多程序基准定义

Adam N. Jacobvitz, Andrew D. Hilton, Daniel J. Sorin
{"title":"多程序基准定义","authors":"Adam N. Jacobvitz, Andrew D. Hilton, Daniel J. Sorin","doi":"10.1109/ISPASS.2015.7095786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although definition of single-program benchmarks is relatively straight-forward-a benchmark is a program plus a specific input-definition of multi-program benchmarks is more complex. Each program may have a different runtime and they may have different interactions depending on how they align with each other. While prior work has focused on sampling multiprogram benchmarks, little attention has been paid to defining the benchmarks in their entirety. In this work, we propose a four-tuple that formally defines multi-program benchmarks in a well-defined way. We then examine how four different classes of benchmarks created by varying the elements of this tuple align with real-world use-cases. We evaluate the impact of these variations on real hardware, and see drastic variations in results between different benchmarks constructed from the same programs. Notable differences include significant speedups versus slowdowns (e.g., +57% vs -5% or +26% vs -18%), and large differences in magnitude even when the results are in the same direction (e.g., 67% versus 11%).","PeriodicalId":189378,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software (ISPASS)","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-program benchmark definition\",\"authors\":\"Adam N. Jacobvitz, Andrew D. Hilton, Daniel J. Sorin\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISPASS.2015.7095786\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although definition of single-program benchmarks is relatively straight-forward-a benchmark is a program plus a specific input-definition of multi-program benchmarks is more complex. Each program may have a different runtime and they may have different interactions depending on how they align with each other. While prior work has focused on sampling multiprogram benchmarks, little attention has been paid to defining the benchmarks in their entirety. In this work, we propose a four-tuple that formally defines multi-program benchmarks in a well-defined way. We then examine how four different classes of benchmarks created by varying the elements of this tuple align with real-world use-cases. We evaluate the impact of these variations on real hardware, and see drastic variations in results between different benchmarks constructed from the same programs. Notable differences include significant speedups versus slowdowns (e.g., +57% vs -5% or +26% vs -18%), and large differences in magnitude even when the results are in the same direction (e.g., 67% versus 11%).\",\"PeriodicalId\":189378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software (ISPASS)\",\"volume\":\"108 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software (ISPASS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPASS.2015.7095786\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software (ISPASS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPASS.2015.7095786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

尽管单程序基准的定义相对简单——基准是一个程序加上一个特定的输入——但多程序基准的定义要复杂得多。每个程序可能有不同的运行时,它们可能有不同的交互,这取决于它们如何相互对齐。虽然以前的工作主要集中在采样多程序基准上,但很少注意到完整地定义基准。在这项工作中,我们提出了一个四元组,以一种定义良好的方式正式定义多程序基准。然后,我们将研究通过改变这个元组的元素创建的四种不同的基准是如何与实际用例保持一致的。我们评估了这些变化对实际硬件的影响,并看到了由相同程序构建的不同基准测试之间结果的巨大差异。值得注意的差异包括显著的加速与减速(例如,+57% vs -5%或+26% vs -18%),以及即使结果在相同方向上(例如,67% vs 11%),幅度上的差异也很大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multi-program benchmark definition
Although definition of single-program benchmarks is relatively straight-forward-a benchmark is a program plus a specific input-definition of multi-program benchmarks is more complex. Each program may have a different runtime and they may have different interactions depending on how they align with each other. While prior work has focused on sampling multiprogram benchmarks, little attention has been paid to defining the benchmarks in their entirety. In this work, we propose a four-tuple that formally defines multi-program benchmarks in a well-defined way. We then examine how four different classes of benchmarks created by varying the elements of this tuple align with real-world use-cases. We evaluate the impact of these variations on real hardware, and see drastic variations in results between different benchmarks constructed from the same programs. Notable differences include significant speedups versus slowdowns (e.g., +57% vs -5% or +26% vs -18%), and large differences in magnitude even when the results are in the same direction (e.g., 67% versus 11%).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Graph Processing Platforms at Scale: Practices and Experiences Self-monitoring overhead of the Linux perf_ event performance counter interface Analyzing communication models for distributed thread-collaborative processors in terms of energy and time A full-system approach to analyze the impact of next-generation mobile flash storage Graph-matching-based simulation-region selection for multiple binaries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1