中世纪穆斯林资料中马什里格语和马格里布语的边界建构

Giovanna Calasso
{"title":"中世纪穆斯林资料中马什里格语和马格里布语的边界建构","authors":"Giovanna Calasso","doi":"10.1515/9783110713305-002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The classification of the world’s many facets – its territories, populations, languages and history – is one of the fields where the differences between cultures become most evident. Likewise, within a single cultural milieu, such classifications reveal the changes that occur over time in the way of conceiving oneself and others. It is also a field where the need to separate, to establish differences, and thus identities, is continuously held in check by networks of relationships that prove divides wrong, contradicting labels and classifications. The second volume of the New Cambridge History of Islam, entitled The Western Islamic World: Eleventh to Eighteenth Centuries, is a case in point. At first glance, it follows a rather unusual geopolitical structure, including, apart from the predictable first section on “Al-Andalus and North and West Africa (Eleventh to Fifteenth Centuries)”, a second one on Egypt and Syria (11th c. until the Ottoman conquest), as well as a third one on Muslim Anatolia and the Ottoman Empire. It then returns to “North and West Africa (Sixteenth to Eighteenth Centuries)”, and concludes with a chapter dedicated to the “Ottoman Maghreb”. Thus, the label “Western Islamic World”, considered over a period spanning from the 11th century to the 18th century, applies here to a much wider geographical domain than one might expect. However, as can be inferred from Maribel Fierro’s introduction to the volume, the Mediterranean orientation of the political powers and commercial trends, as well as the encounter/clash with Christian Europe, are the main elements binding together geographical areas that are not always strictly “western”. Meanwhile, the regions viewed as the Islamic East – including Iran and Central Asia – were much more profoundly influenced by the encounter/clash with Indian and Chinese civilizations.1 Yet, as observed by the editors of the volume dedicated to The Eastern Islamic World, “crudely severing the lands","PeriodicalId":198010,"journal":{"name":"The Maghrib in the Mashriq","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constructing the Boundary between Mashriq and Maghrib in Medieval Muslim Sources\",\"authors\":\"Giovanna Calasso\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9783110713305-002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The classification of the world’s many facets – its territories, populations, languages and history – is one of the fields where the differences between cultures become most evident. Likewise, within a single cultural milieu, such classifications reveal the changes that occur over time in the way of conceiving oneself and others. It is also a field where the need to separate, to establish differences, and thus identities, is continuously held in check by networks of relationships that prove divides wrong, contradicting labels and classifications. The second volume of the New Cambridge History of Islam, entitled The Western Islamic World: Eleventh to Eighteenth Centuries, is a case in point. At first glance, it follows a rather unusual geopolitical structure, including, apart from the predictable first section on “Al-Andalus and North and West Africa (Eleventh to Fifteenth Centuries)”, a second one on Egypt and Syria (11th c. until the Ottoman conquest), as well as a third one on Muslim Anatolia and the Ottoman Empire. It then returns to “North and West Africa (Sixteenth to Eighteenth Centuries)”, and concludes with a chapter dedicated to the “Ottoman Maghreb”. Thus, the label “Western Islamic World”, considered over a period spanning from the 11th century to the 18th century, applies here to a much wider geographical domain than one might expect. However, as can be inferred from Maribel Fierro’s introduction to the volume, the Mediterranean orientation of the political powers and commercial trends, as well as the encounter/clash with Christian Europe, are the main elements binding together geographical areas that are not always strictly “western”. Meanwhile, the regions viewed as the Islamic East – including Iran and Central Asia – were much more profoundly influenced by the encounter/clash with Indian and Chinese civilizations.1 Yet, as observed by the editors of the volume dedicated to The Eastern Islamic World, “crudely severing the lands\",\"PeriodicalId\":198010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Maghrib in the Mashriq\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Maghrib in the Mashriq\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110713305-002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Maghrib in the Mashriq","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110713305-002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

世界的许多方面- -其领土、人口、语言和历史- -的分类是文化差异变得最明显的领域之一。同样,在单一的文化环境中,这种分类揭示了随着时间的推移,人们对自己和他人的看法发生了变化。在这个领域,区分、建立差异和身份认同的需要,不断受到各种关系网络的制约,这些关系网络证明划分是错误的,与标签和分类相矛盾。《新剑桥伊斯兰史》第二卷题为《西方伊斯兰世界:11至18世纪》就是一个很好的例子。乍一看,它遵循了一个相当不寻常的地缘政治结构,除了可以预见的第一部分“安达卢斯和北非、西非(11世纪至15世纪)”之外,第二部分是关于埃及和叙利亚(公元11世纪至奥斯曼征服),第三部分是关于穆斯林安纳托利亚和奥斯曼帝国。然后又回到了“北非和西非(16世纪到18世纪)”,最后用一章专门介绍了“奥斯曼马格里布”。因此,从11世纪到18世纪,“西方伊斯兰世界”这个标签适用于比人们想象的更广泛的地理领域。然而,从Maribel Fierro对本书的介绍中可以推断,政治力量和商业趋势的地中海方向,以及与基督教欧洲的相遇/冲突,是将地理区域联系在一起的主要因素,这些地理区域并不总是严格的“西方”。与此同时,被视为伊斯兰东方的地区——包括伊朗和中亚——受到与印度和中国文明相遇/冲突的影响要深刻得多然而,正如《东方伊斯兰世界》一书的编辑们所观察到的那样,“粗暴地割裂了土地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Constructing the Boundary between Mashriq and Maghrib in Medieval Muslim Sources
The classification of the world’s many facets – its territories, populations, languages and history – is one of the fields where the differences between cultures become most evident. Likewise, within a single cultural milieu, such classifications reveal the changes that occur over time in the way of conceiving oneself and others. It is also a field where the need to separate, to establish differences, and thus identities, is continuously held in check by networks of relationships that prove divides wrong, contradicting labels and classifications. The second volume of the New Cambridge History of Islam, entitled The Western Islamic World: Eleventh to Eighteenth Centuries, is a case in point. At first glance, it follows a rather unusual geopolitical structure, including, apart from the predictable first section on “Al-Andalus and North and West Africa (Eleventh to Fifteenth Centuries)”, a second one on Egypt and Syria (11th c. until the Ottoman conquest), as well as a third one on Muslim Anatolia and the Ottoman Empire. It then returns to “North and West Africa (Sixteenth to Eighteenth Centuries)”, and concludes with a chapter dedicated to the “Ottoman Maghreb”. Thus, the label “Western Islamic World”, considered over a period spanning from the 11th century to the 18th century, applies here to a much wider geographical domain than one might expect. However, as can be inferred from Maribel Fierro’s introduction to the volume, the Mediterranean orientation of the political powers and commercial trends, as well as the encounter/clash with Christian Europe, are the main elements binding together geographical areas that are not always strictly “western”. Meanwhile, the regions viewed as the Islamic East – including Iran and Central Asia – were much more profoundly influenced by the encounter/clash with Indian and Chinese civilizations.1 Yet, as observed by the editors of the volume dedicated to The Eastern Islamic World, “crudely severing the lands
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Andalusi Romance Terms in Kitāb al-Simāt fī asmāʾ al-nabāt, by al-Suwaydī of Damascus (d. 690 H/1291 CE) Lost Somewhere in Between? On the Transmission of History from Islamic West to East in Premodern Times: The Case of the Almohad Caliph Abū Yūsuf Yaʿqūb and the Battle of Alarcos The Impact of Maghribi Ḥadīth Commentaries on the Mashriq Traces of the Medieval Islamic West in Modern East Africa: Andalusi and Maghribi Works in the Horn of Africa The Influence of Andalusi Ṣūfism on the Central Islamicate World: Ibn Sabʿīn’s son and his Kitāb al-Sulūk fī ṭarīq al-qawm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1