宪政理论在政权循环中的作用

J. Balkin
{"title":"宪政理论在政权循环中的作用","authors":"J. Balkin","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197530993.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Constitutional theories such as originalism and living constitutionalism evolve to reflect the changing attitudes of partisans and legal intellectuals in political time. They also develop to reflect changing views about judicial review and judicial restraint. For example, while conservative originalism began as a justification for judicial restraint, it soon evolved to justify strong judicial review; the same thing happened to living constitutionalism earlier in the twentieth century. Because we are near the end of the Reagan regime, Democrats are invested in judicial restraint and Republicans in judicial engagement. The situation is closest to the one faced by Democrats in the 1930s. Democrats’ relative hostility to the courts will continue until Democrats once again gain control through partisan entrenchment. However, because the Trump administration has worked hard to stock the courts with as many young conservative jurists as possible, this change may take some time.","PeriodicalId":193339,"journal":{"name":"The Cycles of Constitutional Time","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Constitutional Theory in the Cycle of Regimes\",\"authors\":\"J. Balkin\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780197530993.003.0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Constitutional theories such as originalism and living constitutionalism evolve to reflect the changing attitudes of partisans and legal intellectuals in political time. They also develop to reflect changing views about judicial review and judicial restraint. For example, while conservative originalism began as a justification for judicial restraint, it soon evolved to justify strong judicial review; the same thing happened to living constitutionalism earlier in the twentieth century. Because we are near the end of the Reagan regime, Democrats are invested in judicial restraint and Republicans in judicial engagement. The situation is closest to the one faced by Democrats in the 1930s. Democrats’ relative hostility to the courts will continue until Democrats once again gain control through partisan entrenchment. However, because the Trump administration has worked hard to stock the courts with as many young conservative jurists as possible, this change may take some time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":193339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Cycles of Constitutional Time\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Cycles of Constitutional Time\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197530993.003.0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cycles of Constitutional Time","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197530993.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

原旨主义和生活立宪主义等宪法理论的演变反映了政治时代党派和法律知识分子态度的变化。它们的发展也反映了人们对司法审查和司法约束看法的变化。例如,虽然保守的原旨主义最初是作为司法限制的理由,但它很快演变为强有力的司法审查的理由;在20世纪早期,同样的事情也发生在现存的宪政主义身上。由于我们已接近里根政权的尾声,民主党人致力于司法克制,共和党人致力于司法参与。这种情况最接近民主党在上世纪30年代所面临的情况。民主党人对法院的相对敌意将持续下去,直到民主党通过党派壕沟再次获得控制权。然而,由于特朗普政府努力让尽可能多的年轻保守派法学家进入法院,这一变化可能需要一段时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Role of Constitutional Theory in the Cycle of Regimes
Constitutional theories such as originalism and living constitutionalism evolve to reflect the changing attitudes of partisans and legal intellectuals in political time. They also develop to reflect changing views about judicial review and judicial restraint. For example, while conservative originalism began as a justification for judicial restraint, it soon evolved to justify strong judicial review; the same thing happened to living constitutionalism earlier in the twentieth century. Because we are near the end of the Reagan regime, Democrats are invested in judicial restraint and Republicans in judicial engagement. The situation is closest to the one faced by Democrats in the 1930s. Democrats’ relative hostility to the courts will continue until Democrats once again gain control through partisan entrenchment. However, because the Trump administration has worked hard to stock the courts with as many young conservative jurists as possible, this change may take some time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How Cycles of Polarization and Depolarization Shape the Exercise of Judicial Review Judicial Review in the Cycles of Constitutional Time How the Rise and Fall of Regimes Affects Judicial Review Judicial Politics and Judicial Reform The Cycle of Constitutional Rot and Renewal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1