英国殖民政策“分而治之”:煽动阿拉伯在巴勒斯坦的对抗

A. T. Fildiş, Ensar Nişancı
{"title":"英国殖民政策“分而治之”:煽动阿拉伯在巴勒斯坦的对抗","authors":"A. T. Fildiş, Ensar Nişancı","doi":"10.11113/UMRAN2019.6N1.234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2nd November 2017 is the centenary of the Balfour Declaration which is Britain’s public acknowledgement and support of the Zionist movement and the commitment to a Jewish National Home. The Declaration is identified by the Palestinian narrative as the source of their tragedy whilst the British side its motive was the consideration of who would be most useful to the British interest under the given circumstances. The main characteristics of the Palestinian politics and society after the Balfour Declaration and during the Mandate period was the pervasiveness of factionalism. These divisions were based on family, kinship, and clan. As for their politics, they were mainly shaped by the notable families who helped to intensify this fragmentation in the Palestinian society. The notable families pervaded local politics during the Ottoman period and continued to do so in the early part of the British administration. The mandate administration, although denied the effective Palestinian self-government, it toughened the notability stratification by giving it recognition and legitimacy in social and religious affairs. The British administration refused to accept or recognize the Palestinian Arabs as a national entity, because of the lack of a central authority, Palestinians did not have the social resources to organize and unite themselves. Although the British did not recognize the Palestinians as a national entity they accepted its notables as the leaders and representatives of the Palestinians. The British policy of alliance with the notables helped those notable families achieve decisive pre-eminence in the Palestinian politics. The notability was at the forefront of the nationalist sentiment. They suppressed the existence of independent nationalist parties and groups. The same traditional elite helped intensify fragmentation in the society, especially as the external challenges became more severe. They became an impediment to the wider national integration. Following the historical background of the area until the establishment of the Mandate, this paper will focus on the analysis of the British policies feeding the inter-Arab rivalries and animosity between the notable families and conclude with the study of the valuation of the Palestinian Arab leadership until 1936-1939 Arab revolt.","PeriodicalId":121146,"journal":{"name":"UMRAN - International Journal of Islamic and Civilizational Studies","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"British Colonial Policy “Divide and Rule”: Fanning Arab Rivalry in Palestine\",\"authors\":\"A. T. Fildiş, Ensar Nişancı\",\"doi\":\"10.11113/UMRAN2019.6N1.234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The 2nd November 2017 is the centenary of the Balfour Declaration which is Britain’s public acknowledgement and support of the Zionist movement and the commitment to a Jewish National Home. The Declaration is identified by the Palestinian narrative as the source of their tragedy whilst the British side its motive was the consideration of who would be most useful to the British interest under the given circumstances. The main characteristics of the Palestinian politics and society after the Balfour Declaration and during the Mandate period was the pervasiveness of factionalism. These divisions were based on family, kinship, and clan. As for their politics, they were mainly shaped by the notable families who helped to intensify this fragmentation in the Palestinian society. The notable families pervaded local politics during the Ottoman period and continued to do so in the early part of the British administration. The mandate administration, although denied the effective Palestinian self-government, it toughened the notability stratification by giving it recognition and legitimacy in social and religious affairs. The British administration refused to accept or recognize the Palestinian Arabs as a national entity, because of the lack of a central authority, Palestinians did not have the social resources to organize and unite themselves. Although the British did not recognize the Palestinians as a national entity they accepted its notables as the leaders and representatives of the Palestinians. The British policy of alliance with the notables helped those notable families achieve decisive pre-eminence in the Palestinian politics. The notability was at the forefront of the nationalist sentiment. They suppressed the existence of independent nationalist parties and groups. The same traditional elite helped intensify fragmentation in the society, especially as the external challenges became more severe. They became an impediment to the wider national integration. Following the historical background of the area until the establishment of the Mandate, this paper will focus on the analysis of the British policies feeding the inter-Arab rivalries and animosity between the notable families and conclude with the study of the valuation of the Palestinian Arab leadership until 1936-1939 Arab revolt.\",\"PeriodicalId\":121146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"UMRAN - International Journal of Islamic and Civilizational Studies\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"UMRAN - International Journal of Islamic and Civilizational Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11113/UMRAN2019.6N1.234\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UMRAN - International Journal of Islamic and Civilizational Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11113/UMRAN2019.6N1.234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2017年11月2日是《贝尔福宣言》发表一百周年纪念日。《贝尔福宣言》是英国对犹太复国主义运动的公开承认和支持,也是对犹太民族家园的承诺。巴勒斯坦人的叙述认为《宣言》是他们悲剧的根源,而英国方面的动机是考虑在特定情况下谁对英国的利益最有帮助。《贝尔福宣言》之后和托管期间巴勒斯坦政治和社会的主要特点是派系主义的普遍存在。这些划分是基于家庭、亲属关系和氏族。至于他们的政治,他们主要是由那些帮助加剧巴勒斯坦社会分裂的著名家族所塑造的。在奥斯曼帝国时期,这些著名的家族渗透在当地的政治中,并在英国统治的早期继续这样做。授权管理虽然剥夺了巴勒斯坦人的有效自治,但它通过在社会和宗教事务中给予承认和合法性,加强了知名度分层。英国政府拒绝接受或承认巴勒斯坦阿拉伯人作为一个国家实体,因为缺乏一个中央权力机构,巴勒斯坦人没有社会资源来组织和团结自己。虽然英国人不承认巴勒斯坦人是一个国家实体,但他们接受了巴勒斯坦名人作为巴勒斯坦人的领导人和代表。英国与权贵结盟的政策帮助这些权贵家族在巴勒斯坦政治中取得了决定性的优势地位。这位名人站在了民族主义情绪的最前沿。他们压制独立的民族主义政党和团体的存在。同样的传统精英加剧了社会的分裂,尤其是在外部挑战变得更加严峻的情况下。他们成为更广泛的民族一体化的障碍。根据该地区的历史背景,直到委任统治建立,本文将重点分析英国的政策,这些政策助长了阿拉伯内部的对抗和著名家族之间的敌意,并以对巴勒斯坦阿拉伯领导层的评估研究结束,直到1936-1939年阿拉伯起义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
British Colonial Policy “Divide and Rule”: Fanning Arab Rivalry in Palestine
The 2nd November 2017 is the centenary of the Balfour Declaration which is Britain’s public acknowledgement and support of the Zionist movement and the commitment to a Jewish National Home. The Declaration is identified by the Palestinian narrative as the source of their tragedy whilst the British side its motive was the consideration of who would be most useful to the British interest under the given circumstances. The main characteristics of the Palestinian politics and society after the Balfour Declaration and during the Mandate period was the pervasiveness of factionalism. These divisions were based on family, kinship, and clan. As for their politics, they were mainly shaped by the notable families who helped to intensify this fragmentation in the Palestinian society. The notable families pervaded local politics during the Ottoman period and continued to do so in the early part of the British administration. The mandate administration, although denied the effective Palestinian self-government, it toughened the notability stratification by giving it recognition and legitimacy in social and religious affairs. The British administration refused to accept or recognize the Palestinian Arabs as a national entity, because of the lack of a central authority, Palestinians did not have the social resources to organize and unite themselves. Although the British did not recognize the Palestinians as a national entity they accepted its notables as the leaders and representatives of the Palestinians. The British policy of alliance with the notables helped those notable families achieve decisive pre-eminence in the Palestinian politics. The notability was at the forefront of the nationalist sentiment. They suppressed the existence of independent nationalist parties and groups. The same traditional elite helped intensify fragmentation in the society, especially as the external challenges became more severe. They became an impediment to the wider national integration. Following the historical background of the area until the establishment of the Mandate, this paper will focus on the analysis of the British policies feeding the inter-Arab rivalries and animosity between the notable families and conclude with the study of the valuation of the Palestinian Arab leadership until 1936-1939 Arab revolt.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pentakrifan Kemiskinan Haid Menurut Perspektif Islam/ Defining Period Poverty According To The Islamic Perspective The Relationship between Age and Level of Income with Understanding of Islamic Digital Banking Reducing Discordant Religious Relationships: Ahmadiyya Case in Indonesia Persepsi Belia Muslim Malaysia Terhadap Terorisme/ Perception of Muslim Youth in Malaysia towards Terrorism Kaedah Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah (PBD) dan Kesannya Kepada Murid Tahap Satu: Analisis Subjek Pendidikan Islam/ Classroom Assessment Method (PBD) And Its Impact On Level One Pupils: Analysis Of Islamic Education Subjects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1