供应链和信息系统服务:土耳其和保加利亚中小企业的效率比较

S. Koh, E. Bayraktar, Ekrem Tatoğlu, M. Demirbag, S. Zaim
{"title":"供应链和信息系统服务:土耳其和保加利亚中小企业的效率比较","authors":"S. Koh, E. Bayraktar, Ekrem Tatoğlu, M. Demirbag, S. Zaim","doi":"10.1109/SOLI.2007.4383918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using data envelopment analysis (DEA) this study attempts to compare the relative efficiencies of supply chain management (SCM) and information system (IS) services of the SMEs operating in Turkey and Bulgaria. Some significant differences have been found between the efficiency levels of SCM services, IS services and SCM&IS services, and the nationality of the sample firms. Turkish SMEs tend to achieve higher efficiency level with respect to each group of input variables. There are also significant differences in returns to scale for each group of input variables with respect to the country of origin of the firms. In general, it would not be unreasonable to argue that Bulgarian SMEs have better potential to improve their operational performance by exerting relatively less effort through incrementing their level of SCM and IS services. The analysis of the improvement potential of inputs indicates that Bulgarian SMEs place more emphasis on managing most of the SCM services to enhance their SCM efficiency. However, no statistically significant differences in general were noted between both groups of firms with regard to the level of resources and efforts exerted on IS and SCM&IS services. In terms of the overall average of output deficits, Turkish SMEs were found to have significantly higher output deficits than Bulgarian SMEs with respect to all three groups of input variables. In other words, the capability of Turkish SMEs to transform input variables into operational performance is far lower than that of Bulgarian SMEs.","PeriodicalId":154053,"journal":{"name":"2007 IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supply Chain and Information System Services: An Efficiency Comparison between Turkish and Bulgarian SMEs\",\"authors\":\"S. Koh, E. Bayraktar, Ekrem Tatoğlu, M. Demirbag, S. Zaim\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SOLI.2007.4383918\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using data envelopment analysis (DEA) this study attempts to compare the relative efficiencies of supply chain management (SCM) and information system (IS) services of the SMEs operating in Turkey and Bulgaria. Some significant differences have been found between the efficiency levels of SCM services, IS services and SCM&IS services, and the nationality of the sample firms. Turkish SMEs tend to achieve higher efficiency level with respect to each group of input variables. There are also significant differences in returns to scale for each group of input variables with respect to the country of origin of the firms. In general, it would not be unreasonable to argue that Bulgarian SMEs have better potential to improve their operational performance by exerting relatively less effort through incrementing their level of SCM and IS services. The analysis of the improvement potential of inputs indicates that Bulgarian SMEs place more emphasis on managing most of the SCM services to enhance their SCM efficiency. However, no statistically significant differences in general were noted between both groups of firms with regard to the level of resources and efforts exerted on IS and SCM&IS services. In terms of the overall average of output deficits, Turkish SMEs were found to have significantly higher output deficits than Bulgarian SMEs with respect to all three groups of input variables. In other words, the capability of Turkish SMEs to transform input variables into operational performance is far lower than that of Bulgarian SMEs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":154053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2007 IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2007 IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SOLI.2007.4383918\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SOLI.2007.4383918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

利用数据包络分析(DEA),本研究试图比较在土耳其和保加利亚经营的中小企业的供应链管理(SCM)和信息系统(IS)服务的相对效率。研究发现,供应链管理服务、信息系统服务和供应链与信息系统服务的效率水平与样本企业的国籍之间存在显著差异。相对于每组投入变量,土耳其中小企业往往达到更高的效率水平。相对于企业的原产国,每组投入变量的规模回报也存在显著差异。一般来说,保加利亚中小企业通过增加供应链管理和信息系统服务水平而付出相对较少的努力,从而有更好的潜力来改善其运营绩效,这并非不合理。对投入改进潜力的分析表明,保加利亚中小企业更重视管理大多数供应链管理服务,以提高供应链管理效率。然而,两组公司在信息系统和SCM&IS服务的资源和努力水平方面总体上没有统计学上的显著差异。就产出赤字的总体平均而言,发现土耳其中小企业在所有三组投入变量方面的产出赤字明显高于保加利亚中小企业。也就是说,土耳其中小企业将投入变量转化为经营绩效的能力远远低于保加利亚中小企业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Supply Chain and Information System Services: An Efficiency Comparison between Turkish and Bulgarian SMEs
Using data envelopment analysis (DEA) this study attempts to compare the relative efficiencies of supply chain management (SCM) and information system (IS) services of the SMEs operating in Turkey and Bulgaria. Some significant differences have been found between the efficiency levels of SCM services, IS services and SCM&IS services, and the nationality of the sample firms. Turkish SMEs tend to achieve higher efficiency level with respect to each group of input variables. There are also significant differences in returns to scale for each group of input variables with respect to the country of origin of the firms. In general, it would not be unreasonable to argue that Bulgarian SMEs have better potential to improve their operational performance by exerting relatively less effort through incrementing their level of SCM and IS services. The analysis of the improvement potential of inputs indicates that Bulgarian SMEs place more emphasis on managing most of the SCM services to enhance their SCM efficiency. However, no statistically significant differences in general were noted between both groups of firms with regard to the level of resources and efforts exerted on IS and SCM&IS services. In terms of the overall average of output deficits, Turkish SMEs were found to have significantly higher output deficits than Bulgarian SMEs with respect to all three groups of input variables. In other words, the capability of Turkish SMEs to transform input variables into operational performance is far lower than that of Bulgarian SMEs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Supply Chains with Stochastic Models Outsourcing Decision-making Strategy for Collecting Used-products in Reverse Logistics The Strategic Research of Air Cargo Based on Rule Knowledge and Decision Tree Empirical Analysis on Supply Chain of Offshore Software Outsourcing from China Perspective Intelligence CRM: A Contact Center Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1