双头180度和三头360度SPECT扫描对心脏均匀性、对比度和信噪比的评价

M. Chen, R. Jaszczak, J. Bowsher, D. Gilland
{"title":"双头180度和三头360度SPECT扫描对心脏均匀性、对比度和信噪比的评价","authors":"M. Chen, R. Jaszczak, J. Bowsher, D. Gilland","doi":"10.1109/NSSMIC.2000.949234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An experimental phantom study was performed to evaluate cardiac uniformity, contrast and SNR for two clinical cardiac SPECT imaging protocols: adjacent dual-head 180/spl deg/ and triple-head 360/spl deg/ scans. One head of a SPECT camera was used to acquire 180/spl deg/ and 360/spl deg/ projections with different times per step to simulate the clinical case where dual-head 180/spl deg/ and triple-head 360/spl deg/ each takes a total of 20 minutes. Scans were acquired with no lesion, anterior lesion and posterior lesion in the myocardium. Maximum a posteriori (MAP) reconstruction was done by Iterative Coordinate Descent (ICD) algorithm using a quadratic convex prior. The L-curve method was used to obtain the prior strength. Images both with attenuation and scatter correction (ASC) and without ASC were compared. The 180/spl deg/ scan shows an intensity decrease in anterior apical and posterior basal regions. The 360/spl deg/ scan shows an intensity decrease in the posterior wall. For the anterior lesion the 180/spl deg/ scan has slightly better contrast while for the posterior lesion the 360/spl deg/ scan has slightly better contrast. In conclusion, the difference between the 180/spl deg/ and 360/spl deg/ scans is subtle and the comparison results depend on the lesion position and the view angle of the heart. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) study of 180/spl deg/ vs. 360/spl deg/ acquisition designed based on these characterizations of contrast, uniformity and noise will be necessary to evaluate overall performance.","PeriodicalId":445100,"journal":{"name":"2000 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (Cat. No.00CH37149)","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An evaluation of cardiac uniformity, contrast and SNR with dual-head 180 degree and triple-head 360 degree SPECT scans\",\"authors\":\"M. Chen, R. Jaszczak, J. Bowsher, D. Gilland\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NSSMIC.2000.949234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An experimental phantom study was performed to evaluate cardiac uniformity, contrast and SNR for two clinical cardiac SPECT imaging protocols: adjacent dual-head 180/spl deg/ and triple-head 360/spl deg/ scans. One head of a SPECT camera was used to acquire 180/spl deg/ and 360/spl deg/ projections with different times per step to simulate the clinical case where dual-head 180/spl deg/ and triple-head 360/spl deg/ each takes a total of 20 minutes. Scans were acquired with no lesion, anterior lesion and posterior lesion in the myocardium. Maximum a posteriori (MAP) reconstruction was done by Iterative Coordinate Descent (ICD) algorithm using a quadratic convex prior. The L-curve method was used to obtain the prior strength. Images both with attenuation and scatter correction (ASC) and without ASC were compared. The 180/spl deg/ scan shows an intensity decrease in anterior apical and posterior basal regions. The 360/spl deg/ scan shows an intensity decrease in the posterior wall. For the anterior lesion the 180/spl deg/ scan has slightly better contrast while for the posterior lesion the 360/spl deg/ scan has slightly better contrast. In conclusion, the difference between the 180/spl deg/ and 360/spl deg/ scans is subtle and the comparison results depend on the lesion position and the view angle of the heart. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) study of 180/spl deg/ vs. 360/spl deg/ acquisition designed based on these characterizations of contrast, uniformity and noise will be necessary to evaluate overall performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":445100,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2000 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (Cat. No.00CH37149)\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2000 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (Cat. No.00CH37149)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.2000.949234\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2000 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (Cat. No.00CH37149)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.2000.949234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

我们进行了一项实验性幻象研究,以评估两种临床心脏SPECT成像方案的心脏均匀性、对比度和信噪比:相邻双头180/spl度扫描和三头360/spl度扫描。采用单头SPECT摄像机以不同的时间获取180/spl度和360/spl度的投影,模拟双头180/spl度和三头360/spl度的临床情况,每步需要20分钟。扫描结果为心肌无病变、前病变、后病变。采用二次凸先验迭代坐标下降(ICD)算法进行最大后验(MAP)重建。采用l曲线法获得了先验强度。对比了衰减散射校正(ASC)和不进行衰减散射校正(ASC)的图像。180/spl度/扫描显示前根尖区和后基底区强度降低。360度/spl度/扫描显示后壁强度降低。对于前部病变,180/spl度/扫描的对比度略好,而对于后部病变,360/spl度/扫描的对比度略好。综上所述,180/spl度和360/spl度扫描的差异很小,其比较结果取决于病变位置和心脏视角。基于对比度、均匀性和噪声这些特征设计的180/spl度/与360/spl度/采集的接收机工作特性(ROC)研究将是评估整体性能的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An evaluation of cardiac uniformity, contrast and SNR with dual-head 180 degree and triple-head 360 degree SPECT scans
An experimental phantom study was performed to evaluate cardiac uniformity, contrast and SNR for two clinical cardiac SPECT imaging protocols: adjacent dual-head 180/spl deg/ and triple-head 360/spl deg/ scans. One head of a SPECT camera was used to acquire 180/spl deg/ and 360/spl deg/ projections with different times per step to simulate the clinical case where dual-head 180/spl deg/ and triple-head 360/spl deg/ each takes a total of 20 minutes. Scans were acquired with no lesion, anterior lesion and posterior lesion in the myocardium. Maximum a posteriori (MAP) reconstruction was done by Iterative Coordinate Descent (ICD) algorithm using a quadratic convex prior. The L-curve method was used to obtain the prior strength. Images both with attenuation and scatter correction (ASC) and without ASC were compared. The 180/spl deg/ scan shows an intensity decrease in anterior apical and posterior basal regions. The 360/spl deg/ scan shows an intensity decrease in the posterior wall. For the anterior lesion the 180/spl deg/ scan has slightly better contrast while for the posterior lesion the 360/spl deg/ scan has slightly better contrast. In conclusion, the difference between the 180/spl deg/ and 360/spl deg/ scans is subtle and the comparison results depend on the lesion position and the view angle of the heart. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) study of 180/spl deg/ vs. 360/spl deg/ acquisition designed based on these characterizations of contrast, uniformity and noise will be necessary to evaluate overall performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of a low-cost extruded scintillator with co-extruded reflector for the MINOS experiment The GREAT triggerless total data readout method Spatially dependent response of thick and large area PIN diode developed for ASTRO-E hard X-ray detector Implementation and evaluation of a 3D OSEM and median root prior (3D OSEM-MRP) reconstruction algorithm Comparison of the SSRB, MSRB, and FORE methods with the 3DRP algorithm using data from a high resolution PET scanner
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1