德国关于例外状态和关于紧急状态的宪法规定的讨论

Eckart Klein
{"title":"德国关于例外状态和关于紧急状态的宪法规定的讨论","authors":"Eckart Klein","doi":"10.5771/9783845298610-125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The state of exception, or however it is called, has always fascinated lawyers. To overcome an anomalous political and/or military situation confronting a State will in many cases require means not available under normal circumstances. How far should the law go in order to cope with such situations? Should it provide any exceptional means at all? How can abuses be avoided? How can the return to normalcy be assured? What can a State do in an emergency if the law has not made available special instruments, or existent provisions prove to be insufficient? May a State derogate from legal rules without being authorized by an express constitutional provision? How far do international rules determine the declaration and application of a state of exception?1 These general questions impact any discussion on the state of exception, and should be thought of before such a situation arises. The first part of my paper will present a general overview of the treatment of the state of exception under the constitutions of the German Empire, the Weimar Republic and the Basic Law, thus covering a period of time from 1871 to the present. Particular focus will be placed on legal debates concerning respective provisions. In the second part of this paper, I shall present the different states of emergency as determined by the German Basic Law and will particularly discuss to what extent the armed forces may be called in, fundamental rights affected and political and legal control mechanisms exist. A general assessment concludes my deliberations. I.","PeriodicalId":371523,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Powers","volume":"183 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The German Discussion on the State of Exception and Constitutional Provisions on States of Emergency\",\"authors\":\"Eckart Klein\",\"doi\":\"10.5771/9783845298610-125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The state of exception, or however it is called, has always fascinated lawyers. To overcome an anomalous political and/or military situation confronting a State will in many cases require means not available under normal circumstances. How far should the law go in order to cope with such situations? Should it provide any exceptional means at all? How can abuses be avoided? How can the return to normalcy be assured? What can a State do in an emergency if the law has not made available special instruments, or existent provisions prove to be insufficient? May a State derogate from legal rules without being authorized by an express constitutional provision? How far do international rules determine the declaration and application of a state of exception?1 These general questions impact any discussion on the state of exception, and should be thought of before such a situation arises. The first part of my paper will present a general overview of the treatment of the state of exception under the constitutions of the German Empire, the Weimar Republic and the Basic Law, thus covering a period of time from 1871 to the present. Particular focus will be placed on legal debates concerning respective provisions. In the second part of this paper, I shall present the different states of emergency as determined by the German Basic Law and will particularly discuss to what extent the armed forces may be called in, fundamental rights affected and political and legal control mechanisms exist. A general assessment concludes my deliberations. I.\",\"PeriodicalId\":371523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency Powers\",\"volume\":\"183 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency Powers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845298610-125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Powers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845298610-125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

例外状态,或者不管它叫什么,一直让律师们着迷。要克服一国面临的异常政治和(或)军事局势,在许多情况下需要在正常情况下无法获得的手段。为了应对这种情况,法律应该走多远?它应该提供任何特殊的手段吗?如何避免滥用?怎样才能保证恢复正常呢?在紧急情况下,如果法律没有提供特别文书,或现有规定证明不够充分,国家可以做些什么?一个国家可以在没有明确的宪法条款授权的情况下克减法律规则吗?国际规则在多大程度上决定例外状态的宣布和适用?这些一般性问题影响到任何关于例外状态的讨论,在这种情况出现之前应该考虑到这些问题。本文的第一部分将概述德意志帝国宪法、魏玛共和国宪法和基本法对例外状态的处理,因此涵盖了从1871年到现在的一段时间。将特别侧重于关于各自条款的法律辩论。在本文的第二部分,我将介绍德国《基本法》所规定的不同紧急状态,并将特别讨论在何种程度上可以动用武装部队、受影响的基本权利以及存在的政治和法律控制机制。一般性评估结束了我的审议。我。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The German Discussion on the State of Exception and Constitutional Provisions on States of Emergency
The state of exception, or however it is called, has always fascinated lawyers. To overcome an anomalous political and/or military situation confronting a State will in many cases require means not available under normal circumstances. How far should the law go in order to cope with such situations? Should it provide any exceptional means at all? How can abuses be avoided? How can the return to normalcy be assured? What can a State do in an emergency if the law has not made available special instruments, or existent provisions prove to be insufficient? May a State derogate from legal rules without being authorized by an express constitutional provision? How far do international rules determine the declaration and application of a state of exception?1 These general questions impact any discussion on the state of exception, and should be thought of before such a situation arises. The first part of my paper will present a general overview of the treatment of the state of exception under the constitutions of the German Empire, the Weimar Republic and the Basic Law, thus covering a period of time from 1871 to the present. Particular focus will be placed on legal debates concerning respective provisions. In the second part of this paper, I shall present the different states of emergency as determined by the German Basic Law and will particularly discuss to what extent the armed forces may be called in, fundamental rights affected and political and legal control mechanisms exist. A general assessment concludes my deliberations. I.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exceptionality in Law The German Discussion on the State of Exception and Constitutional Provisions on States of Emergency On the Validity of Law with Respect to the Exceptional Case To Regulate, or Not to Regulate? A Study on the State of Exception and Its Regulation The Exceptional Case in Situations of Normalcy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1