J. Alcocer, E. Arce, L. Zambrano, X. Chiappa-Carrara
{"title":"一种受威胁的银鱼物种?","authors":"J. Alcocer, E. Arce, L. Zambrano, X. Chiappa-Carrara","doi":"10.1080/03680770.2009.11902347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The status of local endemic species such as Poblana alchichica is difficult to assess, and therefore conservation measures are not efficiently implemented. However, in recent years several methods have helped compare status of different species based on objective criteria. The method to evaluate the extinction risk of Mexican native species (MER), partially based on Gardenfors et al. (2001), considers 4 criteria regarding the taxon: (1) distribution extent in Mexico, (2) habitat condition, (3) intrinsic biological vulnerability, and (4) human impact on the species. Numerical values are assigned to each criterion in ascending risk order. According to Tambutti et al. (2002), each criterion is independent from the others, and the addition comes to be an accumulative evaluation of risk (SEMARNAT 2002). Even if independently evaluating criteria 2 and 4 is difficult, the grade of each criterion is required to obtain the final assessment. The lack of studies on P. alchichica (Pisces: Atherinidae) – and quite probably for many other species – prevents the accurate quantification of 3 of these 4 criteria (except distribution extent) required for the extinction risk assignation. Previous studies on P. alchichica (Fig. 1) are solely taxonomic. De Buen (1945) described the new silverside species collected from Lake Alchichica. Later, Alvarez (1950) and Guerra Magana (1986) considered Alchichica’s silverside to be a subspecies (P. alchichica alchichica). However, Miller (1986), in his study on the origin and geography of the fishes of Central Mexico, and Espinosa et al. (1993), in their list of Mexican freshwater fishes, re-evaluated the specific status of P. alchichica. Our study aimed to provide scientific data to support (a) the actual risk status of P. alchichica by identifying the factors imposing risk to the species through habitat alteration and population status, and (b) to design adequate protection programs for this species.","PeriodicalId":404196,"journal":{"name":"Internationale Vereinigung für theoretische und angewandte Limnologie: Verhandlungen","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Poblana alchichica: A threatened silverside species?\",\"authors\":\"J. Alcocer, E. Arce, L. Zambrano, X. Chiappa-Carrara\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03680770.2009.11902347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The status of local endemic species such as Poblana alchichica is difficult to assess, and therefore conservation measures are not efficiently implemented. However, in recent years several methods have helped compare status of different species based on objective criteria. The method to evaluate the extinction risk of Mexican native species (MER), partially based on Gardenfors et al. (2001), considers 4 criteria regarding the taxon: (1) distribution extent in Mexico, (2) habitat condition, (3) intrinsic biological vulnerability, and (4) human impact on the species. Numerical values are assigned to each criterion in ascending risk order. According to Tambutti et al. (2002), each criterion is independent from the others, and the addition comes to be an accumulative evaluation of risk (SEMARNAT 2002). Even if independently evaluating criteria 2 and 4 is difficult, the grade of each criterion is required to obtain the final assessment. The lack of studies on P. alchichica (Pisces: Atherinidae) – and quite probably for many other species – prevents the accurate quantification of 3 of these 4 criteria (except distribution extent) required for the extinction risk assignation. Previous studies on P. alchichica (Fig. 1) are solely taxonomic. De Buen (1945) described the new silverside species collected from Lake Alchichica. Later, Alvarez (1950) and Guerra Magana (1986) considered Alchichica’s silverside to be a subspecies (P. alchichica alchichica). However, Miller (1986), in his study on the origin and geography of the fishes of Central Mexico, and Espinosa et al. (1993), in their list of Mexican freshwater fishes, re-evaluated the specific status of P. alchichica. Our study aimed to provide scientific data to support (a) the actual risk status of P. alchichica by identifying the factors imposing risk to the species through habitat alteration and population status, and (b) to design adequate protection programs for this species.\",\"PeriodicalId\":404196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internationale Vereinigung für theoretische und angewandte Limnologie: Verhandlungen\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internationale Vereinigung für theoretische und angewandte Limnologie: Verhandlungen\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03680770.2009.11902347\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internationale Vereinigung für theoretische und angewandte Limnologie: Verhandlungen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03680770.2009.11902347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
摘要
当地特有物种如扁豆的现状难以评估,因此保护措施未能有效实施。然而,近年来有几种方法可以根据客观标准比较不同物种的状况。部分基于Gardenfors et al.(2001)的墨西哥本土物种(MER)灭绝风险评估方法考虑了4个分类单元标准:(1)在墨西哥的分布范围,(2)栖息地条件,(3)内在生物脆弱性,(4)人类对该物种的影响。数值按风险升序分配给每个标准。根据Tambutti et al.(2002)的观点,每个标准都是独立于其他标准的,它们的相加是对风险的累积评估(SEMARNAT 2002)。即使独立评价标准2和4是困难的,也需要每个标准的等级来获得最终的评价。缺乏对P. alchichica(双鱼座:Atherinidae)的研究——很可能对许多其他物种也是如此——阻碍了对灭绝风险分配所需的4个标准中的3个标准的准确量化(分布范围除外)。以往对P. alchichica(图1)的研究仅仅是分类学上的。De Buen(1945)描述了从Alchichica湖收集的新银鱼种。后来,Alvarez(1950)和Guerra Magana(1986)认为Alchichica 's silverside是一个亚种(P. Alchichica Alchichica)。然而,Miller(1986)在他对墨西哥中部鱼类的起源和地理的研究中,以及Espinosa等人(1993)在他们的墨西哥淡水鱼名单中,重新评估了P. alchichica的具体地位。本研究旨在通过生境的改变和种群的变化来确定影响该物种风险的因素,从而为该物种的实际风险状况提供科学依据;为该物种的保护规划提供科学依据。
Poblana alchichica: A threatened silverside species?
The status of local endemic species such as Poblana alchichica is difficult to assess, and therefore conservation measures are not efficiently implemented. However, in recent years several methods have helped compare status of different species based on objective criteria. The method to evaluate the extinction risk of Mexican native species (MER), partially based on Gardenfors et al. (2001), considers 4 criteria regarding the taxon: (1) distribution extent in Mexico, (2) habitat condition, (3) intrinsic biological vulnerability, and (4) human impact on the species. Numerical values are assigned to each criterion in ascending risk order. According to Tambutti et al. (2002), each criterion is independent from the others, and the addition comes to be an accumulative evaluation of risk (SEMARNAT 2002). Even if independently evaluating criteria 2 and 4 is difficult, the grade of each criterion is required to obtain the final assessment. The lack of studies on P. alchichica (Pisces: Atherinidae) – and quite probably for many other species – prevents the accurate quantification of 3 of these 4 criteria (except distribution extent) required for the extinction risk assignation. Previous studies on P. alchichica (Fig. 1) are solely taxonomic. De Buen (1945) described the new silverside species collected from Lake Alchichica. Later, Alvarez (1950) and Guerra Magana (1986) considered Alchichica’s silverside to be a subspecies (P. alchichica alchichica). However, Miller (1986), in his study on the origin and geography of the fishes of Central Mexico, and Espinosa et al. (1993), in their list of Mexican freshwater fishes, re-evaluated the specific status of P. alchichica. Our study aimed to provide scientific data to support (a) the actual risk status of P. alchichica by identifying the factors imposing risk to the species through habitat alteration and population status, and (b) to design adequate protection programs for this species.