基于R的单标签学习分类方法的基准评价

P. K. A. Chitra, S. Appavu
{"title":"基于R的单标签学习分类方法的基准评价","authors":"P. K. A. Chitra, S. Appavu","doi":"10.1109/ICE-CCN.2013.6528603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Classification in data mining is a procedure in which individual items are placed into groups based on quantitative information on one or more characteristics items and based on a training set of previously labeled items. The objective of this paper is to introduce, explain and compare the performance of the single - labeled supervised learning algorithms in R language on benchmark single labeled data set. The traditional classification algorithms like Decision Tree, Naïve Bayes, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, Classification and Regression Trees are used under inspection. The R language is chosen to see the classification performances. Four measures (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, F - measure) of performance here considered are based on confusion matrix, table of counts revealing the performance of algorithm's confusion regarding the true classifications. The observation of all the four performance measures lead to infer that the Decision Tree outperforms than other classification methods.","PeriodicalId":286830,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE International Conference ON Emerging Trends in Computing, Communication and Nanotechnology (ICECCN)","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benchmark evaluation of classification methods for single label learning with R\",\"authors\":\"P. K. A. Chitra, S. Appavu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICE-CCN.2013.6528603\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Classification in data mining is a procedure in which individual items are placed into groups based on quantitative information on one or more characteristics items and based on a training set of previously labeled items. The objective of this paper is to introduce, explain and compare the performance of the single - labeled supervised learning algorithms in R language on benchmark single labeled data set. The traditional classification algorithms like Decision Tree, Naïve Bayes, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, Classification and Regression Trees are used under inspection. The R language is chosen to see the classification performances. Four measures (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, F - measure) of performance here considered are based on confusion matrix, table of counts revealing the performance of algorithm's confusion regarding the true classifications. The observation of all the four performance measures lead to infer that the Decision Tree outperforms than other classification methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":286830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 IEEE International Conference ON Emerging Trends in Computing, Communication and Nanotechnology (ICECCN)\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 IEEE International Conference ON Emerging Trends in Computing, Communication and Nanotechnology (ICECCN)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE-CCN.2013.6528603\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE International Conference ON Emerging Trends in Computing, Communication and Nanotechnology (ICECCN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE-CCN.2013.6528603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

数据挖掘中的分类是基于一个或多个特征项目的定量信息和先前标记的项目的训练集将单个项目分组的过程。本文的目的是介绍、解释和比较R语言的单标签监督学习算法在基准单标签数据集上的性能。传统的分类算法,如决策树,Naïve贝叶斯,支持向量机,随机森林,分类和回归树的检查。选择R语言来查看分类性能。这里考虑的性能的四个度量(灵敏度、特异性、准确性、F度量)是基于混淆矩阵的,该矩阵是显示算法对真实分类的混淆性能的计数表。对所有四种性能度量的观察导致推断决策树优于其他分类方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Benchmark evaluation of classification methods for single label learning with R
Classification in data mining is a procedure in which individual items are placed into groups based on quantitative information on one or more characteristics items and based on a training set of previously labeled items. The objective of this paper is to introduce, explain and compare the performance of the single - labeled supervised learning algorithms in R language on benchmark single labeled data set. The traditional classification algorithms like Decision Tree, Naïve Bayes, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, Classification and Regression Trees are used under inspection. The R language is chosen to see the classification performances. Four measures (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, F - measure) of performance here considered are based on confusion matrix, table of counts revealing the performance of algorithm's confusion regarding the true classifications. The observation of all the four performance measures lead to infer that the Decision Tree outperforms than other classification methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Removing snow from an image via image decomposition Maximum a posteriori adaptation method for video semantic indexing Low power 8×8 Sum of Absolute Difference engine for Motion Estimation in video compression A modified preamble structure based carrier frequency offset (CFO) and phase noise compensation in an OFDM system Multiple learning based classifiers using layered approach and Feature Selection for attack detection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1