计算机和机器人在未来耳科手术中的作用

N. Matsumoto
{"title":"计算机和机器人在未来耳科手术中的作用","authors":"N. Matsumoto","doi":"10.7599/HMR.2016.36.4.230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of computers and robots in the medical field is no longer a research interest but already a part of clinical routine. In otolaryngology/ head and neck surgery, imageguided surgery (IGS) and robotic surgery are becoming more common. IGS provides the computerized real-time feedback to the surgeon about the location and orientation of the surgical devices along with the anatomical information of surrounding structures. The IGS foresees the hidden anatomical structures before they are exposed. IGS is now widely used in endoscopic sinus surgery where the effectiveness of surgical navigation has been reported [1]. The robotic surgery enhances the fine movement of the surgeon’s hands to achieve the surgical goal with minimal damage to surrounding structures. The Da Vinci series (Intuitive Surgical Inc, USA), the only surgical robots currently available, are employed in laryngeal and pharyngeal surgery through the patient’s mouth, which is now termed the transoral robotic surgery (TORS), with promising clinical outcomes [2]. On the other hand, IGS or robots in the otological field are much less popular and most of the otological procedures are exclusively performed manually, which have basically remained unchanged for decades. The otologists’ concern about IGS and robots has been the balance between the required accuracy and the additional invasiveness. Many otologists demand the registration error of no more than 0.5 mm in otological procedures. This requirement almost reaches the inherent limit of accuracy defined by the physical resolution of the CT dataset, i.e. the pixel size, which is typically 0.2-0.5 mm. To achieve this high degree of accuracy, invasive procedures have often been justified, such as invasive fiducial marking, head clamping, or additional radioexposure by intraoperative CT scanning. This invasiveness, however, has restricted the use of IGS to unusually difficult cases that we rarely encounter. Otological cases that justify the robotic surgery with its underlying invasiveness are even rarer. Thus, Corresponding Author: Nozomu Matsumoto, M.D., Ph.D 3-1-1 Maidashi Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan Tel: +81-92-642-5668 Fax: +81-92-642-5685 E-mail: matunozo@med.kyushu-u.ac.jp","PeriodicalId":345710,"journal":{"name":"Hanyang Medical Reviews","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of computers and robots in future otological surgery\",\"authors\":\"N. Matsumoto\",\"doi\":\"10.7599/HMR.2016.36.4.230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of computers and robots in the medical field is no longer a research interest but already a part of clinical routine. In otolaryngology/ head and neck surgery, imageguided surgery (IGS) and robotic surgery are becoming more common. IGS provides the computerized real-time feedback to the surgeon about the location and orientation of the surgical devices along with the anatomical information of surrounding structures. The IGS foresees the hidden anatomical structures before they are exposed. IGS is now widely used in endoscopic sinus surgery where the effectiveness of surgical navigation has been reported [1]. The robotic surgery enhances the fine movement of the surgeon’s hands to achieve the surgical goal with minimal damage to surrounding structures. The Da Vinci series (Intuitive Surgical Inc, USA), the only surgical robots currently available, are employed in laryngeal and pharyngeal surgery through the patient’s mouth, which is now termed the transoral robotic surgery (TORS), with promising clinical outcomes [2]. On the other hand, IGS or robots in the otological field are much less popular and most of the otological procedures are exclusively performed manually, which have basically remained unchanged for decades. The otologists’ concern about IGS and robots has been the balance between the required accuracy and the additional invasiveness. Many otologists demand the registration error of no more than 0.5 mm in otological procedures. This requirement almost reaches the inherent limit of accuracy defined by the physical resolution of the CT dataset, i.e. the pixel size, which is typically 0.2-0.5 mm. To achieve this high degree of accuracy, invasive procedures have often been justified, such as invasive fiducial marking, head clamping, or additional radioexposure by intraoperative CT scanning. This invasiveness, however, has restricted the use of IGS to unusually difficult cases that we rarely encounter. Otological cases that justify the robotic surgery with its underlying invasiveness are even rarer. Thus, Corresponding Author: Nozomu Matsumoto, M.D., Ph.D 3-1-1 Maidashi Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan Tel: +81-92-642-5668 Fax: +81-92-642-5685 E-mail: matunozo@med.kyushu-u.ac.jp\",\"PeriodicalId\":345710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hanyang Medical Reviews\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hanyang Medical Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7599/HMR.2016.36.4.230\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hanyang Medical Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7599/HMR.2016.36.4.230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在医学领域使用计算机和机器人不再是一个研究兴趣,而已经是临床常规的一部分。在耳鼻喉科/头颈部手术中,图像引导手术(IGS)和机器人手术正变得越来越普遍。IGS为外科医生提供有关手术装置的位置和方向以及周围结构的解剖信息的计算机实时反馈。IGS在隐藏的解剖结构暴露之前就能预测到它们。IGS现已广泛应用于内镜鼻窦手术,手术导航的有效性已被报道[1]。机器人手术增强了外科医生手部的精细运动,以实现手术目标,同时对周围结构的损伤最小。达芬奇系列(Intuitive Surgical Inc, USA)是目前唯一可用的手术机器人,通过患者的口腔进行喉部和咽部手术,现在被称为经口机器人手术(transcoral robotic surgery, TORS),临床效果良好[2]。另一方面,耳科领域的IGS或机器人的普及程度要低得多,大多数耳科手术都是人工完成的,几十年来基本保持不变。耳科医生对IGS和机器人的担忧一直是在所需的准确性和额外的侵入性之间取得平衡。许多耳科医生在耳科手术中要求注册误差不超过0.5 mm。这一要求几乎达到了CT数据集物理分辨率所定义的固有精度极限,即像素大小,通常为0.2-0.5 mm。为了达到这种高度的准确性,侵入性手术通常是合理的,例如侵入性基准标记、头部夹持或术中CT扫描的额外放射照射。然而,这种侵入性将IGS的使用限制在我们很少遇到的异常困难的情况下。以其潜在的侵入性来证明机器人手术合理性的耳科病例就更少了。因此,通讯作者:Nozomu Matsumoto, M.D, Ph.D . 3-1-1 maidashhigashi -ku,福冈812-8582,日本电话:+81-92-642-5668传真:+81-92-642-5685 E-mail: matunozo@med.kyushu-u.ac.jp
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Role of computers and robots in future otological surgery
The use of computers and robots in the medical field is no longer a research interest but already a part of clinical routine. In otolaryngology/ head and neck surgery, imageguided surgery (IGS) and robotic surgery are becoming more common. IGS provides the computerized real-time feedback to the surgeon about the location and orientation of the surgical devices along with the anatomical information of surrounding structures. The IGS foresees the hidden anatomical structures before they are exposed. IGS is now widely used in endoscopic sinus surgery where the effectiveness of surgical navigation has been reported [1]. The robotic surgery enhances the fine movement of the surgeon’s hands to achieve the surgical goal with minimal damage to surrounding structures. The Da Vinci series (Intuitive Surgical Inc, USA), the only surgical robots currently available, are employed in laryngeal and pharyngeal surgery through the patient’s mouth, which is now termed the transoral robotic surgery (TORS), with promising clinical outcomes [2]. On the other hand, IGS or robots in the otological field are much less popular and most of the otological procedures are exclusively performed manually, which have basically remained unchanged for decades. The otologists’ concern about IGS and robots has been the balance between the required accuracy and the additional invasiveness. Many otologists demand the registration error of no more than 0.5 mm in otological procedures. This requirement almost reaches the inherent limit of accuracy defined by the physical resolution of the CT dataset, i.e. the pixel size, which is typically 0.2-0.5 mm. To achieve this high degree of accuracy, invasive procedures have often been justified, such as invasive fiducial marking, head clamping, or additional radioexposure by intraoperative CT scanning. This invasiveness, however, has restricted the use of IGS to unusually difficult cases that we rarely encounter. Otological cases that justify the robotic surgery with its underlying invasiveness are even rarer. Thus, Corresponding Author: Nozomu Matsumoto, M.D., Ph.D 3-1-1 Maidashi Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan Tel: +81-92-642-5668 Fax: +81-92-642-5685 E-mail: matunozo@med.kyushu-u.ac.jp
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Human Resistome Study with Metagenomic Sequencing Data Human Microbiome and Resistome Studies Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in Korea Microbiological Characteristics of Corynebacterium striatum, an Emerging Pathogen Microbiome of Hepatobiliary Diseases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1