突发事件中知识结构化的冒险:“知识结构化”和“知识支配”概念在现实工作情境中的应用

Carina Beckerman
{"title":"突发事件中知识结构化的冒险:“知识结构化”和“知识支配”概念在现实工作情境中的应用","authors":"Carina Beckerman","doi":"10.4018/JHDRI.2011010102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper applies two concepts, ‘knowledge structuring’ and ‘knowledge domination,’ to a real life work situation. The purpose is to explore, analyze and discuss what happens when management interferes into the activities of a knowledge worker in a specific organizational setting by computerizing a key document. Exercising knowledge is delicate and complex. This study makes visible how some parts of performing anesthesia become structured and re-structured when the anesthesia patient record is transformed into a knowledge management system at the same time as someone or something influences how that structuring takes place. is going on today. It is also an example of how modern man tries to manage knowledge to create increased values in society. These efforts have many different implications for people involved. This paper is not meant to be a full description on what happens when a patient record is transformed into a knowledge management system. It directs itself towards management and wants to touch on this very important question of how these computerized systems influence the way a specialist or a knowledge worker exercises his or her knowledge. The section that follow presents the theoretical framework used in this paper, then a description of how research has taken place DOI: 10.4018/jhdri.2011010102 14 International Journal of Healthcare Delivery Reform Initiatives, 3(1), 13-23, January-March 2011 Copyright © 2011, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited. is presented, and some information about the research context. THE PRACTICE OF MANAGING KNOWLEDGE IN THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY This research takes place in the knowledge society (Lane, 1966; Bell, 1974; Böhme & Stehr, 1986; Drucker, 1993; Castells, 1996; OECD, 1996). OECD has used the expression “the knowledge-based economies” instead of “the knowledge society” and characterized them as “those which are directly based on the production, distribution and use of knowledge and information”. One important difference between the two expressions “the information society” and “the knowledge society” is that the first one is characterized by low-cost information and a general use of information and communication technology while the key factor in the second is mainly investments in people, utilizing new information and communication technology. In the knowledge society there are a continuous structuring and re-structuring, construction and re-construction and learning and re-learning going on due to implementing new information and communication technology. Knowledge is viewed as localized and embedded in a specialist practice. It is an ongoing social process of construction and collective action in organizations and a cognitive capability that empowers its possessors with the capacity for physical or intellectual action. Exercising knowledge is a structured activity. In our heads we always make plans for what to do, how to do it and what to do next. There is even a specific place in the frontal lobe of the brain that is vital for planning. When an organizational setting is structured the knowledge that is exercised in this setting also becomes structured. I propose that how knowledge is structured depends on who dominates over the knowledge exercised. Professional and specialist knowledge is a matter of both formal education based on scientific knowledge and skills (Abbott, 1988). A professional has the same education as others in the same field but there are better and less good professionals. The difference lies in their capacity to learn from their experience, of acquiring “tacit” knowledge. There is a tacit dimension to all knowledge. Tacit knowledge is learned through experiencing and doing a task, during which the individual develops a feel for and capacity to make intuitive judgments about the successful execution of the activity. Tacit knowledge consists, among other things, of search rules, or heuristics, that identify the problem and the elements consisting of the solution (Polanyi, 1966). They may also be compared to mental schemas or interpretative schemas. Modalities such as interpretive schemes structures interactions in society and organizational settings. They influence theory of coding and this is decided by symbolic orders or modes of discourse. A schema influences the encoding (interpreting and taking in) of new information, memory for old information and inferences about missing information. It is a way of organizing information about the world relevant to a particular task and can be described as a filtering mechanism. Mental schemas are difficult to change. People often ignore exceptions to the schema; they even interpret the exception as proving the schema. Many of the information-processing advantages of schemas would be lost if they changed at each encounter with slightly discrepant information. But having an incorrect schema is also costly since it can make people insufficient problem solvers. The wrong mental schema can lead one to be inaccurate, biasing encoding, memory, and inference. But still schemas are supposed to be cognitively more efficient than understanding each instance afresh (Fiske & Taylor, 1991). There are person schemas, self-schemas, role schemas and event schemas. Interpretative schemas are influenced by the shared understanding of a group of people about a phenomenon. A physician within a certain specialist domain is socialized in how to interpret certain situations and solve certain problems. When doing that he plays the role of a physician. He acts out the role schema of being a doctor. 9 more pages are available in the full version of this document, which may be purchased using the \"Add to Cart\" button on the product's webpage: www.igi-global.com/article/adventure-structuring-knowledgeduring-emergencies/54728?camid=4v1 This title is available in InfoSci-Journals, InfoSci-Journal Disciplines Medicine, Healthcare, and Life Science. Recommend this product to your librarian: www.igi-global.com/e-resources/libraryrecommendation/?id=2","PeriodicalId":352165,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Healthcare Delivery Reform Initiatives","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Adventure of Structuring Knowledge During Emergencies: Applying the Concepts “Knowledge Structuring” and “Knowledge Domination” on a Real-Life Work Situation\",\"authors\":\"Carina Beckerman\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/JHDRI.2011010102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper applies two concepts, ‘knowledge structuring’ and ‘knowledge domination,’ to a real life work situation. The purpose is to explore, analyze and discuss what happens when management interferes into the activities of a knowledge worker in a specific organizational setting by computerizing a key document. Exercising knowledge is delicate and complex. This study makes visible how some parts of performing anesthesia become structured and re-structured when the anesthesia patient record is transformed into a knowledge management system at the same time as someone or something influences how that structuring takes place. is going on today. It is also an example of how modern man tries to manage knowledge to create increased values in society. These efforts have many different implications for people involved. This paper is not meant to be a full description on what happens when a patient record is transformed into a knowledge management system. It directs itself towards management and wants to touch on this very important question of how these computerized systems influence the way a specialist or a knowledge worker exercises his or her knowledge. The section that follow presents the theoretical framework used in this paper, then a description of how research has taken place DOI: 10.4018/jhdri.2011010102 14 International Journal of Healthcare Delivery Reform Initiatives, 3(1), 13-23, January-March 2011 Copyright © 2011, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited. is presented, and some information about the research context. THE PRACTICE OF MANAGING KNOWLEDGE IN THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY This research takes place in the knowledge society (Lane, 1966; Bell, 1974; Böhme & Stehr, 1986; Drucker, 1993; Castells, 1996; OECD, 1996). OECD has used the expression “the knowledge-based economies” instead of “the knowledge society” and characterized them as “those which are directly based on the production, distribution and use of knowledge and information”. One important difference between the two expressions “the information society” and “the knowledge society” is that the first one is characterized by low-cost information and a general use of information and communication technology while the key factor in the second is mainly investments in people, utilizing new information and communication technology. In the knowledge society there are a continuous structuring and re-structuring, construction and re-construction and learning and re-learning going on due to implementing new information and communication technology. Knowledge is viewed as localized and embedded in a specialist practice. It is an ongoing social process of construction and collective action in organizations and a cognitive capability that empowers its possessors with the capacity for physical or intellectual action. Exercising knowledge is a structured activity. In our heads we always make plans for what to do, how to do it and what to do next. There is even a specific place in the frontal lobe of the brain that is vital for planning. When an organizational setting is structured the knowledge that is exercised in this setting also becomes structured. I propose that how knowledge is structured depends on who dominates over the knowledge exercised. Professional and specialist knowledge is a matter of both formal education based on scientific knowledge and skills (Abbott, 1988). A professional has the same education as others in the same field but there are better and less good professionals. The difference lies in their capacity to learn from their experience, of acquiring “tacit” knowledge. There is a tacit dimension to all knowledge. Tacit knowledge is learned through experiencing and doing a task, during which the individual develops a feel for and capacity to make intuitive judgments about the successful execution of the activity. Tacit knowledge consists, among other things, of search rules, or heuristics, that identify the problem and the elements consisting of the solution (Polanyi, 1966). They may also be compared to mental schemas or interpretative schemas. Modalities such as interpretive schemes structures interactions in society and organizational settings. They influence theory of coding and this is decided by symbolic orders or modes of discourse. A schema influences the encoding (interpreting and taking in) of new information, memory for old information and inferences about missing information. It is a way of organizing information about the world relevant to a particular task and can be described as a filtering mechanism. Mental schemas are difficult to change. People often ignore exceptions to the schema; they even interpret the exception as proving the schema. Many of the information-processing advantages of schemas would be lost if they changed at each encounter with slightly discrepant information. But having an incorrect schema is also costly since it can make people insufficient problem solvers. The wrong mental schema can lead one to be inaccurate, biasing encoding, memory, and inference. But still schemas are supposed to be cognitively more efficient than understanding each instance afresh (Fiske & Taylor, 1991). There are person schemas, self-schemas, role schemas and event schemas. Interpretative schemas are influenced by the shared understanding of a group of people about a phenomenon. A physician within a certain specialist domain is socialized in how to interpret certain situations and solve certain problems. When doing that he plays the role of a physician. He acts out the role schema of being a doctor. 9 more pages are available in the full version of this document, which may be purchased using the \\\"Add to Cart\\\" button on the product's webpage: www.igi-global.com/article/adventure-structuring-knowledgeduring-emergencies/54728?camid=4v1 This title is available in InfoSci-Journals, InfoSci-Journal Disciplines Medicine, Healthcare, and Life Science. Recommend this product to your librarian: www.igi-global.com/e-resources/libraryrecommendation/?id=2\",\"PeriodicalId\":352165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Healthcare Delivery Reform Initiatives\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Healthcare Delivery Reform Initiatives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/JHDRI.2011010102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Healthcare Delivery Reform Initiatives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/JHDRI.2011010102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

本文将“知识结构”和“知识支配”两个概念应用于现实生活中的工作情境。目的是探索、分析和讨论当管理人员通过计算机化关键文件干预特定组织环境中知识工作者的活动时会发生什么。运用知识是微妙而复杂的。这项研究表明,当麻醉患者记录被转换为知识管理系统时,麻醉执行的某些部分是如何结构化和重新结构化的,同时有人或物影响了结构的发生。今天正在进行。这也是现代人如何管理知识以创造更多社会价值的一个例子。这些努力对相关人员有许多不同的影响。本文并不打算全面描述将患者记录转换为知识管理系统时会发生什么。它的方向是管理,并希望触及一个非常重要的问题,即这些计算机化系统如何影响专家或知识工作者运用其知识的方式。接下来的部分介绍了本文使用的理论框架,然后描述了研究是如何进行的DOI: 10.4018/jhdri。2014国际医疗服务改革倡议杂志,3(1),13-23,2011年1月- 3月版权所有©2011,IGI Global。未经IGI Global书面许可,禁止以印刷或电子形式复制或分发。的介绍,以及有关研究背景的一些信息。知识社会中的知识管理实践本研究发生在知识社会(Lane, 1966;贝尔,1974;Böhme & Stehr, 1986;德鲁克,1993;中文版1996;经合组织,1996年)。经合组织使用“知识经济”来代替“知识社会”,并将其定义为“直接以知识和信息的生产、分配和使用为基础的经济”。“信息社会”和“知识社会”的一个重要区别是,“信息社会”的特点是信息成本低,普遍使用信息通信技术,而“知识社会”的关键因素主要是对人的投资,利用新的信息通信技术。在知识社会中,由于新的信息通信技术的实施,不断地进行着构建与重构、构建与重构、学习与再学习。知识被视为本地化和嵌入在专业实践中。它是一个持续的社会建设过程和组织中的集体行动,是一种认知能力,赋予其拥有者身体或智力行动的能力。运用知识是一项有组织的活动。在我们的头脑中,我们总是计划要做什么,怎么做,下一步做什么。在大脑额叶中甚至有一个特定的地方对计划至关重要。当一个组织环境是结构化的,在这个环境中运用的知识也变得结构化。我认为知识的结构取决于谁主导了知识的运用。专业知识和专业知识是基于科学知识和技能的正规教育的问题(雅培,1988)。专业人士在同一领域的教育水平和其他人一样,但有更好的和不太好的专业人士。不同之处在于他们从经验中学习的能力,获得“隐性”知识的能力。所有的知识都有一个隐性的维度。隐性知识是通过体验和执行任务来学习的,在此过程中,个体发展了对活动成功执行的感觉和直觉判断的能力。隐性知识包括搜索规则,或启发式,识别问题和组成解决方案的要素(Polanyi, 1966)。它们也可以与心理图式或解释图式进行比较。解释方案等模式在社会和组织环境中构成相互作用。它们影响着编码理论,而这是由符号顺序或话语模式决定的。图式影响新信息的编码(解释和吸收)、对旧信息的记忆和对缺失信息的推断。它是一种组织与特定任务相关的世界信息的方式,可以被描述为过滤机制。心理图式是很难改变的。人们经常忽略模式的例外情况;它们甚至将异常解释为对模式的证明。如果模式在每次遇到稍微不一致的信息时发生变化,那么模式的许多信息处理优势就会丧失。 但是拥有一个不正确的模式也是代价高昂的,因为它会使人们无法解决问题。错误的心理图式会导致不准确的、有偏见的编码、记忆和推理。但是图式仍然被认为比重新理解每个实例更有效(Fiske & Taylor, 1991)。有个人图式,自我图式,角色图式和事件图式。解释图式受到一群人对一种现象的共同理解的影响。某一专业领域的医生在如何解释特定情况和解决特定问题方面是社会化的。当他这样做的时候,他扮演了一个医生的角色。他扮演了医生的角色图式。本文档的完整版还有另外9页,可通过产品网页上的“添加到购物车”按钮购买:www.igi-global.com/article/adventure-structuring-knowledgeduring-emergencies/54728?camid=4v1。本标题可在InfoSci-Journals、InfoSci-Journal journals、医学、保健和生命科学期刊中找到。向您的图书管理员推荐此产品:www.igi-global.com/e-resources/libraryrecommendation/?id=2
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Adventure of Structuring Knowledge During Emergencies: Applying the Concepts “Knowledge Structuring” and “Knowledge Domination” on a Real-Life Work Situation
This paper applies two concepts, ‘knowledge structuring’ and ‘knowledge domination,’ to a real life work situation. The purpose is to explore, analyze and discuss what happens when management interferes into the activities of a knowledge worker in a specific organizational setting by computerizing a key document. Exercising knowledge is delicate and complex. This study makes visible how some parts of performing anesthesia become structured and re-structured when the anesthesia patient record is transformed into a knowledge management system at the same time as someone or something influences how that structuring takes place. is going on today. It is also an example of how modern man tries to manage knowledge to create increased values in society. These efforts have many different implications for people involved. This paper is not meant to be a full description on what happens when a patient record is transformed into a knowledge management system. It directs itself towards management and wants to touch on this very important question of how these computerized systems influence the way a specialist or a knowledge worker exercises his or her knowledge. The section that follow presents the theoretical framework used in this paper, then a description of how research has taken place DOI: 10.4018/jhdri.2011010102 14 International Journal of Healthcare Delivery Reform Initiatives, 3(1), 13-23, January-March 2011 Copyright © 2011, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited. is presented, and some information about the research context. THE PRACTICE OF MANAGING KNOWLEDGE IN THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY This research takes place in the knowledge society (Lane, 1966; Bell, 1974; Böhme & Stehr, 1986; Drucker, 1993; Castells, 1996; OECD, 1996). OECD has used the expression “the knowledge-based economies” instead of “the knowledge society” and characterized them as “those which are directly based on the production, distribution and use of knowledge and information”. One important difference between the two expressions “the information society” and “the knowledge society” is that the first one is characterized by low-cost information and a general use of information and communication technology while the key factor in the second is mainly investments in people, utilizing new information and communication technology. In the knowledge society there are a continuous structuring and re-structuring, construction and re-construction and learning and re-learning going on due to implementing new information and communication technology. Knowledge is viewed as localized and embedded in a specialist practice. It is an ongoing social process of construction and collective action in organizations and a cognitive capability that empowers its possessors with the capacity for physical or intellectual action. Exercising knowledge is a structured activity. In our heads we always make plans for what to do, how to do it and what to do next. There is even a specific place in the frontal lobe of the brain that is vital for planning. When an organizational setting is structured the knowledge that is exercised in this setting also becomes structured. I propose that how knowledge is structured depends on who dominates over the knowledge exercised. Professional and specialist knowledge is a matter of both formal education based on scientific knowledge and skills (Abbott, 1988). A professional has the same education as others in the same field but there are better and less good professionals. The difference lies in their capacity to learn from their experience, of acquiring “tacit” knowledge. There is a tacit dimension to all knowledge. Tacit knowledge is learned through experiencing and doing a task, during which the individual develops a feel for and capacity to make intuitive judgments about the successful execution of the activity. Tacit knowledge consists, among other things, of search rules, or heuristics, that identify the problem and the elements consisting of the solution (Polanyi, 1966). They may also be compared to mental schemas or interpretative schemas. Modalities such as interpretive schemes structures interactions in society and organizational settings. They influence theory of coding and this is decided by symbolic orders or modes of discourse. A schema influences the encoding (interpreting and taking in) of new information, memory for old information and inferences about missing information. It is a way of organizing information about the world relevant to a particular task and can be described as a filtering mechanism. Mental schemas are difficult to change. People often ignore exceptions to the schema; they even interpret the exception as proving the schema. Many of the information-processing advantages of schemas would be lost if they changed at each encounter with slightly discrepant information. But having an incorrect schema is also costly since it can make people insufficient problem solvers. The wrong mental schema can lead one to be inaccurate, biasing encoding, memory, and inference. But still schemas are supposed to be cognitively more efficient than understanding each instance afresh (Fiske & Taylor, 1991). There are person schemas, self-schemas, role schemas and event schemas. Interpretative schemas are influenced by the shared understanding of a group of people about a phenomenon. A physician within a certain specialist domain is socialized in how to interpret certain situations and solve certain problems. When doing that he plays the role of a physician. He acts out the role schema of being a doctor. 9 more pages are available in the full version of this document, which may be purchased using the "Add to Cart" button on the product's webpage: www.igi-global.com/article/adventure-structuring-knowledgeduring-emergencies/54728?camid=4v1 This title is available in InfoSci-Journals, InfoSci-Journal Disciplines Medicine, Healthcare, and Life Science. Recommend this product to your librarian: www.igi-global.com/e-resources/libraryrecommendation/?id=2
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PPP’s Application in Greek Health Infrastructure and Personnel’s Response Predicting Diabetes amongst Native American Elders: The Importance of Comorbid Diseases and their Interactions Clinical Commissioning Groups in the UK: A Knowledge Management Study The telematics infrastructure: The backbone of the German e-health card A Simple Model for a Complex Issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1