俄罗斯的数量武器。俄罗斯强势(非)信息行动的演变:2008年俄格战争与2014年克里米亚并吞案例的比较分析

Revaz Topuria
{"title":"俄罗斯的数量武器。俄罗斯强势(非)信息行动的演变:2008年俄格战争与2014年克里米亚并吞案例的比较分析","authors":"Revaz Topuria","doi":"10.33674/120203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Russian assertive actions over the last decade have led some observers to\nthink that the Kremlin is employing fundamentally new concepts of an\narmed conflict. Subsequently, the scholars of the field came up with\nseveral buzzwords and ill-defined concepts such as ‘hybrid warfare’ and\n‘Gerasimov Doctrine’. This paper claims that the novelty of Russian\nactions is not in terms of its military transformations per se, but rather\nthe specific way the military had been integrated with other\ninstruments—mostly state-run and coordinated information operations.\nThus, the study puts a novel emphasis on information operations and\nasserts that, while in certain cases Moscow still uses the conventional\nmilitary, the Kremlin's new plan is to achieve goals through information\nonline in the first place. Thus, the paper focuses on analysing the\nevolution of Russian information strategy. In doing so, quantitative\ncontent analysis is deployed to examine narratives built by RIA Novosti\nand Russia Today/RT during the Russo-Georgian War of 2008 and\nannexation of Crimea in 2014. The comparative analysis of the two\nsuccessive cases demonstrates the gradual progression of Russian\ninformation strategy insofar as by 2014, in contrast to 2008, pro-Kremlin\nmedia exploited some contested areas of international law in a more sophisticated manner to depict compatibility of the Russian actions with\nthe democratic procedures and standards of international law.","PeriodicalId":256788,"journal":{"name":"Ante Portas - Studia nad bezpieczeństwem","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Russia’s Weapon of Words in Numbers. Evolution of Russian Assertive\\n(Dis)Information Actions: Comparative Analysis of the Cases of RussoGeorgian War 2008 & Annexation of Crimea 2014 .\",\"authors\":\"Revaz Topuria\",\"doi\":\"10.33674/120203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Russian assertive actions over the last decade have led some observers to\\nthink that the Kremlin is employing fundamentally new concepts of an\\narmed conflict. Subsequently, the scholars of the field came up with\\nseveral buzzwords and ill-defined concepts such as ‘hybrid warfare’ and\\n‘Gerasimov Doctrine’. This paper claims that the novelty of Russian\\nactions is not in terms of its military transformations per se, but rather\\nthe specific way the military had been integrated with other\\ninstruments—mostly state-run and coordinated information operations.\\nThus, the study puts a novel emphasis on information operations and\\nasserts that, while in certain cases Moscow still uses the conventional\\nmilitary, the Kremlin's new plan is to achieve goals through information\\nonline in the first place. Thus, the paper focuses on analysing the\\nevolution of Russian information strategy. In doing so, quantitative\\ncontent analysis is deployed to examine narratives built by RIA Novosti\\nand Russia Today/RT during the Russo-Georgian War of 2008 and\\nannexation of Crimea in 2014. The comparative analysis of the two\\nsuccessive cases demonstrates the gradual progression of Russian\\ninformation strategy insofar as by 2014, in contrast to 2008, pro-Kremlin\\nmedia exploited some contested areas of international law in a more sophisticated manner to depict compatibility of the Russian actions with\\nthe democratic procedures and standards of international law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":256788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ante Portas - Studia nad bezpieczeństwem\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ante Portas - Studia nad bezpieczeństwem\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33674/120203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ante Portas - Studia nad bezpieczeństwem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33674/120203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

俄罗斯在过去10年的强硬行动让一些观察人士认为,克里姆林宫正在采用一种全新的武装冲突概念。随后,该领域的学者提出了几个流行语和模糊的概念,如“混合战争”和“格拉西莫夫主义”。本文声称,俄罗斯行动的新颖性不在于其军事转型本身,而在于军队与其他手段(主要是国有和协调的信息行动)相结合的具体方式。因此,该研究新颖地强调了信息作战,并断言,虽然在某些情况下莫斯科仍然使用常规军事力量,但克里姆林宫的新计划是首先通过在线信息实现目标。因此,本文着重分析了俄罗斯信息战略的演变。在此过程中,定量内容分析被用于检验俄新社和今日俄罗斯/今日俄罗斯在2008年俄格战争和2014年克里米亚被吞并期间所构建的叙事。对这两个连续案例的比较分析表明,到2014年,与2008年相比,亲克里姆林宫的媒体以更复杂的方式利用了一些有争议的国际法领域,以描绘俄罗斯行动与民主程序和国际法标准的兼容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Russia’s Weapon of Words in Numbers. Evolution of Russian Assertive (Dis)Information Actions: Comparative Analysis of the Cases of RussoGeorgian War 2008 & Annexation of Crimea 2014 .
Russian assertive actions over the last decade have led some observers to think that the Kremlin is employing fundamentally new concepts of an armed conflict. Subsequently, the scholars of the field came up with several buzzwords and ill-defined concepts such as ‘hybrid warfare’ and ‘Gerasimov Doctrine’. This paper claims that the novelty of Russian actions is not in terms of its military transformations per se, but rather the specific way the military had been integrated with other instruments—mostly state-run and coordinated information operations. Thus, the study puts a novel emphasis on information operations and asserts that, while in certain cases Moscow still uses the conventional military, the Kremlin's new plan is to achieve goals through information online in the first place. Thus, the paper focuses on analysing the evolution of Russian information strategy. In doing so, quantitative content analysis is deployed to examine narratives built by RIA Novosti and Russia Today/RT during the Russo-Georgian War of 2008 and annexation of Crimea in 2014. The comparative analysis of the two successive cases demonstrates the gradual progression of Russian information strategy insofar as by 2014, in contrast to 2008, pro-Kremlin media exploited some contested areas of international law in a more sophisticated manner to depict compatibility of the Russian actions with the democratic procedures and standards of international law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
NATO Regional Approaches to Missile Defense – in the Context of Black Sea Security Russia’s Weapon of Words in Numbers. Evolution of Russian Assertive (Dis)Information Actions: Comparative Analysis of the Cases of RussoGeorgian War 2008 & Annexation of Crimea 2014 . An Assessment of Special Military Operations in Internal Security Management in Nigeria (1966-2019) Influence of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty Termination on the Regional Security of Central Asia Bezpieczeństwo ekonomiczne, zmiany klimatyczne, wyzwania
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1