打击欧盟环境市场中的滥用行为:综合运营保障措施的案例

T. Kaime
{"title":"打击欧盟环境市场中的滥用行为:综合运营保障措施的案例","authors":"T. Kaime","doi":"10.1111/REEL.12195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Various European Union (EU) regulatory bodies have championed the use of environmental markets as a key policy tool to achieve environmental protection either in lieu of, or in addition to, more traditional regulatory programmes. When these markets work properly, they have the capacity to provide enhanced levels of environmental quality and can operate as more efficient mechanisms for protecting natural resources that provide vital services to people. However, if regulatory safeguards are absent from the legal frameworks creating such markets, it is unlikely that the theoretical benefits of these arrangements will be realized. This article assesses whether a number of EU environmental markets meet design standards that guard against these risks. It concludes that despite recognition of the danger of market manipulation and outright fraud, to date regulators in the EU have largely responded to these risks in an ad hoc and incomplete fashion, rather than embedding the mechanisms for operational accountability into the regulatory frameworks that govern green trading arrangements. Finally, this article identifies and prescribes five essential pillars for market-based programmes for the environment that are necessary to provide operational safeguards. These include informational safeguards, transparency standards, rule of law safeguards, verifiable performance standards and financial fidelity rules.","PeriodicalId":340197,"journal":{"name":"Comparative & Global Administrative Law eJournal","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Countering Abuse in EU Environmental Markets: The Case for Integrated Operational Safeguards\",\"authors\":\"T. Kaime\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/REEL.12195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Various European Union (EU) regulatory bodies have championed the use of environmental markets as a key policy tool to achieve environmental protection either in lieu of, or in addition to, more traditional regulatory programmes. When these markets work properly, they have the capacity to provide enhanced levels of environmental quality and can operate as more efficient mechanisms for protecting natural resources that provide vital services to people. However, if regulatory safeguards are absent from the legal frameworks creating such markets, it is unlikely that the theoretical benefits of these arrangements will be realized. This article assesses whether a number of EU environmental markets meet design standards that guard against these risks. It concludes that despite recognition of the danger of market manipulation and outright fraud, to date regulators in the EU have largely responded to these risks in an ad hoc and incomplete fashion, rather than embedding the mechanisms for operational accountability into the regulatory frameworks that govern green trading arrangements. Finally, this article identifies and prescribes five essential pillars for market-based programmes for the environment that are necessary to provide operational safeguards. These include informational safeguards, transparency standards, rule of law safeguards, verifiable performance standards and financial fidelity rules.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative & Global Administrative Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative & Global Administrative Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/REEL.12195\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative & Global Administrative Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/REEL.12195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

欧洲联盟(EU)各监管机构都支持使用环境市场作为实现环境保护的关键政策工具,以取代或补充更传统的监管计划。当这些市场正常运作时,它们有能力提供更高水平的环境质量,并可以作为更有效的机制来保护为人民提供重要服务的自然资源。然而,如果在创建此类市场的法律框架中缺乏监管保障,这些安排的理论上的好处就不太可能实现。本文评估了一些欧盟环境市场是否符合防范这些风险的设计标准。报告的结论是,尽管认识到市场操纵和彻底欺诈的危险,但迄今为止,欧盟的监管机构在很大程度上以一种临时和不完整的方式应对这些风险,而不是将操作问责机制嵌入管理绿色交易安排的监管框架中。最后,本文确定并规定了以市场为基础的环境方案的五个基本支柱,这是提供业务保障所必需的。这些措施包括信息保障、透明度标准、法治保障、可核查的业绩标准和财务保真规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Countering Abuse in EU Environmental Markets: The Case for Integrated Operational Safeguards
Various European Union (EU) regulatory bodies have championed the use of environmental markets as a key policy tool to achieve environmental protection either in lieu of, or in addition to, more traditional regulatory programmes. When these markets work properly, they have the capacity to provide enhanced levels of environmental quality and can operate as more efficient mechanisms for protecting natural resources that provide vital services to people. However, if regulatory safeguards are absent from the legal frameworks creating such markets, it is unlikely that the theoretical benefits of these arrangements will be realized. This article assesses whether a number of EU environmental markets meet design standards that guard against these risks. It concludes that despite recognition of the danger of market manipulation and outright fraud, to date regulators in the EU have largely responded to these risks in an ad hoc and incomplete fashion, rather than embedding the mechanisms for operational accountability into the regulatory frameworks that govern green trading arrangements. Finally, this article identifies and prescribes five essential pillars for market-based programmes for the environment that are necessary to provide operational safeguards. These include informational safeguards, transparency standards, rule of law safeguards, verifiable performance standards and financial fidelity rules.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Principles of Administrative Discretion: A Case Study of Pakistan The Tension between Global Public Procurement Law and Nationalist/Populist Tendencies: Proposals for Reform Inhabiting Different Realities: Incrementalism, Paradigms and the New Prospect Public Administration Reform in Bulgaria: Top-down and Externally-driven Approach Una Revisión a Los Servicios Públicos de Solidaridad en la Unión Europea (A Review to the Notion of Social Services of General Interest in the European Union )
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1