湍流中纳米和微粒沉积和分散的改进DRW模型

Amir A. Mofakham, G. Ahmadi
{"title":"湍流中纳米和微粒沉积和分散的改进DRW模型","authors":"Amir A. Mofakham, G. Ahmadi","doi":"10.1115/fedsm2020-20034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this study, the accuracy of the discrete random walk (DRW) stochastic model in generating the instantaneous velocity fluctuations as seen by micro- and nano-particles in inhomogeneous turbulent flows were examined. Particular attention was given to the effects of the non-uniform normal RMS velocity fluctuations and turbulence time scale on the DRW model predictions. The trajectories of randomly injected point-particles with diameters ranging from 10 nm to 30 μm in a duct were evaluated using an in-house Matlab particle tracking code. The particle equation of motion included the drag and Brownian forces. The fully developed mean velocity and RMS fluctuation velocity profiles were exported from the RANS (v2f) simulations and were used for the particle dispersion and transport analysis. It was assumed that the particle-laden flow is sufficiently dilute so that the particle-particle collisions and the two-way coupling effects of particles on the flow could be ignored.\n To incorporate the instantaneous turbulence velocity fluctuations effects on particle dispersion, the Conventional-DRW model (in the absence of drift corrections), which was originally developed for homogenous turbulent flows, was first used. It was shown that the Conventional-DRW model leads to superfluous migration of fluid-point particles toward the wall and erroneous particle deposition rate. The Modified-DRW model with an appropriate velocity gradient drift correction term was also tested. It was found that the predicted concentration profiles of tracer particles still are not uniform. It was hypothesized that the reason for this erroneous prediction is due to the inhomogeneous turbulence time macroscale in the channel flow. A new drift correction term as a function of gradients of both RMS fluctuation velocity and the turbulence time macroscale was proposed. It was shown that the new Improved-DRW model with the velocity and time scale drift corrections leads to uniform distributions for fluid-point particles and reasonable concentration profiles for finite-size particles. It was shown that the predicted deposition velocities of different size particles by the proposed Improved-DRW model are in good agreement with the available experimental data as well as the predictions of the empirical models and earlier DNS results.","PeriodicalId":333138,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2: Fluid Mechanics; Multiphase Flows","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved DRW Model for Prediction of Deposition and Dispersion of Nano- and Micro-Particles in Turbulent Flows\",\"authors\":\"Amir A. Mofakham, G. Ahmadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/fedsm2020-20034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In this study, the accuracy of the discrete random walk (DRW) stochastic model in generating the instantaneous velocity fluctuations as seen by micro- and nano-particles in inhomogeneous turbulent flows were examined. Particular attention was given to the effects of the non-uniform normal RMS velocity fluctuations and turbulence time scale on the DRW model predictions. The trajectories of randomly injected point-particles with diameters ranging from 10 nm to 30 μm in a duct were evaluated using an in-house Matlab particle tracking code. The particle equation of motion included the drag and Brownian forces. The fully developed mean velocity and RMS fluctuation velocity profiles were exported from the RANS (v2f) simulations and were used for the particle dispersion and transport analysis. It was assumed that the particle-laden flow is sufficiently dilute so that the particle-particle collisions and the two-way coupling effects of particles on the flow could be ignored.\\n To incorporate the instantaneous turbulence velocity fluctuations effects on particle dispersion, the Conventional-DRW model (in the absence of drift corrections), which was originally developed for homogenous turbulent flows, was first used. It was shown that the Conventional-DRW model leads to superfluous migration of fluid-point particles toward the wall and erroneous particle deposition rate. The Modified-DRW model with an appropriate velocity gradient drift correction term was also tested. It was found that the predicted concentration profiles of tracer particles still are not uniform. It was hypothesized that the reason for this erroneous prediction is due to the inhomogeneous turbulence time macroscale in the channel flow. A new drift correction term as a function of gradients of both RMS fluctuation velocity and the turbulence time macroscale was proposed. It was shown that the new Improved-DRW model with the velocity and time scale drift corrections leads to uniform distributions for fluid-point particles and reasonable concentration profiles for finite-size particles. It was shown that the predicted deposition velocities of different size particles by the proposed Improved-DRW model are in good agreement with the available experimental data as well as the predictions of the empirical models and earlier DNS results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":333138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 2: Fluid Mechanics; Multiphase Flows\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 2: Fluid Mechanics; Multiphase Flows\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/fedsm2020-20034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2: Fluid Mechanics; Multiphase Flows","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/fedsm2020-20034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在本研究中,我们检验了离散随机漫步(DRW)随机模型在产生非均匀湍流中微粒子和纳米粒子的瞬时速度波动时的准确性。特别注意了非均匀正态均方根速度波动和湍流时间尺度对DRW模式预测的影响。利用Matlab内部的粒子跟踪代码对随机注入直径为10 nm ~ 30 μm的点粒子在管道中的运动轨迹进行了计算。粒子运动方程包括阻力和布朗力。从RANS (v2f)模拟中导出了完全开发的平均速度和RMS波动速度曲线,并用于颗粒分散和输运分析。假设载重颗粒的流动足够稀释,可以忽略颗粒-颗粒碰撞和颗粒对流动的双向耦合效应。为了考虑瞬时湍流速度波动对粒子弥散的影响,首先使用了最初为均匀湍流开发的Conventional-DRW模型(在没有漂移修正的情况下)。结果表明,常规- drw模型会导致流体点颗粒向壁面的过量迁移和错误的颗粒沉积速率。采用适当的速度梯度漂移修正项对修正后的drw模型进行了验证。结果表明,预测的示踪粒子浓度分布仍不均匀。据推测,造成这种预测错误的原因是由于通道流湍流时间宏观尺度的不均匀性。提出了一种新的漂移校正项,它是均方根波动速度梯度和湍流时间梯度的函数。结果表明,采用速度和时间尺度漂移修正后的改进drw模型可使液点颗粒分布均匀,使有限粒径颗粒的浓度分布合理。结果表明,改进的drw模型预测的不同粒径颗粒的沉积速度与已有的实验数据、经验模型的预测结果和早期的DNS结果吻合较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improved DRW Model for Prediction of Deposition and Dispersion of Nano- and Micro-Particles in Turbulent Flows
In this study, the accuracy of the discrete random walk (DRW) stochastic model in generating the instantaneous velocity fluctuations as seen by micro- and nano-particles in inhomogeneous turbulent flows were examined. Particular attention was given to the effects of the non-uniform normal RMS velocity fluctuations and turbulence time scale on the DRW model predictions. The trajectories of randomly injected point-particles with diameters ranging from 10 nm to 30 μm in a duct were evaluated using an in-house Matlab particle tracking code. The particle equation of motion included the drag and Brownian forces. The fully developed mean velocity and RMS fluctuation velocity profiles were exported from the RANS (v2f) simulations and were used for the particle dispersion and transport analysis. It was assumed that the particle-laden flow is sufficiently dilute so that the particle-particle collisions and the two-way coupling effects of particles on the flow could be ignored. To incorporate the instantaneous turbulence velocity fluctuations effects on particle dispersion, the Conventional-DRW model (in the absence of drift corrections), which was originally developed for homogenous turbulent flows, was first used. It was shown that the Conventional-DRW model leads to superfluous migration of fluid-point particles toward the wall and erroneous particle deposition rate. The Modified-DRW model with an appropriate velocity gradient drift correction term was also tested. It was found that the predicted concentration profiles of tracer particles still are not uniform. It was hypothesized that the reason for this erroneous prediction is due to the inhomogeneous turbulence time macroscale in the channel flow. A new drift correction term as a function of gradients of both RMS fluctuation velocity and the turbulence time macroscale was proposed. It was shown that the new Improved-DRW model with the velocity and time scale drift corrections leads to uniform distributions for fluid-point particles and reasonable concentration profiles for finite-size particles. It was shown that the predicted deposition velocities of different size particles by the proposed Improved-DRW model are in good agreement with the available experimental data as well as the predictions of the empirical models and earlier DNS results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lattice Boltzmann Method Based on Large-Eddy Simulation (LES) Used to Investigate the Unsteady Turbulent Flow on Series of Cavities Unified Assessment Approach for Courses With Simulation Component [And Professors in Hurry] Stereo-PIV Measurements of Turbulent Swirling Flow Inside a Pipe WearGP: A UQ/ML Wear Prediction Framework for Slurry Pump Impellers and Casings Optimal Control Strategy to Distribute Water Through Loop-Like Planar Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1