反对女性的道德:琼·特隆托对卡罗尔·吉利根的批评

Letícia Spinelli
{"title":"反对女性的道德:琼·特隆托对卡罗尔·吉利根的批评","authors":"Letícia Spinelli","doi":"10.5007/1677-2954.2019v18n2p245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to reconstruct Joan Tronto's critique of Carol Gilligan's model of care ethics. Tronto's analysis comprises, on the one hand, that care is not restricted to a feminine morality, but a morality of groups in the condition of subordination, and, on the other hand (consequently), that one can not theorize care without social contribution. In this aspect, Tronto observes in Gilligan's analysis an essentialist and elitist discourse that seeks to universalize the experience of care from hegemonic groups.","PeriodicalId":143268,"journal":{"name":"Ethic@: an International Journal for Moral Philosophy","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contra uma moralidade das mulheres: a crítica de Joan Tronto a Carol Gilligan\",\"authors\":\"Letícia Spinelli\",\"doi\":\"10.5007/1677-2954.2019v18n2p245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aims to reconstruct Joan Tronto's critique of Carol Gilligan's model of care ethics. Tronto's analysis comprises, on the one hand, that care is not restricted to a feminine morality, but a morality of groups in the condition of subordination, and, on the other hand (consequently), that one can not theorize care without social contribution. In this aspect, Tronto observes in Gilligan's analysis an essentialist and elitist discourse that seeks to universalize the experience of care from hegemonic groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethic@: an International Journal for Moral Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethic@: an International Journal for Moral Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2019v18n2p245\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethic@: an International Journal for Moral Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2019v18n2p245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文旨在重建琼·特朗托对卡罗尔·吉利根的护理伦理模型的批评。特朗托的分析包括,一方面,关心并不局限于女性道德,而是一种处于从属状态的群体道德,另一方面(因此),没有社会贡献,人们就不能将关心理论化。在这方面,特朗托在吉利根的分析中观察到一种本质主义和精英主义的话语,这种话语试图将霸权群体的关怀经验普遍化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Contra uma moralidade das mulheres: a crítica de Joan Tronto a Carol Gilligan
This paper aims to reconstruct Joan Tronto's critique of Carol Gilligan's model of care ethics. Tronto's analysis comprises, on the one hand, that care is not restricted to a feminine morality, but a morality of groups in the condition of subordination, and, on the other hand (consequently), that one can not theorize care without social contribution. In this aspect, Tronto observes in Gilligan's analysis an essentialist and elitist discourse that seeks to universalize the experience of care from hegemonic groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Por que interpretar a teoria ética de Mill como um tipo de utilitarismo de atos The neuroethics of agency: the problem of attributing mental states to people with disorders of consciousness The role of nature in the self-ownership proviso Os novos desafios da ética da neurociência
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1