改变关于教师发展的对话——这真的是一个“海市蜃楼”吗?《海市蜃楼:面对教师发展的艰难现实与教师发展的实践者视角》分析述评

Gabriela E. Gui
{"title":"改变关于教师发展的对话——这真的是一个“海市蜃楼”吗?《海市蜃楼:面对教师发展的艰难现实与教师发展的实践者视角》分析述评","authors":"Gabriela E. Gui","doi":"10.30845/JESP.V7N4P7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"TNTP’s The Mirage: Confronting the Hard Truth About Our Quest for Teacher Development(TNTP, 2015) was a study released in August 2015.Usingdatacollected from three large, geographically diverse public schools and one mid-sized charter network, the study argues that, despite of tremendous investment of financial resources, time, and good will in teacher development, there are very modest returns on this investment. The authors contend that we do not know how to improve teachers at scale, making the goal of effective professional development a mirage. Recommendations suggested by the authors include redefining teacher development; reevaluatingtheeffectiveness of current supports and programs; and reinventing the way effective teaching is supported at scale. The study’s strength is in the rich descriptive information provided. However, the authors make poor analytic choices, rendering somewhat inaccurate conclusions, and thus limiting the study’s usefulness.","PeriodicalId":170810,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education & Social Policy","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changing the Conversation about Teacher Development – Is It, Truly, a “Mirage”? An Analytical Review of The Mirage: Confronting the Hard Truth about Our Quest for Teacher Development and a Practitioner’s Perspective on Teacher Development\",\"authors\":\"Gabriela E. Gui\",\"doi\":\"10.30845/JESP.V7N4P7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"TNTP’s The Mirage: Confronting the Hard Truth About Our Quest for Teacher Development(TNTP, 2015) was a study released in August 2015.Usingdatacollected from three large, geographically diverse public schools and one mid-sized charter network, the study argues that, despite of tremendous investment of financial resources, time, and good will in teacher development, there are very modest returns on this investment. The authors contend that we do not know how to improve teachers at scale, making the goal of effective professional development a mirage. Recommendations suggested by the authors include redefining teacher development; reevaluatingtheeffectiveness of current supports and programs; and reinventing the way effective teaching is supported at scale. The study’s strength is in the rich descriptive information provided. However, the authors make poor analytic choices, rendering somewhat inaccurate conclusions, and thus limiting the study’s usefulness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Education & Social Policy\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Education & Social Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30845/JESP.V7N4P7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education & Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30845/JESP.V7N4P7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

TNTP的《海市蜃楼:面对我们追求教师发展的艰难事实》(TNTP, 2015)是2015年8月发布的一项研究。该研究使用了从三所地理位置各异的大型公立学校和一所中等规模的特许学校网络收集的数据,认为尽管在教师发展方面投入了大量的财力、时间和善意,但这些投资的回报非常有限。作者认为,我们不知道如何大规模地提高教师,使有效的专业发展目标成为海市蜃楼。作者提出的建议包括:重新定义教师发展;重新评估当前支持和项目的有效性;重塑大规模支持有效教学的方式。这项研究的优势在于提供了丰富的描述性信息。然而,作者做出了糟糕的分析选择,得出了一些不准确的结论,从而限制了研究的有用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Changing the Conversation about Teacher Development – Is It, Truly, a “Mirage”? An Analytical Review of The Mirage: Confronting the Hard Truth about Our Quest for Teacher Development and a Practitioner’s Perspective on Teacher Development
TNTP’s The Mirage: Confronting the Hard Truth About Our Quest for Teacher Development(TNTP, 2015) was a study released in August 2015.Usingdatacollected from three large, geographically diverse public schools and one mid-sized charter network, the study argues that, despite of tremendous investment of financial resources, time, and good will in teacher development, there are very modest returns on this investment. The authors contend that we do not know how to improve teachers at scale, making the goal of effective professional development a mirage. Recommendations suggested by the authors include redefining teacher development; reevaluatingtheeffectiveness of current supports and programs; and reinventing the way effective teaching is supported at scale. The study’s strength is in the rich descriptive information provided. However, the authors make poor analytic choices, rendering somewhat inaccurate conclusions, and thus limiting the study’s usefulness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From RAE to REF: Trust and Atmosphere in UK Higher Education Reform Religious Education of Lifelong Learning in Taiwan Weixin Shengjiao I Ching University The Manifestation of Alienation in Sylvia Plath’s the Bell Jar Female Technology Leaders Overcome Barriers to Climb the US Industry Ladder Debunking Hattie: Evaluating the Contribution of Academic Studies to Policy Development and Implementation in Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1