在早期政策和市场背景下,女性和男性对电动汽车表现出相似的兴趣

K. Kurani, K. Buch
{"title":"在早期政策和市场背景下,女性和男性对电动汽车表现出相似的兴趣","authors":"K. Kurani, K. Buch","doi":"10.7922/G28S4N77","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Author(s): Kurani, Kenneth; Buch, Koral | Abstract: While ownership and purchase of all vehicles approach gender parity, to date electric vehicles (EV) are being purchased by far more men than women. Prior analysis from California finds no reason in the available data why this difference persists. This report extends that analysis across 12 other U.S. states with varying, but generally less supportive than California, EV policy and market contexts. Data are from a survey conducted of new-car buying households at the end of 2014, which allowed participants to express their prospective interest in acquiring an EV. Participants then indicated why they were motivated to select an EV or what motivated them to not select one. Via multivariate modeling, differences in prospective interest in EVs between female and male respondents are examined, and overall, no difference rises to the level of the observed differences in real EV markets. Further, the multivariate modeling indicates no statistically significant effect of a sex indicator on prospective interest almost anywhere in these data; where there is a difference, female participants are estimated to be more likely to select an EV than their male counterparts. While participants from both sexes tend to give high scores to the same EV (de)motivations, differences in their rank orders repeat generalizations from other research. On average, female respondents score environmental motivations for selecting an EV higher than do male respondents. On average, male participants score interest in “new technology” as a motivation for selecting an EV higher than do female participants. Conversely, on average female respondents who do not select an EV score “unfamiliar technology” more highly than their male counterparts. Within the variation in EV policy and market contexts represented in this study, no finding here explains why similar prospective interest in EVs from five years ago has yet to be turned toward equal participation in EV markets. Explanations may lie in factors not modeled here.View the NCST Project Webpage","PeriodicalId":422295,"journal":{"name":"Research Papers in Economics","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Across Early Policy and Market Contexts Women and Men Show Similar Interest in Electric Vehicles\",\"authors\":\"K. Kurani, K. Buch\",\"doi\":\"10.7922/G28S4N77\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Author(s): Kurani, Kenneth; Buch, Koral | Abstract: While ownership and purchase of all vehicles approach gender parity, to date electric vehicles (EV) are being purchased by far more men than women. Prior analysis from California finds no reason in the available data why this difference persists. This report extends that analysis across 12 other U.S. states with varying, but generally less supportive than California, EV policy and market contexts. Data are from a survey conducted of new-car buying households at the end of 2014, which allowed participants to express their prospective interest in acquiring an EV. Participants then indicated why they were motivated to select an EV or what motivated them to not select one. Via multivariate modeling, differences in prospective interest in EVs between female and male respondents are examined, and overall, no difference rises to the level of the observed differences in real EV markets. Further, the multivariate modeling indicates no statistically significant effect of a sex indicator on prospective interest almost anywhere in these data; where there is a difference, female participants are estimated to be more likely to select an EV than their male counterparts. While participants from both sexes tend to give high scores to the same EV (de)motivations, differences in their rank orders repeat generalizations from other research. On average, female respondents score environmental motivations for selecting an EV higher than do male respondents. On average, male participants score interest in “new technology” as a motivation for selecting an EV higher than do female participants. Conversely, on average female respondents who do not select an EV score “unfamiliar technology” more highly than their male counterparts. Within the variation in EV policy and market contexts represented in this study, no finding here explains why similar prospective interest in EVs from five years ago has yet to be turned toward equal participation in EV markets. Explanations may lie in factors not modeled here.View the NCST Project Webpage\",\"PeriodicalId\":422295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Papers in Economics\",\"volume\":\"97 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Papers in Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7922/G28S4N77\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Papers in Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7922/G28S4N77","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作者:Kurani, Kenneth;摘要:尽管所有汽车的拥有量和购买量接近性别平等,但迄今为止,购买电动汽车的男性远远多于女性。加州先前的分析在现有数据中没有发现这种差异持续存在的原因。这份报告将这一分析扩展到美国其他12个州,这些州的电动汽车政策和市场环境各不相同,但总体上没有加州那么支持电动汽车。数据来自2014年底对购买新车的家庭进行的一项调查,该调查允许参与者表达他们对购买电动汽车的潜在兴趣。然后,参与者指出他们为什么有动力选择电动汽车,或者是什么促使他们不选择电动汽车。通过多变量建模,研究了女性和男性受访者对电动汽车的预期兴趣的差异,总体而言,没有差异上升到实际电动汽车市场中观察到的差异的水平。此外,多元模型表明,性别指标对这些数据中几乎任何地方的潜在兴趣都没有统计学上的显著影响;在存在差异的地方,据估计女性参与者比男性参与者更有可能选择电动汽车。尽管男女参与者都倾向于给相同的EV (de)动机打高分,但他们等级顺序的差异重复了其他研究的结论。平均而言,女性受访者对选择电动汽车的环境动机的评分高于男性受访者。平均而言,男性参与者对“新技术”的兴趣作为选择电动汽车的动机得分高于女性参与者。相反,平均而言,没有选择EV的女性受访者对“不熟悉的技术”的评分高于男性受访者。在本研究所反映的电动汽车政策和市场背景的变化中,没有发现可以解释为什么五年前对电动汽车的类似预期兴趣尚未转向平等参与电动汽车市场。解释可能在于这里没有建模的因素。查看NCST项目网页
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Across Early Policy and Market Contexts Women and Men Show Similar Interest in Electric Vehicles
Author(s): Kurani, Kenneth; Buch, Koral | Abstract: While ownership and purchase of all vehicles approach gender parity, to date electric vehicles (EV) are being purchased by far more men than women. Prior analysis from California finds no reason in the available data why this difference persists. This report extends that analysis across 12 other U.S. states with varying, but generally less supportive than California, EV policy and market contexts. Data are from a survey conducted of new-car buying households at the end of 2014, which allowed participants to express their prospective interest in acquiring an EV. Participants then indicated why they were motivated to select an EV or what motivated them to not select one. Via multivariate modeling, differences in prospective interest in EVs between female and male respondents are examined, and overall, no difference rises to the level of the observed differences in real EV markets. Further, the multivariate modeling indicates no statistically significant effect of a sex indicator on prospective interest almost anywhere in these data; where there is a difference, female participants are estimated to be more likely to select an EV than their male counterparts. While participants from both sexes tend to give high scores to the same EV (de)motivations, differences in their rank orders repeat generalizations from other research. On average, female respondents score environmental motivations for selecting an EV higher than do male respondents. On average, male participants score interest in “new technology” as a motivation for selecting an EV higher than do female participants. Conversely, on average female respondents who do not select an EV score “unfamiliar technology” more highly than their male counterparts. Within the variation in EV policy and market contexts represented in this study, no finding here explains why similar prospective interest in EVs from five years ago has yet to be turned toward equal participation in EV markets. Explanations may lie in factors not modeled here.View the NCST Project Webpage
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Behavioral Economics of John Maynard Keynes Who Shall Live? Patience and Comparative Development Overconfidence and the political and financial behavior of a representative sample Trade Shocks, Labor Markets and Elections in the First Globalization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1