用荧光原位杂交和免疫组织化学在原发性乳腺癌组织微阵列上标准化HER2状态的经验

Kyeongmee Park, Sehwan Han
{"title":"用荧光原位杂交和免疫组织化学在原发性乳腺癌组织微阵列上标准化HER2状态的经验","authors":"Kyeongmee Park, Sehwan Han","doi":"10.4048/JKBCS.2004.7.1.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Most tests developed for the determination of the HER2 status still require validation, although identification of the HER2 status is important for predicting the response to specific systemic therapy in breast cancer. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were performed for the HER2 expression on the tissue microarray (TMA) from primary breast cancers to validate the feasibility of IHC for HER2 assay. Methods: A TMA was constructed from 134∼231 primary breast cancers. FISH and IHC were repeated more than twice, and the results were analyzed. Three kinds of primary antibody for IHC were used and compared. Results: The HER2 was amplified by FISH in 24∼28% of breast cancer with a concordance between multiple assays of 92∼100% (kappa=0.994-0.965), while the HER2 was overexpressed in 21∼27% by IHC. The HER2 was amplified in 70∼100% of the IHC 3+ cases, but was observed in only 45∼78% and 5∼12% of the IHC 2+ and IHC 0∼1+ cases, respectively. The results from the IHC, using 3 different primary antibodies to HER2, were in good agreement each other at 88∼92% (kappa=0.902-0.799). Conclusion: The results of the FISH appeared to be more reproducible than those of the IHC in the current study. The results of the IHC were not different from each other according to primary antibody used. However, a considerable proportions of the IHC positive cases were not confirmed by the FISH. This report indicates a need to improve the laboratory quality control measures when using the IHC for the HER2 assay, including the periodic testing for the concordance with FISH. (Journal of Korean Breast Cancer Society 2004;7:27-31)","PeriodicalId":414717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Breast Cancer Society","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Single Institute's Experience of Standardization for the HER2 Status by Fluorescence in situ Hybridization and Immunohistochemistry on a Primary Breast Cancer Tissue Microarray\",\"authors\":\"Kyeongmee Park, Sehwan Han\",\"doi\":\"10.4048/JKBCS.2004.7.1.27\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Most tests developed for the determination of the HER2 status still require validation, although identification of the HER2 status is important for predicting the response to specific systemic therapy in breast cancer. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were performed for the HER2 expression on the tissue microarray (TMA) from primary breast cancers to validate the feasibility of IHC for HER2 assay. Methods: A TMA was constructed from 134∼231 primary breast cancers. FISH and IHC were repeated more than twice, and the results were analyzed. Three kinds of primary antibody for IHC were used and compared. Results: The HER2 was amplified by FISH in 24∼28% of breast cancer with a concordance between multiple assays of 92∼100% (kappa=0.994-0.965), while the HER2 was overexpressed in 21∼27% by IHC. The HER2 was amplified in 70∼100% of the IHC 3+ cases, but was observed in only 45∼78% and 5∼12% of the IHC 2+ and IHC 0∼1+ cases, respectively. The results from the IHC, using 3 different primary antibodies to HER2, were in good agreement each other at 88∼92% (kappa=0.902-0.799). Conclusion: The results of the FISH appeared to be more reproducible than those of the IHC in the current study. The results of the IHC were not different from each other according to primary antibody used. However, a considerable proportions of the IHC positive cases were not confirmed by the FISH. This report indicates a need to improve the laboratory quality control measures when using the IHC for the HER2 assay, including the periodic testing for the concordance with FISH. (Journal of Korean Breast Cancer Society 2004;7:27-31)\",\"PeriodicalId\":414717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Korean Breast Cancer Society\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Korean Breast Cancer Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4048/JKBCS.2004.7.1.27\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Breast Cancer Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4048/JKBCS.2004.7.1.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:大多数用于确定HER2状态的测试仍然需要验证,尽管确定HER2状态对于预测乳腺癌特异性全身治疗的反应很重要。采用荧光原位杂交(FISH)和免疫组化(IHC)检测原发性乳腺癌组织微阵列(TMA)上HER2的表达,验证IHC检测HER2的可行性。方法:从134 ~ 231例原发性乳腺癌中构建TMA。FISH和IHC重复两次以上,并对结果进行分析。采用三种免疫组化一抗进行比较。结果:HER2在24 ~ 28%的乳腺癌中被FISH扩增,多次检测的一致性为92 ~ 100% (kappa=0.994-0.965),而在21 ~ 27%的乳腺癌中被IHC过表达。HER2在70% ~ 100%的IHC 3+病例中扩增,但在IHC 2+和IHC 0 ~ 1+病例中分别仅为45 ~ 78%和5 ~ 12%。使用3种不同的HER2一抗的免疫组化结果在88 ~ 92%之间一致性很好(kappa=0.902-0.799)。结论:在本研究中,FISH的结果似乎比IHC的结果更具可重复性。不同一抗的免疫组化结果无差异。然而,相当大比例的免疫组化阳性病例没有得到FISH的确认。本报告指出,在使用IHC进行HER2测定时,需要改进实验室质量控制措施,包括定期检测与FISH的一致性。(韩国乳腺癌学会杂志2004;7:27-31)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Single Institute's Experience of Standardization for the HER2 Status by Fluorescence in situ Hybridization and Immunohistochemistry on a Primary Breast Cancer Tissue Microarray
Purpose: Most tests developed for the determination of the HER2 status still require validation, although identification of the HER2 status is important for predicting the response to specific systemic therapy in breast cancer. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were performed for the HER2 expression on the tissue microarray (TMA) from primary breast cancers to validate the feasibility of IHC for HER2 assay. Methods: A TMA was constructed from 134∼231 primary breast cancers. FISH and IHC were repeated more than twice, and the results were analyzed. Three kinds of primary antibody for IHC were used and compared. Results: The HER2 was amplified by FISH in 24∼28% of breast cancer with a concordance between multiple assays of 92∼100% (kappa=0.994-0.965), while the HER2 was overexpressed in 21∼27% by IHC. The HER2 was amplified in 70∼100% of the IHC 3+ cases, but was observed in only 45∼78% and 5∼12% of the IHC 2+ and IHC 0∼1+ cases, respectively. The results from the IHC, using 3 different primary antibodies to HER2, were in good agreement each other at 88∼92% (kappa=0.902-0.799). Conclusion: The results of the FISH appeared to be more reproducible than those of the IHC in the current study. The results of the IHC were not different from each other according to primary antibody used. However, a considerable proportions of the IHC positive cases were not confirmed by the FISH. This report indicates a need to improve the laboratory quality control measures when using the IHC for the HER2 assay, including the periodic testing for the concordance with FISH. (Journal of Korean Breast Cancer Society 2004;7:27-31)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Arising from Axillary Accessory Breast The Analysis of HER-2/neu Gene Status and Correlation with Other Clinico-Pathologic Factors for Breast Cancer Using Tissue Microarray Clinical Correlation of HER-2/neu Overexpression in Patients with Breast Cancer Expression of Survivin in Patients with Breast Cancer Genetic Classification of Breast Cancer based on Unilateral Chromosomal Loss
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1