可操作IR应用的评估:通用性和自动化

Melanie Imhof, Martin Braschler, P. Hansen, Stefan Rietberger
{"title":"可操作IR应用的评估:通用性和自动化","authors":"Melanie Imhof, Martin Braschler, P. Hansen, Stefan Rietberger","doi":"10.1145/2513150.2513160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Black box information retrieval (IR) application evaluation allows practitioners to measure the quality of their IR application. Instead of evaluating specific components, e.g. solely the search engine, a complete IR application, including the user's perspective, is evaluated. The evaluation methodology is designed to be applicable to operational IR applications. The black box evaluation methodology could be packaged into an evaluation and monitoring tool, making it usable for industry stakeholders. The tool should lead practitioners through the evaluation process and maintain the test results for the manual and automatic tests. This paper shows that the methodology is generalizable, even though the diversity of IR applications is high. The challenges in automating tests are the simulation of tasks that require intellectual effort and the handling of different visualizations of the same concept.","PeriodicalId":436800,"journal":{"name":"LivingLab '13","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation for operational IR applications: generalizability and automation\",\"authors\":\"Melanie Imhof, Martin Braschler, P. Hansen, Stefan Rietberger\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2513150.2513160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Black box information retrieval (IR) application evaluation allows practitioners to measure the quality of their IR application. Instead of evaluating specific components, e.g. solely the search engine, a complete IR application, including the user's perspective, is evaluated. The evaluation methodology is designed to be applicable to operational IR applications. The black box evaluation methodology could be packaged into an evaluation and monitoring tool, making it usable for industry stakeholders. The tool should lead practitioners through the evaluation process and maintain the test results for the manual and automatic tests. This paper shows that the methodology is generalizable, even though the diversity of IR applications is high. The challenges in automating tests are the simulation of tasks that require intellectual effort and the handling of different visualizations of the same concept.\",\"PeriodicalId\":436800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LivingLab '13\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LivingLab '13\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2513150.2513160\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LivingLab '13","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2513150.2513160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

黑盒信息检索(IR)应用程序评估允许从业者衡量其IR应用程序的质量。而不是评估特定的组件,例如单独的搜索引擎,一个完整的IR应用程序,包括用户的视角,被评估。评估方法的设计是为了适用于实际的IR应用。黑盒评估方法可以打包成评估和监控工具,使其可用于行业利益相关者。该工具应该引导从业者通过评估过程,并维护手动和自动测试的测试结果。本文表明,尽管红外应用的多样性很高,但该方法是可推广的。自动化测试的挑战在于模拟需要脑力劳动的任务,以及处理同一概念的不同可视化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation for operational IR applications: generalizability and automation
Black box information retrieval (IR) application evaluation allows practitioners to measure the quality of their IR application. Instead of evaluating specific components, e.g. solely the search engine, a complete IR application, including the user's perspective, is evaluated. The evaluation methodology is designed to be applicable to operational IR applications. The black box evaluation methodology could be packaged into an evaluation and monitoring tool, making it usable for industry stakeholders. The tool should lead practitioners through the evaluation process and maintain the test results for the manual and automatic tests. This paper shows that the methodology is generalizable, even though the diversity of IR applications is high. The challenges in automating tests are the simulation of tasks that require intellectual effort and the handling of different visualizations of the same concept.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using CrowdLogger for in situ information retrieval system evaluation Online metrics for web search relevance Lerot: an online learning to rank framework Evaluation for operational IR applications: generalizability and automation Factors affecting conditions of trust in participant recruiting and retention: a position paper
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1