发展机制

T. J. Pempel
{"title":"发展机制","authors":"T. J. Pempel","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501758799.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter argues that certain economic achievements arose in tandem with a specific type of regime in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan, and a particular economic paradigm. The three national experiences, though not identical, were sufficiently analogous in a number of fundamentals that they can be treated as a group. They provide empirical manifestations of “developmental regimes.” All three had strong and cohesive state institutions; each had concentrated and dominant progrowth socioeconomic coalitions; all received extensive security and economic support from the United States and enjoyed the benefits of global financial and trade institutions. Each regime bonded around the so-called “protection pacts.” Driven by a shared sense of existential threat, foreign and domestic elites joined together to advance an economic policy paradigm that the chapter considers “embedded mercantilism.” Core components included industrial policy, undervalued currencies, export expansion, and rapid industrialization, all advancing behind institutional bulwarks against the perceived threats.","PeriodicalId":256441,"journal":{"name":"A Region of Regimes","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developmental Regimes\",\"authors\":\"T. J. Pempel\",\"doi\":\"10.7591/cornell/9781501758799.003.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter argues that certain economic achievements arose in tandem with a specific type of regime in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan, and a particular economic paradigm. The three national experiences, though not identical, were sufficiently analogous in a number of fundamentals that they can be treated as a group. They provide empirical manifestations of “developmental regimes.” All three had strong and cohesive state institutions; each had concentrated and dominant progrowth socioeconomic coalitions; all received extensive security and economic support from the United States and enjoyed the benefits of global financial and trade institutions. Each regime bonded around the so-called “protection pacts.” Driven by a shared sense of existential threat, foreign and domestic elites joined together to advance an economic policy paradigm that the chapter considers “embedded mercantilism.” Core components included industrial policy, undervalued currencies, export expansion, and rapid industrialization, all advancing behind institutional bulwarks against the perceived threats.\",\"PeriodicalId\":256441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"A Region of Regimes\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"A Region of Regimes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501758799.003.0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A Region of Regimes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501758799.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章认为,某些经济成就是与日本、韩国和台湾特定类型的政权以及特定的经济范式相结合而产生的。这三个国家的经验,虽然不完全相同,但在一些基本方面是足够相似的,它们可以被视为一个群体。它们提供了“发展体制”的经验表现。这三个国家都有强大而有凝聚力的国家机构;每个国家都有集中和主导的增长社会经济联盟;它们都得到了美国广泛的安全和经济支持,并享有全球金融和贸易机构的好处。每个政权都围绕着所谓的“保护协定”团结在一起。在一种共同的生存威胁意识的驱使下,国内外精英联合起来,推进了一种经济政策范式,该章将其称为“嵌入式重商主义”。核心组成部分包括产业政策、低估的货币、出口扩张和快速工业化,所有这些都在抵御感知到的威胁的制度壁垒后面推进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Developmental Regimes
This chapter argues that certain economic achievements arose in tandem with a specific type of regime in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan, and a particular economic paradigm. The three national experiences, though not identical, were sufficiently analogous in a number of fundamentals that they can be treated as a group. They provide empirical manifestations of “developmental regimes.” All three had strong and cohesive state institutions; each had concentrated and dominant progrowth socioeconomic coalitions; all received extensive security and economic support from the United States and enjoyed the benefits of global financial and trade institutions. Each regime bonded around the so-called “protection pacts.” Driven by a shared sense of existential threat, foreign and domestic elites joined together to advance an economic policy paradigm that the chapter considers “embedded mercantilism.” Core components included industrial policy, undervalued currencies, export expansion, and rapid industrialization, all advancing behind institutional bulwarks against the perceived threats.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
China 6. Regimes and the Regional Order Developmental Regimes Regimes and the Regional Order Rapacious Regimes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1