创伤性脑损伤后需要ICU住院或手术干预的患者的格拉斯哥昏迷评分与创伤性脑损伤的Marshall计算机断层扫描(CT)分类的关系

Sumit Joshi, P. Paudel, D. B. Shah, Prasanna Karki, G. Sharma
{"title":"创伤性脑损伤后需要ICU住院或手术干预的患者的格拉斯哥昏迷评分与创伤性脑损伤的Marshall计算机断层扫描(CT)分类的关系","authors":"Sumit Joshi, P. Paudel, D. B. Shah, Prasanna Karki, G. Sharma","doi":"10.3126/nmmj.v3i1.48520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND Glasgow coma scale (GCS) and Marshall computed tomography classification of traumatic brain injury can predict the severity of the brain injury in patients following trauma. This study aims to analyse the association between two, in patients who required ICU admission or neurosurgical intervention following trauma. \nMETHODOLOGY Retrospective study of 64 patients who underwent ICU admission or neurosurgical intervention following traumatic brain injury from September 2017 to December 2020 in Nepal Mediciti Hospital. Majority of the mild head injury where CT scan was not performed, discharged from the emergency or did not need ICU admission or admitted in ward for observation, severe polytrauma were excluded from the study. Glasgow coma Scale was categorized into mild (13-15), moderate (9-12) and severe (<8). The Marshall CT scan Grade was dichotomized into (1-3) and (4-6). \nRESULTS Out 64 patients, majority were male 48 (84.4%), mean age 42.33 (SD±16.16). In admitted patients, 48.4 %( GCS< 8), 39.1% (GCS 9-12), 12.5% (GCS 13-15).The higher marshal grade (4-6) was present in 93.54 %( <8), 48% (9-12), 25% (13-15). There was significant association of the GCS with the Marshall CT scan grade (p=0.00). \nCONCLUSION There is significant association between the presenting GCS and Marshall CT Scan grade following TBI. The more severe patients with decreasing GCS have higher Marshall CT Scan grade in CT scan of the brain.  ","PeriodicalId":131440,"journal":{"name":"Nepal Mediciti Medical Journal","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of the Presenting Glasgow Coma Scale in patients who requires ICU admission or operative intervention following traumatic brain injury with the Marshall computed tomography (CT) classification of traumatic brain injury\",\"authors\":\"Sumit Joshi, P. Paudel, D. B. Shah, Prasanna Karki, G. Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.3126/nmmj.v3i1.48520\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND Glasgow coma scale (GCS) and Marshall computed tomography classification of traumatic brain injury can predict the severity of the brain injury in patients following trauma. This study aims to analyse the association between two, in patients who required ICU admission or neurosurgical intervention following trauma. \\nMETHODOLOGY Retrospective study of 64 patients who underwent ICU admission or neurosurgical intervention following traumatic brain injury from September 2017 to December 2020 in Nepal Mediciti Hospital. Majority of the mild head injury where CT scan was not performed, discharged from the emergency or did not need ICU admission or admitted in ward for observation, severe polytrauma were excluded from the study. Glasgow coma Scale was categorized into mild (13-15), moderate (9-12) and severe (<8). The Marshall CT scan Grade was dichotomized into (1-3) and (4-6). \\nRESULTS Out 64 patients, majority were male 48 (84.4%), mean age 42.33 (SD±16.16). In admitted patients, 48.4 %( GCS< 8), 39.1% (GCS 9-12), 12.5% (GCS 13-15).The higher marshal grade (4-6) was present in 93.54 %( <8), 48% (9-12), 25% (13-15). There was significant association of the GCS with the Marshall CT scan grade (p=0.00). \\nCONCLUSION There is significant association between the presenting GCS and Marshall CT Scan grade following TBI. The more severe patients with decreasing GCS have higher Marshall CT Scan grade in CT scan of the brain.  \",\"PeriodicalId\":131440,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nepal Mediciti Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nepal Mediciti Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3126/nmmj.v3i1.48520\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nepal Mediciti Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/nmmj.v3i1.48520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:创伤性脑损伤的格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)和马歇尔计算机断层扫描分级可以预测创伤后患者脑损伤的严重程度。本研究旨在分析创伤后需要ICU住院或神经外科干预的患者两者之间的关系。方法回顾性分析2017年9月至2020年12月尼泊尔美第奇蒂医院收治的64例颅脑外伤患者。大多数未进行CT扫描的轻度颅脑损伤,急诊出院或不需要ICU住院或住院观察,严重多发伤均被排除在研究之外。格拉斯哥昏迷评分分为轻度(13-15)、中度(9-12)和重度(<8)。马歇尔CT扫描分级分为(1-3)和(4-6)。结果64例患者中,男性48例(84.4%),平均年龄42.33岁(SD±16.16)。入院患者中,GCS< 8者占48.4%,GCS 9-12者占39.1%,GCS 13-15者占12.5%。较高元帅等级(4 ~ 6)的占93.54%(<8),48%(9 ~ 12),25%(13 ~ 15)。GCS与Marshall CT扫描分级有显著相关性(p=0.00)。结论颅脑损伤后GCS表现与Marshall CT分级有显著相关性。GCS下降越严重的患者,其脑部CT扫描的Marshall CT分级越高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association of the Presenting Glasgow Coma Scale in patients who requires ICU admission or operative intervention following traumatic brain injury with the Marshall computed tomography (CT) classification of traumatic brain injury
BACKGROUND Glasgow coma scale (GCS) and Marshall computed tomography classification of traumatic brain injury can predict the severity of the brain injury in patients following trauma. This study aims to analyse the association between two, in patients who required ICU admission or neurosurgical intervention following trauma. METHODOLOGY Retrospective study of 64 patients who underwent ICU admission or neurosurgical intervention following traumatic brain injury from September 2017 to December 2020 in Nepal Mediciti Hospital. Majority of the mild head injury where CT scan was not performed, discharged from the emergency or did not need ICU admission or admitted in ward for observation, severe polytrauma were excluded from the study. Glasgow coma Scale was categorized into mild (13-15), moderate (9-12) and severe (<8). The Marshall CT scan Grade was dichotomized into (1-3) and (4-6). RESULTS Out 64 patients, majority were male 48 (84.4%), mean age 42.33 (SD±16.16). In admitted patients, 48.4 %( GCS< 8), 39.1% (GCS 9-12), 12.5% (GCS 13-15).The higher marshal grade (4-6) was present in 93.54 %( <8), 48% (9-12), 25% (13-15). There was significant association of the GCS with the Marshall CT scan grade (p=0.00). CONCLUSION There is significant association between the presenting GCS and Marshall CT Scan grade following TBI. The more severe patients with decreasing GCS have higher Marshall CT Scan grade in CT scan of the brain.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Annulling an Annulled Annular Pancreas: A Case Report Surgical Treatment of Cerebral cavernous Malformations: Report of 6 Cases and pertinent Literature review A retrospective study on bacteriological profile and antibiotics prescription practice in a tertiary level intensive care unit Study of Percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy outcomes in valves with different Echocardiographic features Silver Diamine Fluoride: A Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1