创意工作者:教育和经验的回报。来自澳大利亚的证据

K. Zawadzki, Monika Wojdyło
{"title":"创意工作者:教育和经验的回报。来自澳大利亚的证据","authors":"K. Zawadzki, Monika Wojdyło","doi":"10.25167/EES.2018.46.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper uses unit record data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey conducted on 7340 individuals. The mapping methodology of Australian creative economy was implemented to extract 455 workers belonging to 27 creative occupations. To compare differentiation of influence of human capital on the creative workers’ hourly wage with the general population’s returns to education and work experience, the quantile and ordinary least squares regressions were used. Results indicate larger wage gap among creative workers than among other working persons. Returns to education and to experience are similar for the creative workforce, while in the general population return to education is three times as large as to experience. The most important finding is that investing in school education is less profitable for creative economy workers than that for other working people. Besides, there is a considerable difference in the profitability of investment in human capital among creative men and women.","PeriodicalId":408153,"journal":{"name":"Economic and Environmental Studies","volume":"249 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creative workers: returns to education and experience. The evidence from Australia\",\"authors\":\"K. Zawadzki, Monika Wojdyło\",\"doi\":\"10.25167/EES.2018.46.33\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper uses unit record data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey conducted on 7340 individuals. The mapping methodology of Australian creative economy was implemented to extract 455 workers belonging to 27 creative occupations. To compare differentiation of influence of human capital on the creative workers’ hourly wage with the general population’s returns to education and work experience, the quantile and ordinary least squares regressions were used. Results indicate larger wage gap among creative workers than among other working persons. Returns to education and to experience are similar for the creative workforce, while in the general population return to education is three times as large as to experience. The most important finding is that investing in school education is less profitable for creative economy workers than that for other working people. Besides, there is a considerable difference in the profitability of investment in human capital among creative men and women.\",\"PeriodicalId\":408153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic and Environmental Studies\",\"volume\":\"249 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic and Environmental Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25167/EES.2018.46.33\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic and Environmental Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25167/EES.2018.46.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文使用来自澳大利亚家庭、收入和劳动力动态(HILDA)调查的单位记录数据,该调查对7340个人进行了调查。采用澳大利亚创意经济的绘图方法,抽取了27个创意职业的455名工人。为了比较人力资本对创意工作者小时工资的影响与一般人群的教育和工作经验回报的差异,我们使用了分位数回归和普通最小二乘回归。结果表明,创意工作者之间的工资差距比其他工作人员更大。对于创造性劳动力来说,教育回报和体验回报是相似的,而在一般人群中,教育回报是体验回报的三倍。最重要的发现是,对创意经济工作者来说,投资学校教育的利润低于其他劳动者。此外,有创造力的男性和女性在人力资本投资的盈利能力方面存在相当大的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Creative workers: returns to education and experience. The evidence from Australia
This paper uses unit record data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey conducted on 7340 individuals. The mapping methodology of Australian creative economy was implemented to extract 455 workers belonging to 27 creative occupations. To compare differentiation of influence of human capital on the creative workers’ hourly wage with the general population’s returns to education and work experience, the quantile and ordinary least squares regressions were used. Results indicate larger wage gap among creative workers than among other working persons. Returns to education and to experience are similar for the creative workforce, while in the general population return to education is three times as large as to experience. The most important finding is that investing in school education is less profitable for creative economy workers than that for other working people. Besides, there is a considerable difference in the profitability of investment in human capital among creative men and women.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Public attitude to food waste: the case of Lithuania Involvement of cities with county rights in financing tasks pertaining to physical culture ROLE OF THE PATENT SYSTEM IN THE INTERNATIONALI-ZATION OF THE DIFFUSION OF TECHNICAL KNOWLEDGE Cost structure of production as a determinant of the deflator of household consumption. The Input - Output approach. Changes in consumption behaviours of Polish seniors - singles in 2007 and 2016
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1