米尔伯格起诉的虚伪:需要一个连贯的框架来支付诉讼中的合作

Bruce H. Kobayashi, Larry E. Ribstein
{"title":"米尔伯格起诉的虚伪:需要一个连贯的框架来支付诉讼中的合作","authors":"Bruce H. Kobayashi, Larry E. Ribstein","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.955952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The indictment of the Milberg, Weiss firm and two of its named partners for allegedly illegal payments to lead plaintiffs stands at the intersection of important recent developments in both the expanding criminalization of corporate conduct and the federalization of corporate law. Many have noted the irony and hypocrisy of the Milberg firm's alleged use of illegal tactics to prosecute corporate illegality. However, the more important hypocrisy is that Milberg's prosecutors are essentially paying the same witness - Vogel - that Milberg is being prosecuted for paying. This case illustrates the need to need to develop coherent standards regarding payments to litigants and witnesses. These standards should take account of the incentive effects of the payments, rather than being based on a desire to discourage or encourage particular types of actions.","PeriodicalId":319600,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business and Technology Law","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Hypocrisy of the Milberg Indictment: The Need for a Coherent Framework on Paying for Cooperation in Litigation\",\"authors\":\"Bruce H. Kobayashi, Larry E. Ribstein\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.955952\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The indictment of the Milberg, Weiss firm and two of its named partners for allegedly illegal payments to lead plaintiffs stands at the intersection of important recent developments in both the expanding criminalization of corporate conduct and the federalization of corporate law. Many have noted the irony and hypocrisy of the Milberg firm's alleged use of illegal tactics to prosecute corporate illegality. However, the more important hypocrisy is that Milberg's prosecutors are essentially paying the same witness - Vogel - that Milberg is being prosecuted for paying. This case illustrates the need to need to develop coherent standards regarding payments to litigants and witnesses. These standards should take account of the incentive effects of the payments, rather than being based on a desire to discourage or encourage particular types of actions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":319600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business and Technology Law\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business and Technology Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.955952\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business and Technology Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.955952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

米尔伯格魏斯律师事务所及其两名具名合伙人涉嫌向主要原告支付非法款项,这一指控反映了企业行为刑事化和公司法联邦化的重要最新发展。许多人注意到米尔伯格律师事务所涉嫌使用非法手段起诉公司违法行为的讽刺和虚伪。然而,更重要的虚伪是,米尔伯格的检察官实际上是在付钱给同样的证人——沃格尔——米尔伯格因为付钱而被起诉。这一案件表明,有必要就支付给诉讼当事人和证人的款项制定一致的标准。这些标准应考虑到付款的激励作用,而不是基于阻止或鼓励特定类型行动的愿望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Hypocrisy of the Milberg Indictment: The Need for a Coherent Framework on Paying for Cooperation in Litigation
The indictment of the Milberg, Weiss firm and two of its named partners for allegedly illegal payments to lead plaintiffs stands at the intersection of important recent developments in both the expanding criminalization of corporate conduct and the federalization of corporate law. Many have noted the irony and hypocrisy of the Milberg firm's alleged use of illegal tactics to prosecute corporate illegality. However, the more important hypocrisy is that Milberg's prosecutors are essentially paying the same witness - Vogel - that Milberg is being prosecuted for paying. This case illustrates the need to need to develop coherent standards regarding payments to litigants and witnesses. These standards should take account of the incentive effects of the payments, rather than being based on a desire to discourage or encourage particular types of actions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Nearby Doctor Search Application Based on Android Designing Learning Game for Human Digestive System Based on Motion Sensors The Information Systems of Boarding House Search Application In Soegijapranata Catholic University Semarang Based On Android World Covid-19 Vaccine Names Classification Using Neural Network Method Game Design as A Character Education Media For Children
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1