镗削参数力的预测与验证

Z. Wang, Kai Zhang, W. Wang, Haifeng Zhao
{"title":"镗削参数力的预测与验证","authors":"Z. Wang, Kai Zhang, W. Wang, Haifeng Zhao","doi":"10.1109/ISCID.2013.101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is notoriously known there are lots of factors influence cutter efficiency and tool life for boring operations. The key problem is how much each influenced and where is the best balance point. This paper uses the orthogonal test method to simulate and verified the influence by the most two important cutting parameters, like cutting speed, cutting penetration (which is the same as cutting depth as in the mechanical machine). Firstly, we used the optimized model and designed a new test mechanism. In the simulation part, we use Rock Failure Process Analysis in simulates the rock fragments and the changes of stress field. With these new numerical algorithms, we can simulate the mass and cutting forces in the boring, and we finally find each balance point in the real boring in different cutting parameters. And we also updated a new liner cutting test experimental mechanism, which can simulate the real boring operations in the lab when we set different cutting parameters. We use the simulation and test method to verify our predicting result. We show that the best penetration is 3.8mm and the best cutting speed is 2.1mm/s for 17 inches cutter ring in our cutting test. However, since we understand the complex of different factors we can bound the balance point to those values in certain boring condition.","PeriodicalId":297027,"journal":{"name":"2013 Sixth International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting and Verifying Forces on Boring Parameters\",\"authors\":\"Z. Wang, Kai Zhang, W. Wang, Haifeng Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISCID.2013.101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is notoriously known there are lots of factors influence cutter efficiency and tool life for boring operations. The key problem is how much each influenced and where is the best balance point. This paper uses the orthogonal test method to simulate and verified the influence by the most two important cutting parameters, like cutting speed, cutting penetration (which is the same as cutting depth as in the mechanical machine). Firstly, we used the optimized model and designed a new test mechanism. In the simulation part, we use Rock Failure Process Analysis in simulates the rock fragments and the changes of stress field. With these new numerical algorithms, we can simulate the mass and cutting forces in the boring, and we finally find each balance point in the real boring in different cutting parameters. And we also updated a new liner cutting test experimental mechanism, which can simulate the real boring operations in the lab when we set different cutting parameters. We use the simulation and test method to verify our predicting result. We show that the best penetration is 3.8mm and the best cutting speed is 2.1mm/s for 17 inches cutter ring in our cutting test. However, since we understand the complex of different factors we can bound the balance point to those values in certain boring condition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":297027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 Sixth International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 Sixth International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCID.2013.101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 Sixth International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCID.2013.101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

众所周知,镗孔作业中影响刀具效率和刀具寿命的因素很多。关键的问题是每一种影响有多大以及最佳平衡点在哪里。本文采用正交试验法模拟验证了切削速度、切削深度(与机械切削深度相同)这两个最重要的切削参数的影响。首先,利用优化后的模型,设计了新的测试机构。在模拟部分,我们采用岩石破坏过程分析方法,模拟岩石破碎过程和应力场的变化。利用这些新的数值算法,可以模拟镗削过程中的质量和切削力,最终找到实际镗削过程中不同切削参数下的各个平衡点。并更新了一种新的直线切削试验实验机构,在设置不同切削参数的情况下,可以模拟实验室中真实的镗削过程。用仿真和测试的方法验证了我们的预测结果。在我们的切削试验中,我们发现17英寸刀环的最佳穿透度为3.8mm,最佳切削速度为2.1mm/s。然而,由于我们了解不同因素的复杂性,我们可以在一定的无聊条件下将平衡点绑定到这些值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predicting and Verifying Forces on Boring Parameters
It is notoriously known there are lots of factors influence cutter efficiency and tool life for boring operations. The key problem is how much each influenced and where is the best balance point. This paper uses the orthogonal test method to simulate and verified the influence by the most two important cutting parameters, like cutting speed, cutting penetration (which is the same as cutting depth as in the mechanical machine). Firstly, we used the optimized model and designed a new test mechanism. In the simulation part, we use Rock Failure Process Analysis in simulates the rock fragments and the changes of stress field. With these new numerical algorithms, we can simulate the mass and cutting forces in the boring, and we finally find each balance point in the real boring in different cutting parameters. And we also updated a new liner cutting test experimental mechanism, which can simulate the real boring operations in the lab when we set different cutting parameters. We use the simulation and test method to verify our predicting result. We show that the best penetration is 3.8mm and the best cutting speed is 2.1mm/s for 17 inches cutter ring in our cutting test. However, since we understand the complex of different factors we can bound the balance point to those values in certain boring condition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Particle Swarm Optimization-Least Squares Support Vector Regression with Multi-scale Wavelet Kernel Application of BP Neural Networks to Testing the Reasonableness of Flood Season Staging Balancing an Inverted Pendulum with an EEG-Based BCI Multi-feature Visual Tracking Using Adaptive Unscented Kalman Filtering Design of a Novel Portable ECG Monitor for Heart Health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1