Glasnik prava Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.46793/gp.1302.25v
Mirko Voštinić
{"title":"VIŠESTRUKI POVRAT U POZITIVNOM KRIVIČNOM ZAKONODAVSTVU","authors":"Mirko Voštinić","doi":"10.46793/gp.1302.25v","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the paper, the author deals with the issue of repeated offence in positive criminal law, as an institution that, along with life imprisonment, caused the most controversy after the last changes to the Criminal Code. First of all, the historical development of this institute, which existed in our post-war law for many decades, was pointed out. Then numerous problems in its application were pointed out, which was often contributed to by different attitudes, not only of the lower courts, but also of the highest courts. Although the provision regulating repeated offence is apparently clear, in only three years of existence of this institute, numerous problems have arisen in practical application. For this reason, the paper pointed out the issue of cumulative application of the conditions of repeated offence prescribed by the Code, the issue of how to calculate half of the range of the prescribed penalty, the issue of application in the case of fines, etc. It is fundamentally important to give adequate answers to all disputed questions, because the incorrect application of the provision on repeated offence, on the one hand, can seriously threaten the rights of the defendant, and on the other hand, make sense of the application of this institute meaningless.","PeriodicalId":399228,"journal":{"name":"Glasnik prava","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Glasnik prava","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46793/gp.1302.25v","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,作者探讨了实在法中的重犯问题,作为一项制度,与终身监禁一起,在刑法最后一次修改后引起了最大的争议。首先,指出了这一制度在我国战后法律中存在了几十年的历史发展。然后指出了其适用中的许多问题,这些问题往往是由不同的态度造成的,不仅是下级法院,而且是最高法院。虽然管制重复犯罪的规定显然是明确的,但在该机构成立仅三年的时间里,在实际应用中出现了许多问题。为此,本文指出了《刑法》规定的重复犯罪条件的累加适用问题、规定处罚幅度的一半如何计算问题、罚款情况下的适用问题等。对所有有争议的问题给予充分的回答是至关重要的,因为不正确地适用重复犯罪的规定一方面会严重威胁被告的权利,另一方面也会使这一制度的适用变得毫无意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
VIŠESTRUKI POVRAT U POZITIVNOM KRIVIČNOM ZAKONODAVSTVU
In the paper, the author deals with the issue of repeated offence in positive criminal law, as an institution that, along with life imprisonment, caused the most controversy after the last changes to the Criminal Code. First of all, the historical development of this institute, which existed in our post-war law for many decades, was pointed out. Then numerous problems in its application were pointed out, which was often contributed to by different attitudes, not only of the lower courts, but also of the highest courts. Although the provision regulating repeated offence is apparently clear, in only three years of existence of this institute, numerous problems have arisen in practical application. For this reason, the paper pointed out the issue of cumulative application of the conditions of repeated offence prescribed by the Code, the issue of how to calculate half of the range of the prescribed penalty, the issue of application in the case of fines, etc. It is fundamentally important to give adequate answers to all disputed questions, because the incorrect application of the provision on repeated offence, on the one hand, can seriously threaten the rights of the defendant, and on the other hand, make sense of the application of this institute meaningless.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
THE EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES IN MONTENEGRO: LEGE LATA AND EUROPEAN STANDARDS NABAVLjANjE, DRŽANjE I NOŠENjE ORUŽJA PO ZAKONU O ORUŽJU I MUNICIJI U REPUBLICI SRBIJI LJUDSKA PRAVA NA RADNOM MJESTU – PRAVO NA PRIVATNOST VIŠESTRUKI POVRAT U POZITIVNOM KRIVIČNOM ZAKONODAVSTVU PRAVNA DRŽAVA I MEDIJI – KANONI MEDIJSKOG PRAVA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1