{"title":"开边界问题混合方法的比较","authors":"G. Aiello, S. Alfonzetti, S. Rizzo, N. Salerno","doi":"10.1109/CEFC.2010.5481471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares the hybrid FEM-BEM and FEM-DBCI methods for the solution of open-boundary electrostatic field problems. Both methods couple a differential equation for the interior problem with an integral equation for the exterior one. The comparison shows that FEM-BEM is more accurate than FEM-DBCI but requires more computing time.","PeriodicalId":148739,"journal":{"name":"Digests of the 2010 14th Biennial IEEE Conference on Electromagnetic Field Computation","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison between hybrid methods for open-boundary problems\",\"authors\":\"G. Aiello, S. Alfonzetti, S. Rizzo, N. Salerno\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CEFC.2010.5481471\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper compares the hybrid FEM-BEM and FEM-DBCI methods for the solution of open-boundary electrostatic field problems. Both methods couple a differential equation for the interior problem with an integral equation for the exterior one. The comparison shows that FEM-BEM is more accurate than FEM-DBCI but requires more computing time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":148739,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digests of the 2010 14th Biennial IEEE Conference on Electromagnetic Field Computation\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digests of the 2010 14th Biennial IEEE Conference on Electromagnetic Field Computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEFC.2010.5481471\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digests of the 2010 14th Biennial IEEE Conference on Electromagnetic Field Computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEFC.2010.5481471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A comparison between hybrid methods for open-boundary problems
This paper compares the hybrid FEM-BEM and FEM-DBCI methods for the solution of open-boundary electrostatic field problems. Both methods couple a differential equation for the interior problem with an integral equation for the exterior one. The comparison shows that FEM-BEM is more accurate than FEM-DBCI but requires more computing time.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
