{"title":"俄罗斯的数量武器。俄罗斯强势(非)信息行动的演变:2008年俄格战争与2014年克里米亚并吞案例的比较分析","authors":"Revaz Topuria","doi":"10.33674/120203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Russian assertive actions over the last decade have led some observers to\nthink that the Kremlin is employing fundamentally new concepts of an\narmed conflict. Subsequently, the scholars of the field came up with\nseveral buzzwords and ill-defined concepts such as ‘hybrid warfare’ and\n‘Gerasimov Doctrine’. This paper claims that the novelty of Russian\nactions is not in terms of its military transformations per se, but rather\nthe specific way the military had been integrated with other\ninstruments—mostly state-run and coordinated information operations.\nThus, the study puts a novel emphasis on information operations and\nasserts that, while in certain cases Moscow still uses the conventional\nmilitary, the Kremlin's new plan is to achieve goals through information\nonline in the first place. Thus, the paper focuses on analysing the\nevolution of Russian information strategy. In doing so, quantitative\ncontent analysis is deployed to examine narratives built by RIA Novosti\nand Russia Today/RT during the Russo-Georgian War of 2008 and\nannexation of Crimea in 2014. The comparative analysis of the two\nsuccessive cases demonstrates the gradual progression of Russian\ninformation strategy insofar as by 2014, in contrast to 2008, pro-Kremlin\nmedia exploited some contested areas of international law in a more sophisticated manner to depict compatibility of the Russian actions with\nthe democratic procedures and standards of international law.","PeriodicalId":256788,"journal":{"name":"Ante Portas - Studia nad bezpieczeństwem","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Russia’s Weapon of Words in Numbers. Evolution of Russian Assertive\\n(Dis)Information Actions: Comparative Analysis of the Cases of RussoGeorgian War 2008 & Annexation of Crimea 2014 .\",\"authors\":\"Revaz Topuria\",\"doi\":\"10.33674/120203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Russian assertive actions over the last decade have led some observers to\\nthink that the Kremlin is employing fundamentally new concepts of an\\narmed conflict. Subsequently, the scholars of the field came up with\\nseveral buzzwords and ill-defined concepts such as ‘hybrid warfare’ and\\n‘Gerasimov Doctrine’. This paper claims that the novelty of Russian\\nactions is not in terms of its military transformations per se, but rather\\nthe specific way the military had been integrated with other\\ninstruments—mostly state-run and coordinated information operations.\\nThus, the study puts a novel emphasis on information operations and\\nasserts that, while in certain cases Moscow still uses the conventional\\nmilitary, the Kremlin's new plan is to achieve goals through information\\nonline in the first place. Thus, the paper focuses on analysing the\\nevolution of Russian information strategy. In doing so, quantitative\\ncontent analysis is deployed to examine narratives built by RIA Novosti\\nand Russia Today/RT during the Russo-Georgian War of 2008 and\\nannexation of Crimea in 2014. The comparative analysis of the two\\nsuccessive cases demonstrates the gradual progression of Russian\\ninformation strategy insofar as by 2014, in contrast to 2008, pro-Kremlin\\nmedia exploited some contested areas of international law in a more sophisticated manner to depict compatibility of the Russian actions with\\nthe democratic procedures and standards of international law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":256788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ante Portas - Studia nad bezpieczeństwem\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ante Portas - Studia nad bezpieczeństwem\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33674/120203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ante Portas - Studia nad bezpieczeństwem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33674/120203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Russia’s Weapon of Words in Numbers. Evolution of Russian Assertive
(Dis)Information Actions: Comparative Analysis of the Cases of RussoGeorgian War 2008 & Annexation of Crimea 2014 .
Russian assertive actions over the last decade have led some observers to
think that the Kremlin is employing fundamentally new concepts of an
armed conflict. Subsequently, the scholars of the field came up with
several buzzwords and ill-defined concepts such as ‘hybrid warfare’ and
‘Gerasimov Doctrine’. This paper claims that the novelty of Russian
actions is not in terms of its military transformations per se, but rather
the specific way the military had been integrated with other
instruments—mostly state-run and coordinated information operations.
Thus, the study puts a novel emphasis on information operations and
asserts that, while in certain cases Moscow still uses the conventional
military, the Kremlin's new plan is to achieve goals through information
online in the first place. Thus, the paper focuses on analysing the
evolution of Russian information strategy. In doing so, quantitative
content analysis is deployed to examine narratives built by RIA Novosti
and Russia Today/RT during the Russo-Georgian War of 2008 and
annexation of Crimea in 2014. The comparative analysis of the two
successive cases demonstrates the gradual progression of Russian
information strategy insofar as by 2014, in contrast to 2008, pro-Kremlin
media exploited some contested areas of international law in a more sophisticated manner to depict compatibility of the Russian actions with
the democratic procedures and standards of international law.