{"title":"运用思维配对、分享与头脑风暴策略对中低年级学生个人社会智力发展的影响:比较研究","authors":"N. Ibrahim, A. Hammad","doi":"10.54940/ep80378302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This study aimed at practically comparing thing – pair and share vs brain stroming strategies in the development of personal – social intelligence, among three groups: 1st experimental group who were taught by think – pair and share strategy; 2nd experimental group who were taught by brain storming strategy and the control group who were taught by traditional teaching strategies. Data were collected through a pre- test in personal social intelligence, creative thinking scale and posttest. Results revealed statistically significant differences at (α≤ 0.05) level between experimental groups students means coves and those of control group students the post measures for each of personal – social intelligence, where experimental, outperformed controls.","PeriodicalId":402392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Educational and Psychological Sciences","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of employing think – pair and share vs brain storming strategy in the development of personal – social intelligence, among intermediate stage students: A comparative study\",\"authors\":\"N. Ibrahim, A. Hammad\",\"doi\":\"10.54940/ep80378302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": This study aimed at practically comparing thing – pair and share vs brain stroming strategies in the development of personal – social intelligence, among three groups: 1st experimental group who were taught by think – pair and share strategy; 2nd experimental group who were taught by brain storming strategy and the control group who were taught by traditional teaching strategies. Data were collected through a pre- test in personal social intelligence, creative thinking scale and posttest. Results revealed statistically significant differences at (α≤ 0.05) level between experimental groups students means coves and those of control group students the post measures for each of personal – social intelligence, where experimental, outperformed controls.\",\"PeriodicalId\":402392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Educational and Psychological Sciences\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Educational and Psychological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54940/ep80378302\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Educational and Psychological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54940/ep80378302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The effect of employing think – pair and share vs brain storming strategy in the development of personal – social intelligence, among intermediate stage students: A comparative study
: This study aimed at practically comparing thing – pair and share vs brain stroming strategies in the development of personal – social intelligence, among three groups: 1st experimental group who were taught by think – pair and share strategy; 2nd experimental group who were taught by brain storming strategy and the control group who were taught by traditional teaching strategies. Data were collected through a pre- test in personal social intelligence, creative thinking scale and posttest. Results revealed statistically significant differences at (α≤ 0.05) level between experimental groups students means coves and those of control group students the post measures for each of personal – social intelligence, where experimental, outperformed controls.