaires (sociodemographic/\nwork-related, and the 30-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-30)).\nData of respondents with probable psychiatric morbidity (i.e., score of 4 or more on the\nGHQ) were analysed using SPSS for Windows version 11, to generate frequency\ndistributions and cross tabulation. Chi square figures, odd ratios, and relative risk were\ncalculated; The level of statistical significance was set at 5%.\nResults The overall response rate was 71.8% (404/563): by groups it was 69.2% (54/78)\nfor consultants, 70% (70/100) for residents, and 72.7% (280/385) for nurses. The mean\nscores on the 30-item GHQ were 1.76 (SD=2.8), 2.76 (SD=3.8), and 1.58 (SD=2.1) for\nconsultants, residents, and the nurses respectively. The residents significantly scored\nhigher than the consultants or nurses on the\n30-item GHQ (F =5.99, p=0.003).\nTen (18.5%), 18 (25.7%), and 50 (17.9%) with mean scores of 6.7 (SD=1.6), 7.7\n(SD=4.7), and 5.2 (SD=2.1) of consultants, residents, and nurses respectively, scored 4 or\nmore on the 30-item GHQ, and were considered as having probable psychiatric morbidity\n(F=5.7, p=0.005).\nApart from other risk factors such as relationships with patients' relatives, job experience,\nand unsatisfactory remunerations, the negative effect of work on the residents' family\nmade them about 18 times more susceptible to developing psychiatric morbidity than\nconsultants or nurses while female gender made the nurses about 16 times more\nsusceptible than any of the other 2 professionals.\nConclusion The author therefore advocates establishment of a comprehensive stress\nmanagement program in the health institutions, mentoring program to provide\nprofessional and emotional support to residents and other hospital staff, and collaboration\nwith the Behavioural Sciences (Psychiatric) department, as well as adequate\nstaffing/equipping of this department. Nigerian Journal of Psychiatry Vol. 5 (1) 2007: pp. 31-37","PeriodicalId":422969,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative psychiatric morbidity among three groups of health professionals in a Nigerian tertiary health institution.\",\"authors\":\"A. D. Yussuf\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/NJPSYC.V5I1.39898\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Because health professionals have different job schedules and commitments,\\nthey may be differentially susceptible to developing psychological health problems under\\nsimilar work environment.\\nAims The present study compared the levels of morbidity in 3 groups of health\\nprofessionals (Consultants, Residents, and Nurses) identified as having probable\\npsychiatric morbidity (i.e., score of 4 and above on 30-item GHQ), to ascertain the most\\nsusceptible to psychiatric morbidity among these 3 groups of health professionals, and the\\npossible risk factors for such susceptibility.\\nMethod This was a cross-sectional survey involving 563 health professionals\\n(Consultants, Residents, and Nurses) in the employ of University of Ilorin Teaching\\nHospital (UITH). Subjects were asked to respond to 2 questionnaires (sociodemographic/\\nwork-related, and the 30-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-30)).\\nData of respondents with probable psychiatric morbidity (i.e., score of 4 or more on the\\nGHQ) were analysed using SPSS for Windows version 11, to generate frequency\\ndistributions and cross tabulation. Chi square figures, odd ratios, and relative risk were\\ncalculated; The level of statistical significance was set at 5%.\\nResults The overall response rate was 71.8% (404/563): by groups it was 69.2% (54/78)\\nfor consultants, 70% (70/100) for residents, and 72.7% (280/385) for nurses. The mean\\nscores on the 30-item GHQ were 1.76 (SD=2.8), 2.76 (SD=3.8), and 1.58 (SD=2.1) for\\nconsultants, residents, and the nurses respectively. The residents significantly scored\\nhigher than the consultants or nurses on the\\n30-item GHQ (F =5.99, p=0.003).\\nTen (18.5%), 18 (25.7%), and 50 (17.9%) with mean scores of 6.7 (SD=1.6), 7.7\\n(SD=4.7), and 5.2 (SD=2.1) of consultants, residents, and nurses respectively, scored 4 or\\nmore on the 30-item GHQ, and were considered as having probable psychiatric morbidity\\n(F=5.7, p=0.005).\\nApart from other risk factors such as relationships with patients' relatives, job experience,\\nand unsatisfactory remunerations, the negative effect of work on the residents' family\\nmade them about 18 times more susceptible to developing psychiatric morbidity than\\nconsultants or nurses while female gender made the nurses about 16 times more\\nsusceptible than any of the other 2 professionals.\\nConclusion The author therefore advocates establishment of a comprehensive stress\\nmanagement program in the health institutions, mentoring program to provide\\nprofessional and emotional support to residents and other hospital staff, and collaboration\\nwith the Behavioural Sciences (Psychiatric) department, as well as adequate\\nstaffing/equipping of this department. Nigerian Journal of Psychiatry Vol. 5 (1) 2007: pp. 31-37\",\"PeriodicalId\":422969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nigerian Journal of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nigerian Journal of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/NJPSYC.V5I1.39898\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/NJPSYC.V5I1.39898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:由于卫生专业人员有不同的工作时间表和承诺,他们可能在相似的工作环境中不同地容易产生心理健康问题。目的本研究比较三组被确定为可能有精神疾病的卫生专业人员(咨询员、住院医师和护士)(即在30项GHQ中得分为4分及以上)的发病率水平,以确定这三组卫生专业人员中最容易发生精神疾病的人,以及这种易感性的可能危险因素。方法采用横断面调查方法,对伊洛林大学教学医院563名卫生专业人员(会诊医师、住院医师和护士)进行调查。受试者被要求回答2份问卷(社会人口学/工作相关问卷和30项一般健康问卷(GHQ-30))。使用SPSS for Windows version 11对可能有精神疾病(即ghq得分在4分或以上)的受访者数据进行分析,生成频率分布和交叉表。重新计算卡方数据、奇比和相对风险;统计学显著性水平设为5%。结果总有效率为71.8%(404/563),分组中,会诊医生的总有效率为69.2%(54/78),住院医生的总有效率为70%(70/100),护士的总有效率为72.7%(280/385)。咨询医师、住院医师和护士的GHQ均值分别为1.76 (SD=2.8)、2.76 (SD=3.8)和1.58 (SD=2.1)。住院医师在30项GHQ上的得分显著高于咨询医师或护士(F =5.99, p=0.003)。平均得分6.7 (SD=1.6)、7.7(SD=4.7)和5.2 (SD=2.1)的咨询师、住院医师和护士分别有10人(18.5%)、18人(25.7%)和50人(17.9%)在30项GHQ中得分在4分及以上,被认为可能存在精神疾病(F=5.7, p=0.005)。除去与病人亲属的关系、工作经验和不满意的报酬等其他风险因素外,工作对住院医生家庭的负面影响使他们比咨询师或护士更容易发生精神疾病,而女性使护士比其他两种专业人员更容易发生精神疾病,其易感性约为18倍。因此,作者主张在卫生机构建立一个全面的压力管理计划,指导计划,为居民和其他医院工作人员提供专业和情感支持,并与行为科学(精神科)部门合作,以及该部门的适当人员/设备。尼日利亚精神病学杂志Vol. 5 (1) 2007: pp. 31-37
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative psychiatric morbidity among three groups of health professionals in a Nigerian tertiary health institution.
Background Because health professionals have different job schedules and commitments, they may be differentially susceptible to developing psychological health problems under similar work environment. Aims The present study compared the levels of morbidity in 3 groups of health professionals (Consultants, Residents, and Nurses) identified as having probable psychiatric morbidity (i.e., score of 4 and above on 30-item GHQ), to ascertain the most susceptible to psychiatric morbidity among these 3 groups of health professionals, and the possible risk factors for such susceptibility. Method This was a cross-sectional survey involving 563 health professionals (Consultants, Residents, and Nurses) in the employ of University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital (UITH). Subjects were asked to respond to 2 questionnaires (sociodemographic/ work-related, and the 30-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-30)). Data of respondents with probable psychiatric morbidity (i.e., score of 4 or more on the GHQ) were analysed using SPSS for Windows version 11, to generate frequency distributions and cross tabulation. Chi square figures, odd ratios, and relative risk were calculated; The level of statistical significance was set at 5%. Results The overall response rate was 71.8% (404/563): by groups it was 69.2% (54/78) for consultants, 70% (70/100) for residents, and 72.7% (280/385) for nurses. The mean scores on the 30-item GHQ were 1.76 (SD=2.8), 2.76 (SD=3.8), and 1.58 (SD=2.1) for consultants, residents, and the nurses respectively. The residents significantly scored higher than the consultants or nurses on the 30-item GHQ (F =5.99, p=0.003). Ten (18.5%), 18 (25.7%), and 50 (17.9%) with mean scores of 6.7 (SD=1.6), 7.7 (SD=4.7), and 5.2 (SD=2.1) of consultants, residents, and nurses respectively, scored 4 or more on the 30-item GHQ, and were considered as having probable psychiatric morbidity (F=5.7, p=0.005). Apart from other risk factors such as relationships with patients' relatives, job experience, and unsatisfactory remunerations, the negative effect of work on the residents' family made them about 18 times more susceptible to developing psychiatric morbidity than consultants or nurses while female gender made the nurses about 16 times more susceptible than any of the other 2 professionals. Conclusion The author therefore advocates establishment of a comprehensive stress management program in the health institutions, mentoring program to provide professional and emotional support to residents and other hospital staff, and collaboration with the Behavioural Sciences (Psychiatric) department, as well as adequate staffing/equipping of this department. Nigerian Journal of Psychiatry Vol. 5 (1) 2007: pp. 31-37
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The importance of 'Group Social Support' in treatment and re-union of a declared missing paranoid schizophrenic patient with her family: A Case Report An Appraisal of the Mental Health Curriculum for Undergraduates in Nigerian Medical Schools Prevalence and Factors Responsible for Stigmatization of the Mentally Ill among Student Nurses in North-Eastern Nigeria Anxio-depressive Symptoms in Patients with Cardiac Failure in Jos University Teaching Hospital (JUTH) Attitudes of Medical Students to Psychiatry in a Nigerian University
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1